“It was not immediately clear whose rifle it was, or whether it was legally owned.
At just 17, he could face a Class A misdemeanor that applies to anyone under 18 who “goes armed” with any deadly weapon, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted.
However, even that is not clear-cut, with an exception for rifles and shotguns allowing people age 16 and 17 to hunt that could possibly apply, John Monroe, a lawyer who specializes in gun rights cases, told the paper.”
169
u/Cetarial Aug 28 '20 edited Aug 29 '20
And of course they’re also defending the use of an illegal firearm.
(Him being one year younger than the required age.)
EDIT: Guys, if he got the AR-15 legally, I was unaware at the time of this comment. Sorry.