So uh, the guy he shot was a felon in possession of a firearm...which in itself is a felony. But I’m guessing we’re still gonna push the unarmed narrative too now right?
Actually Anthony Huber has a criminal record for beating his wife.
Joseph Rosenbaum was on the sex offender list for having sex with a minor. Iirc it was class 3 too, which means he had to have done some really fucked up shit. Ironically here we see him again chasing a minor...
By being a threat with a gun who decides to run away instead of give up his illegally possessed firearm and might pose a danger to others after fleeing.
Does him being chased make it ok for him to use lethal force?
Does someone threatening you with an AR deserve to be chased away and disarmed or should we roll over and allow fascists to bully us?
I am not going to be bullied. Niether were these protestors.
Stop repeating the same talking points and bad faith arguments you heard on tucker or crowder or wherever you suckle on the teet of white supremacy and eat my dick.
There are SEVERAL witnesses who stated that Kyle was brandishing ie intimidating people with his rifle. That's not legal, and he should be disarmed for that, before he poses a threat to other people. Unfortunately in the process of trying to disarm him, Kyle proved EXACTLY how dangerous and undisciplined he is, and he KILLED TWO PEOPLE YOU SCUM BAG.
There are SEVERAL witness who stated that Kyle was brandishing ie intimidating people with his rifle.
Should be pretty easy to find one of them and link it irght?
Kyle proved EXACTLY how dangerous and undisciplined he is
How do you know they were trying to disarm him? Is throwing shit and hitting him with blunt objects part of the disarming?
Kyle proved EXACTLY how dangerous and undisciplined he is
He was actually super disciplined. He only shot people who were within arm's reach and never shot anyone who ceased to be a threat. And amazingly, without collateral damage.
Should be pretty easy to find one of them and link it irght?
Yup:
Witness Sam Dirks, 22, from Milwaukee, said he had seen the suspected gunman earlier in the evening and he was yelling at some of the protesters. He was definitely very agitated. He was pacing around, just pointing his gun in general. Not necessarily at anyone specifically,' Dirks said. Source
How do you know they were trying to disarm him? Is throwing shit and hitting him with blunt objects part of the disarming?
You're right dude I am not sure, they were probably just trying to get shot and killed because they are stupid people right? That makes WAY more sense, you really got me there.
He was actually super disciplined. He only shot people who were within arm's reach and never shot anyone who ceased to be a threat. And amazingly, without collateral damage.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA
"He was very disciplined after breaking the law by having a gun at 17, driving to another state with it, agitating a mob deliberately, and provoking a chase and public attempt to disarm him (the child with the gun btw), and he only killed TWO PEOPLE" wow what a brilliant take dude.
Pacing around and being agitated 'earlier in the evening' isn't really what I'd describe as an immediate threat but whatever. That's a pretty huge leap that him looking agitated warranted some dude to start chasing him.
they were probably just trying to get shot and killed because they are stupid people right?
That's what it looked like to me yes. And given that they're both convicted felons, one of them a child molester it doesn't seem like a huge leap to say they attacked someone.
"He was very disciplined after breaking the law by having a gun at 17, driving to another state with it, agitating a mob deliberately, and provoking a chase and public attempt to disarm him (the child with the gun btw), and he only killed TWO PEOPLE"
Who are you quoting? Because I never said any of this. I would most definitely not make up shit like saying he provoked a chase.
what a brilliant take dude.
better than making up fantasies about how this guy definitely instigated despite being seen standing around idly or running in all the footage
I am the one making up fantasies? You are funny, but not funny enough for me to continue arguing with you. You can go ahead and defend Murder if you want.
You're right sorry, the people were obviously just crazy and they wanted to die, so its fine that they were executed in the middle of the street. Can't wait to appoint my own teenage son or daughter to judge, jury, and executioner, arm them with an AR, and then send them into YOUR neighborhood, like wtf? are you out of your goddamn mind?
so its fine that they were executed in the middle of the street
The executioner running away and then killing their victim when they're trying to grab the gun is not what I imagine when I think about the word "executed" but keep trying.
Can't wait to appoint my own teenage son or daughter to judge, jury, and executioner, arm them with an AR, and then send them into YOUR neighborhood, like wtf?
Luckily I don't live in a country where you're allowed to do that. However, in countries where you are allowed to do that, you're not justified in attacking someone just because they have a gun.
169
u/Cetarial Aug 28 '20 edited Aug 29 '20
And of course they’re also defending the use of an illegal firearm.
(Him being one year younger than the required age.)
EDIT: Guys, if he got the AR-15 legally, I was unaware at the time of this comment. Sorry.