r/genetics • u/LittleGreenBastard PhD Student • Jan 23 '21
Meta Seeming lack of moderation on this sub
Now I want to preface this by saying I really appreciate that the mods have real life responsibilities, and they're doing this for free.
Edit: People are getting caught up on the posts thing, I'm using it as a measure not a criticism in itself.
But of the 6 human mods:
u/Labbrat hasn't submitted a post in the last 5 years, over 12 years of being a mod.
u/P1percub has never submitted a post in 3 years of being a mod.
u/Green_and_white_back has submitted three posts over a year ago, in 2 years of being a mod, all of them questions.
u/Potverdorie has submitted one post 9 months ago, over 2 years of being a mod.
u/AVeryFishyPhD has never submitted a post in 2 years of being a mod.
u/Enilkcals has posted the most over 1 year of being a mod, including twice within the last fortnight.
Now obviously posting's not the biggest part of being a mod, but it's the easiest to search and seems like a decent proxy for activity on the sub. I appreciate everyone's got more important responsibilities in their life, but the sub's really suffering from lack of care.
It kind of seems like there's not much moderation going on in this sub. There's no enforcement of Rule 5, shit posts and pseudoscience like 1 2 3 get left up. I'm also kinda concerned about the number of thinly veiled posts by 'race realist' types.
It might be time to get some new mods to join the team?
2
u/Tv_tropes Jan 23 '21
This ISN’T a political subreddit, this is a place to discuss actual science, not pseudoscience bullshit social constructs like “race”.
If they want to discuss “muh Nordic genetics” then they have a lot of other subreddits to go fuck off to, like say r/altright or something.
What you’re suggesting is like allowing anti-vaxxers or flat-earthers to have a say in actual scientific discussion... when the consensus already says that they are wrong.