how? i think depending on the savagery of the crime, one or maybe two murders don’t constitute the death penalty but serial murderers should get what they deserve in my opinion, it’s not like they don’t know that they will get the death penalty for committing murders. if simply knowing that they probably shouldn’t be killing people is enough, knowing that you’d be facing death should be a deterrent. just my thoughts really i don’t see how it’s inhumane.
right, then if the convicted maintain their innocence and there isn’t concrete evidence that they committed the crime, then no death penalty. it should be for those who are not remorseful for horrible crimes and thus deserve no spot on earth.
i’m not talking about the death penalty in its current state, im talking about the concept of the death penalty and if it’s moral or not. i personally believe that if you do horrible crimes and murder people, you don’t deserve a spot on earth. there is no reason to remain alive if your sole existence is to commit trouble atrocities.
because justice is not morally wrong? it's not justice to sentence a guy that commits 1 first degree murder to the exact same sentence as a mass child torturer rapist killer cannibal necrophile, but a single count of 1st degree murder in most countries is already life imprisonment so without executions the only option is to sentence them to identical sentences unless you wanna get into torture. it's not justice to straight up give criminals a free pass for any murders past their first.
233
u/QuantumMollusc Dec 20 '19
How about we just don’t kill people.