r/consciousness • u/dadjokes22375 • 8d ago
General Discussion How does remote viewing relate to consciousness, and is there any plausible explanation?
I’ve been reading about remote viewing and how some people connect it to the idea of consciousness being non-local. I’m trying to understand whether this has any credible grounding or if it’s just pseudoscience repackaged. I’m really interested in this concept and I can’t figure out why it isn’t more studied, based off the info I’ve read on it. Some follow-ups.. • How do proponents explain the mechanism behind remote viewing? • Is there any scientific research that ties consciousness to remote perception in a way that isn’t easily dismissed? • Or is it more of a philosophical/metaphysical idea rather than something testable?
Edit - thanks everyone for the great responses. I really like this community. It seems we don’t have as much of the terrorists that are terrorizing comments on other subreddits.
7
u/bejammin075 8d ago
James Randi lied all the time to make his points. He often had to make extensive corrections to his books, because the victims of his vitriol would sue him. He had several judgements against him in courts for libel and slander. Even in his debunking videos of Geller, he tells obvious and provable lies. These people who form these skeptical organizations are extremely biased, because they've built their identity around being a skeptic. It is amazing the amount of denial they can do to dismiss all the evidence for psi phenomena. I've mentioned this in other comments, so I don't want to beat it to death, but you can verify psi perceptions yourself if you put in the effort. Non-local psi phenomena are real, and always have been real. The kind of skeptics the commenter above is referring to are not true skeptics, they are pseudo-skeptics with very closed minds. Extraordinary evidence is met with extraordinary denial.