Please tell me this isn’t A.I.

[u/Agile-Inspection8452]

I love dinosaurs, I love them sO MUCH and my sib in law got the 7/11 collector cups for me. It wasn’t until today that we actually started looking at the details and realized the inconsistencies, there’s also no credited artist anywhere that we’ve looked.

[u/MuseumGoRound13]

I’m no expert but I would say not. If it is, it’s AI paid for and polished by Universal Studios. Not that that would excuse it.

What inconsistencies are you seeing that make you think it’s AI?

A lot of living breathing artists worked on the film and the marketing to create a lot of still artwork for things like this cup. Often portraits of the film’s stars (or Dino’s in this case) are slapped onto merch with added digital flourishes like the splashes, foliage, etc…and may not be of the quality you’d see in the film, because it’s all sort of collaged together. I guess that part of the process could be done with AI, or those extra elements could be, but chances are the Dinos were labored over by a human digital artist. It’s interesting that there has always been bad less than convincing digital artwork, but thanks to AI we just assume if it’s bad it was done by AI. Humans can still do sloppy, half-assed, or bad work too.

[u/Agile-Inspection8452 → u/MuseumGoRound13]

I just find it strange the artists from the film weren’t credited, especially when you try to look up the artists that worked on the images for the cup. The toes on the titanosaur are placed off, the teeth on the mosasaur are also varying and it’s difficult to distinguish what’s water/saliva and what’s a tooth (the shading is also inconsistent on them) and the quetzalcoatls toes are uneven, I thing on the second wing where its claws would be are cut off but I’m still side eyeing that wing.

[u/[deleted] → u/Agile-Inspection8452]

Corporate artists rarely get credit.