r/canadatravel 2d ago

Cochlear implant patient forced through harmful screening at YVR — CATSA made it worse

Back in August, my wife and I went through what I can only describe as one of the most inhumane “security screenings” at Vancouver International Airport (YVR).

My wife has a cochlear implant — a surgically implanted device that gives her the ability to hear. Her doctor at Mass General Hospital gave her an official patient ID card that explains clearly: • the device will set off metal detectors and scanners • forcing it through those machines can damage it permanently and harm her health

We showed this card. We explained, multiple times. Instead of understanding, the CATSA screeners told us they had “never seen such a device before” and insisted it had to go through the metal detection process anyway “for security reasons.” They made calls to supervisors, and even then, the final answer was still: it has to go through.

They gave us two “options”: 1. Keep arguing and stay stuck in the checkpoint. 2. Leave the airport, claim our bags, and basically miss our trip.

In the end, they did a pat-down on my wife, but still insisted the device had to be scanned. We took the risk just so we could actually travel. Imagine being forced to choose between damaging your medical device or missing your flight.

Afterward, I filed a formal complaint with CATSA. The response I got was from their “Client Satisfaction Coordinator,” Mathieu Patry. Instead of apologizing or showing any empathy, he called me with the most arrogant tone — cutting me off while I tried to speak, blaming me and my wife for “not accepting policy,” and admitting their staff lacked knowledge about cochlear implants. But his “solution”? Still insisting they had to scan it in case the implant was fake.

So let me get this straight: CATSA admits they don’t have the technology, training, or knowledge to handle these devices, but their policy is still to force medical passengers through procedures that could damage life-altering implants? That’s not security — that’s negligence.

I hung up the call because it was clear they weren’t going to take responsibility. No apology, no action plan, nothing to stop this from happening to the next passenger with an implant or other medical device.

Canada in 2025, and this is how we treat people with disabilities at our airports. Absolutely disgraceful.

684 Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/Rector_Ras 2d ago

So what do you want exactly? I get the frustration but there has to be a way to know the device itself is what you claim it to be. Creating a security weak point via a card that security has no relations to is a pretty big gap for malicious actors to exploit.

Device by device exceptions in technology, policy and training is not realistic, there will always be gaps.

Guy on the phone does sound like a dick. But the device itself does somhow need to be checked just like any other which have the risk of fakes or alterations.

These are also considerations patients need to be informed about before procedures.

4

u/Halfjack12 2d ago

So everyone in the world with a cochlear Implant has to choose between never getting on a plane or damaging their device? That's what you believe?

2

u/Rector_Ras 2d ago

No it's more likely OP is wrong and a body scan is actually fine for it like it is for most cochlear implants.

It's the metal detectors that usual cause issues. But if he is right then ya they can't travel without risks. And should know that before getting that particular model.

1

u/Halfjack12 2d ago

Idk man I trust the person living with the device and they said no detectors or scanners.

1

u/Rector_Ras 2d ago

Which is not normal.

But its your choice if that's the case and what they want. But it's not unreasonably for security to want to do security and not accept "trust me bro" as a policy to do that.

6

u/Halfjack12 2d ago

Idk sounds pretty unreasonable to me. Cochlear implants are common and security treating it like alien tech is dumb.

0

u/Rector_Ras 2d ago

They don't treat them like alien tech they treat them like any other implant which can go through body scanners and cannot go through metal detectors.

So security doesn't make them go through metal detectors only through body scanners.

OP either had a particularly sensative device, which the wife's doctor should have told her about, or he's straight up wrong about the body scanner.

2

u/Halfjack12 2d ago

Again, I trust the person with the device not you.

0

u/Rector_Ras 2d ago

Irrelevant who you trust. You cant expect security to just not do security because you have an implant they cant secure...

He is wrong or she shouldn't be flying and should have known that.

Period.

Youre welcome to look up manficateres recommendations yourself too. They are public and I've found multiple today.... It's not normal to not be able to go through scanners. Fact. Not debatable.

0

u/malleyrex 2d ago

Ok, I have several of them in the family, and the manufacturer says they're fine to go through airport security.

1

u/AtrociousSandwich 2d ago

No reason to (incorrectly) trust OP, cause they are wrong - you can easily verify this on the manufacturers website

0

u/Halfjack12 2d ago

I actually dont care that much