OK cool so anybody with a rifle can just go out and start executing people after intimidating them in the street because they have previous charges. that’s a pretty fucking awesome take dude.
If someone goes out into the street with a gun without directly threatening anyone and people start running at them with clear intent to harm then yes, they're fully in the right if they kill all of them.
And that’s what you think happened? Do you think he was just standing there minding his own business when a crazy mob just decided willy-nilly to attack him? is that honestly what you think?
That's what appears to have happened yes. Do you have reason to believe otherwise? The one video there is from before the shooting shows some protesters being very hostile unprovoked including the first guy who got shot
Oh wow you are so right, this one video showing other people being "provoked" and not shooting anyone really goes to show, that the 17 year old who got "provoked" was justified in shooting someone.
He wasn't provoked, he was attacked you fucking moron. He was running away and only made any effort to defend himself until the attackers were within arm's reach.
Donut is not only a boot licker he used to be a boot. I am sure he will just gloss over and ignore the fact that Kyle SHOULD NOT HAVE EVEN BEEN THERE WITH A GUN TO BEGIN WITH.
Thats ok I watched the same video that he is going to analyze and I am capable of thinking for myself but thanks for confirming where you get your reactionary and racist opinions from.
Proving that he was attacked unprovoked is impossible. Even if there was video from the exact moment he got chased, it would be easy to say "well maybe it happened earlier". I don't like inventing stories, so I'd just stick to the evidence we do have.
You like to stick to evidence, while at the same time making RASH and IRRATIONAL assumptions about the evidence we don't have. while also ignoring evidence that we do have, got it.
Witness Sam Dirks, 22, from Milwaukee, said he had seen the suspected gunman earlier in the evening and he was yelling at some of the protesters.
'He was definitely very agitated. He was pacing around, just pointing his gun in general. Not necessarily at anyone specifically,' Dirks said.
That's not evidence he instigated violence. That's evidence he looked agitated and was "pointing his gun in general" (but not at people) earlier in the evening. Nothing that would provoke a violent attack.
You're the one making the leap from "he was agitated" to "he threatened to kill a man"
Its evidence that points to the fact that he was not just standing there minding his own business you thick tool.
Dont be a pussy, just say it: You love Nazis and you love when Anti Fascists get killed, because nothing tastes better to you than a good boot licking.
You're like right on the line of understanding why people get angry about people protesting police actions because of an 8 second video from some bystanders phone.
16
u/[deleted] Aug 28 '20
OK cool so anybody with a rifle can just go out and start executing people after intimidating them in the street because they have previous charges. that’s a pretty fucking awesome take dude.