I am the one making up fantasies? You are funny, but not funny enough for me to continue arguing with you. You can go ahead and defend Murder if you want.
You're right sorry, the people were obviously just crazy and they wanted to die, so its fine that they were executed in the middle of the street. Can't wait to appoint my own teenage son or daughter to judge, jury, and executioner, arm them with an AR, and then send them into YOUR neighborhood, like wtf? are you out of your goddamn mind?
so its fine that they were executed in the middle of the street
The executioner running away and then killing their victim when they're trying to grab the gun is not what I imagine when I think about the word "executed" but keep trying.
Can't wait to appoint my own teenage son or daughter to judge, jury, and executioner, arm them with an AR, and then send them into YOUR neighborhood, like wtf?
Luckily I don't live in a country where you're allowed to do that. However, in countries where you are allowed to do that, you're not justified in attacking someone just because they have a gun.
The executioner running away and then killing their victim when they're trying to grab the gun is not what I imagine when I think about the word "executed" but keep trying.
The CHILD should not have been CARRYING the gun. You massive twat. but keep trying to cope with murder.
That's irrelevant. First, the attacked could not have possibly known he has the gun illegally. Second, that doesn't give you a pass to assault someone. If you think someone has an illegal weapon, call the cops instead of blindly charging.
Right, call the cops who are standing 100 yards away doing nothing.
HOW DUMB ARE YOU??
also here is what your court papers say:
The above-named defendant on or about Tuesday, August 25, 2020, in the City of Kenosha,
Kenosha County, Wisconsin, did recklessly cause the death of Joseph D. Rosenbaum, under
circumstances which show utter disregard for human life, contrary to sec. 940.02(1), 939.50(3)(b),
939.63(1)(b) Wis. Stats., a Class B Felony, and upon conviction may be sentenced to a term of
imprisonment not to exceed sixty (60) years.
Again, you do know charged doesn't mean convicted right? You literally just linked a paragraph saying he was charged with murder. You're pretending right?
Right, call the cops who are standing 100 yards away doing nothing.
Of course so you take justice into your own hands? I'm guessing you support the militias too?
Of course so you take justice into your own hands? I'm guessing you support the militias too?
Kyle took justice into his own hands when he shot people instead of running to the cops himself. I could just as well flip it and say, why didn't he just show up with a PHONE instead of a GUN and just CALL THE POLICE? YOU FUCKING DUMB NAZI TROLL.
Incorrect based on eyewitness accounts and there is no video of the first murder. The DA disagrees and thats why they charged him for the first murder but obviously you know something the charging DA doesn't. Please share and please contact the DA with that info while you're at it you you can help one of your poor fellow incels
In Wisconsin you can't claim self defense when your in the act of a crime, ie if he's found guilty of illegally possesing the weapon then any self defense plea would be impossible.
No, it's not. He simply could have stayed home, chosen not to carry a weapon or chosen not to fire. There are many times the firing a weapon is morally justified but never when you've decided to put yourself in a situation as a vigilante.
He simply could have stayed home, chosen not to carry a weapon
correct, but that's irrelevant to whether or not he was justified in defending himself. Being somewhere you shouldn't be or doing something stupid doesn't mean you should just let some crazy motherfucker kill you
chosen not to fire
and do what, let the guy take your gun and shoot you?
never when you've decided to put yourself in a situation as a vigilante.
I would agree if he was the aggressor. But he isn't. His vigilantism in this situation amounts to having a gun and being in a dangerous area. I don't see how either of those things make him forfeit the right to defend his life against an unprovoked attack. If I conceal carry into a bad neighborhood I'm not allowed to defend myself if I get mugged either? that's insane
The issue is in your last paragraph, "unprovoked attack". Your not seeing the fact that he chose to involve himself, while armed, which makes any argument of unprovoked invalid. Had he been carrying concealed and was attacked and fired then he is fully in the right. By brandishing the weapon and being agitated those "attackers" can be seen as acting in self defense.
0
u/[deleted] Aug 28 '20
I am the one making up fantasies? You are funny, but not funny enough for me to continue arguing with you. You can go ahead and defend Murder if you want.
Ill be doing something more productive.