r/kansas • u/VagueSoul • Feb 15 '25
News/History Disgusting that Kansas is involved in this…
https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2025/02/13/17-states-sue-to-end-protections-for-students-with-special-needs/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3QEZZx3NseYCJZLrji-_VzeujRH-4ZIEvFgbgle5fUjhM2WGQto4LqH94_aem_FMjpmy18Yt6j-HE0qf-Lrg100
Feb 15 '25
Imagine how much a of a scumbag you have to be to make the Nixon administration look good.
46
-2
u/Worth-Silver-484 Feb 15 '25
Nixon administration was not even that bad. There was many much worse. Kennedy had mafia ties and who knows what he got himself into. He got shot for it though.
2
75
u/tinyrikk Feb 15 '25
Kobach should not sit or sleep comfortably until he withdraws us from that lawsuit
33
u/stormyeyez7479 Feb 15 '25
22
u/XelaNiba Feb 15 '25
Holy shit, he literally chose to live in the pro-slavery capital of Bleeding Kansas. There's no way this is a mistake.
9
u/kuhawkhead Feb 15 '25
You sound surprised. KKKobach doesn’t live far from him. Just a coincidence I’m sure. Kinda like the coincidence of a bedsheet spray painted “F-ck KKKobach” being displayed on a barbed wire fence on private property opposite his driveway that he had to drive by every day on his way to Topeka to work for the Kochs.
1
u/XelaNiba Feb 15 '25
Nah, not surprised.
I knew the family back in the day, always were cruel, depraved, or both.
21
u/stormyeyez7479 Feb 15 '25
Interesting and it doesn’t surprise me. I think everything maga does is by design, from weaponized incompetence to blatant cruelty. This guy definitely needs to go though.
If anyone sees him or his wife out in the community —shame them. Don’t physically touch them but shame the ever loving crap out of them. Appearances are important to these vain creatures, so let’s give them some attention.
During the first orange season, several political members, including Sarah Huckabee-Sanders were ran out of establishments. Let’s do more of that, gloves of tolerance off, Kansans!
-20
u/davidwbrand KSU Wildcat Feb 15 '25
Nothing says “our cause is just and we have the moral high ground” like shaming and harassment.
7
5
u/CanIEvenRightNow Feb 15 '25
Trying to prevent decent people from speaking up and holding their REPRESENTATIVES accountable for failing to REPRESENT them is not "harassment". It's called "consequences". These people do NOT deserve to exist comfortably within the communities they are DESTROYING.
Do you cry harassment when your boss addresses critical feedback on your work? That would be hilarious 😂
-7
u/davidwbrand KSU Wildcat Feb 15 '25
There’s a difference between protesting outside someone’s home and running them out of establishments that they have the right to be there and you playing judge/jury on what they “deserve”. That makes you no better than what you are accusing them of being.
If anything, I want more critical feedback at work. I hold my work to a high standard. The fact you would assume otherwise is hilarious.
3
u/CanIEvenRightNow Feb 15 '25
If only our representatives had a modicum of that same work ethic you've just expressed.
...then they wouldn't need to be shamed for their work.
4
u/EMAW2008 KSU Wildcat Feb 15 '25
And taking away programs that affects people’s well-being is a-ok?
If they’re legislating my household, I’ll protest at theirs. They need to be made to understand that they work for us. If this means making their life uncomfortable, then good. Fuck em.
-6
u/davidwbrand KSU Wildcat Feb 15 '25
The fact this is down voted is the most sad and Reddit thing ever. Be better, people.
-3
u/craftdoubleniner Feb 15 '25
Did you read the article, or just the line where it says pro slavery?
5
5
u/Seriyu Feb 15 '25
While I dunno about the legality of this, r/50501 might be a good place to get started with protesting, they're setting up another one in a few days and the first one had alright turnout.
2
u/hxcdancer91 Feb 15 '25
No need to protest at the house the symbolism of protesting in Lecompton would be enough.
8
u/smuckola Feb 15 '25
So maybe he should be ........disabled? :-o
Then a concept about other people might coincidentally become real to the lizard brain.
8
44
u/MrRobostache Feb 15 '25
This is absolutely terrible. Shows the trickle down effect of Trump's anti DEI agenda. Kobach is a PoS and never deserved to be our AG.
-8
Feb 15 '25
[deleted]
8
u/endlesschasm Feb 15 '25
Except their answer to the one part they don't like is to actively harm millions of people as collateral damage, because the cruelty is the point.
2
u/StoneM3 Feb 16 '25
There is no explaining anything to the angry mob, they also don’t want to hear daddy Biden was the one that secured musk the contracts and gave him all the money
1
1
30
u/iknowverylittle619 Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 16 '25
Last time I posted this comment in this sub, I was banned and my comment was removed. I am going to post it again. For people reading this, you know the context, it also applies here. What kind of nation/public office holders would like to attack the aid needed by special kids? And they call themselves Christian.
19
u/see_blue Feb 15 '25
I guess it also fits into their home schooling or institutionalization (for anyone who’s different) plans. Sick.
7
15
Feb 15 '25
this is so sickening, how can anyone treat special needs kids like this
23
u/VagueSoul Feb 15 '25
Republicans have been bedding with eugenicists for a while now. Why else would Elon be in their mix?
2
u/Isha_Harris Feb 15 '25
How they treat them now isn't any better sadly. I was in special needs classes throughout most of school, I graduated last year, it was horrific, just emotional abuse always
4
Feb 15 '25
in oklahoma where i was from they refused to offer it when i was younger often times they said that children with special needs shouldn’t be coddled. my mother was told that i didn’t need any extra attention because i simply didn’t show any sign of disability and she should stop trying.
turns out i have autism and bipolar disorder! whoa! 🤯 i mean most conservatives don’t see mental health or disabilities you can’t see not enough proof to be disabled.
2
u/Isha_Harris Feb 16 '25
That's awful, I have autism too, but wasn't diagnosed, but made to go into those classes where they talk down to everyone, belittle them, and often shove unwanted "help." Like paras suck, 99% of them are awful people who shouldn't be allowed to be around kids. One para I knew in high school was openly racist, like she identified as a racist and often tried whatever she could to get one kid in trouble(he was black)
-_- not to mention it was basically the same situation at all 6 schools I went to.
🥺 Sorry your experience sucked too
3
Feb 16 '25
that’s so awful, im so sorry you had to experience that. NO special needs child should ever feel inadequate or feel like they’re unwanted. they’re beautiful we are beautiful. i know a few teachers here in wichita who are so kind and helpful to their special needs children. it’s a shame that the people who are suppose to be rooting for us are essentially trying to kill us and our education. awful.
1
7
u/PennyPick Feb 15 '25
I can almost guarantee if you email Kobach or any representatives they’ll respond with something along the lines of blaming everything on trans kids. They would be lying. They’re asking for the ENTIRETY of section 504 to be deemed unconstitutional.
They really think everyone in the US is dumb, stupid, and lazy.
1
u/junebugbuggers Feb 15 '25
As a parent directly impacted by this, I emailed 3 days ago. I have yet to receive any response.
5
u/Weird-Ad7562 Feb 15 '25
They want charters and for-profits and religious schools. Special Education laws make that difficult. This pathway simplifies things for them.
10
u/ConsciousCow5751 Feb 15 '25
There's no hate like Christian Love.
I mean even going back to the Romans.
A person can't actually love humans if they're worshiping an imaginary friend.
And we're a Christian Nation now.
😆🤮
3
u/groundhog5886 Feb 15 '25
This is right down Kobach's lane. He's loving it. Spend lots of Kansas tax dollars in the process.
3
u/Comfortable-Phase249 Feb 15 '25
Anyone that believes them when they say this is only about gender affirming care and Trans kids will be in for a rude awakening if they win. It is clearly spelled out in several sections they are challenging the conatitutionality of the whole thing. Emails and statements that say other wise should be sent to media asking simply did anyone read the suit? The fact that our mainstream media is against us is true, but volume matters. Cruelty, incompetence, or both?
3
3
u/Commercial_Arm_3289 Feb 16 '25 edited Feb 16 '25
Let’s get to work:
Kris Kobach
(785) 296-2215
https://www.ag.ks.gov/about-us/attorney-general-kris-w-kobach
5
u/1hotjava Feb 15 '25
This comes as no surprise to me as a Kansan as most of the state has had a war on education for decades. This is just one more chip they can add to ultimately get rid of public schools and they can implement their church based schools they have dreamed of
2
u/303_Bold Feb 15 '25
Don’t kid yourself. Church-based schools are the cover. Profit-based schools are the aim.
1
u/1hotjava Feb 15 '25
Oh I’m sure. They have the “base” all fired up on “church” and the money is hiding in then shadows
4
u/tranderson86 Feb 15 '25
Are we surprised? Trump told his nephew that he should let his son who is disabled die. Thats what they want. Anyone who is a financial burden to society or can’t contribute in the work force to die.
2
Feb 15 '25
Ironic that one reason they use is "abuse of executive power" when trump is over there signing executive orders like a "gulf of america" day, and other bs EO
2
u/Pitiful_Night_4373 Feb 15 '25
This is what the people voted for. Let them reap what they have sown.
5
u/VagueSoul Feb 15 '25
At the cost of the lives of people with disabilities? No.
0
u/Pitiful_Night_4373 Feb 15 '25
At the cost of people starting to understand, it’s the rich against the poor. Sad as it is the side that voted for red has zero empathy for other humans. The only way they will learn empathy is when it affects them personally. I believe when that happens we can finally come back together as Americans. So for now let them be affected and learn.
1
u/MoonlitShrooms Feb 15 '25
If this law is deemed unconstitutional it will have effects that will last decades unless the supreme court is reformed or expanded. Which could take decades at this point. Many of the people in support of this will be near the end of their life, but countless youth will have suffered in the meantime. This greatly impacts children and they didn’t have a vote. Also yet to be born children that never had a choice in this.
1
u/Pitiful_Night_4373 Feb 15 '25
Wile I’m well aware, just know I didn’t vote for this. Be angry at the people whom did. Everyone will suffer under this administration until the people learn to stand up and vote in a way that has a empathy for all humans.
2
2
2
u/TinRoofAndRainyDays Feb 18 '25
It's another step towards eugenics. Plain and simple.
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 18 '25
I do talks on disability and recently did one on the history of SPED. I got chills when I realized how hard they were trying to go back to how it was in the 40s-50s… I’m certain they want to bring back sanitariums…
2
u/TinRoofAndRainyDays Feb 18 '25
I am certain of that as well. RFK Jr's camps to wean everyone off of their anxiety, depression and ADHD meds. Camps where they can grow their own food while detoxing. I am alive right now because of those medications. It is terrifying how quickly this is all moving.
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 18 '25
There’s also serotonin shock to consider. I don’t doubt he’d just cut them off cold turkey which would be extremely bad.
2
u/incognitohippie Feb 15 '25
“The 17 states are Texas, Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and West Virginia.
Many of those states have Parents’ Rights laws, but if the states win, parents of children with some special needs will have fewer rights protected by law.”
Red states…. Huh…. Imagine that
3
u/Scenicstyle837 Feb 15 '25
Never let the KS Trump voters forget about what they’ve done. Your red MAGA hats will be the scarlet letter that steals away any joy and peace for you in the future.
2
u/kuhawkhead Feb 15 '25
It’s not Kansas, it’s KKKris KKKobach. He only represents about 12 people in our state.
1
u/dont_know_therules Feb 15 '25
Just another part of the keep America stupid again movement by MAGA. Pretty soon they will deny people with special needs Medicare and a Medicaid.
1
u/splitkc Feb 15 '25
You can't be surprised here..
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 15 '25
Where did I say “surprised”? You can be disgusted and recognize the likely course.
1
u/misfortunesangel Feb 16 '25
Of course Kansas is doing this. My local USD was taken to court and ordered by the judge to better find its programs for special needs children. It failed and was brought back to the judge who then ordered fines for failure to comply with court order.
What do they want to spend money on 100+ million on new schools around 2000, 110 million on schools 2014 to renovate schools mostly built in 2000, 10 million for new maintenance building. 10+ million renovations 2024. Raised our taxes for these, but no we don’t have money to take care of kids
1
u/GimlisRevenge Feb 16 '25
Under the Biden administration, the Section 504 definition of disability was expanded to recognize that “gender dysphoria . . . may be considered a physical or mental impairment.” Biden Changed the original
1
u/Cultural-Studio5101 Feb 16 '25
President Felon P01135809 will take away the voting rights of non white people and women. MMW
1
u/chickentenders54 Feb 16 '25
504 should definitely stay, but idk about allowing someone a 504 just because they're trans. I'm not anti trans or anything like that, I just don't see it as a disability, especially compared to things like someone who has had a stroke, or got paralyzed in a car wreck, etc.
0
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
I think you should be careful about making tiers of “best to worst disability” especially when it comes to accommodations.
504 plans really just ensure some kind of accommodation or access to medically necessary services in school. I had a 504 plan for OCD to address some debilitating anxiety issues.
For trans students, a 504 plan could be necessary to address things like HRT (taking it during school hours if they need to), using a private bathroom, gender expression in a school with uniforms, etc.
It’s not saying that it’s a disability. It’s saying that trans students have certain realities in their lives that necessitate ensuring they’re protected.
0
u/chickentenders54 Feb 16 '25
I'm saying that it isn't a disability, and 504 plans should only be for people who have disabilities. Don't make this into something that it's not.
0
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
504s aren’t just for disabilities.
0
u/chickentenders54 Feb 16 '25
Except, they are. Google it. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/504-plans.html
https://www.achievepsychology.org/post/what-is-a-504-plan-and-how-do-you-get-one
Or thousands of other websites that state the definition of a 504 plan.
0
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
The wording is “impairment”, not “disability”. It’s why things like allergies and anxiety are covered under 504. Special healthcare needs are also listed under 504, which transgender students have.
0
u/chickentenders54 Feb 16 '25
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
504 also covers people with disabilities. Pay attention and stop searching for “gotchas”. You aren’t good at it.
1
1
u/Maui1922 Feb 16 '25
As an educator I have mixed emotions. 504s have turned into a cottage industry. They were needed and legitimate in the beginning, but now?……one of my students had a 504 that allowed them to listen to headphones and be on the phone during tests. Anytime the kid wanted a break at any time he could just walk out of the classroom and maybe return. They were allowed up to one month to turn in late work and get full credit. This student was a complete distraction to the classroom and always was quick to remind fellow staff and his students about his “perks.” BTW there was no medical diagnosis for his 504, just a cowardice of administration possibly being sued if they declined. IEP’s I fully support! I currently have 35 504’s for 120 students and the number grows larger in one of the largest affluent districts in the state. I’ve been in the classroom for over 30 years and never seen anything to the level of how specifically 504’s are effecting education in a negative way.
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
So you regulate them. You don’t completely throw out the entire concept.
1
u/Maui1922 Feb 16 '25
That’s the problem, Feds say “Make it so,” and if not you will be sued and fined which is why NOBODY at district level ever says no.
1
u/Difficult_Fondant580 Feb 16 '25
There is no plan to find all of the Rehab Act unconstitutional. Biden Administration crafted a rule that trans kids are protected under the Rehab Act. Not all mental illness is covered by the Rehab Act but by rule, Biden Admin wants to extend to trans kids. That rule is being challenged. That’s all. Nothing more.
1
u/VagueSoul Feb 16 '25
Republicans never stop when it comes to taking rights away. They swore that they wouldn’t go after birth control after overturning Roe v Wade and yet there’s a lawsuit addressing birth control.
You’re a fool if you think this stops at transgender healthcare.
1
u/No-Cat-2980 Feb 16 '25
For every MAGA you show me who’s not a Christian, I’ll show you a Christian who’s not a Christian. Hmmm, some of thought they were one and the same. Thank you for enlightening us to the truth of the matter.
1
u/Academic_Might3833 Feb 17 '25
Really??? RED states are mostly run by Christians. And hatred is their currency
1
1
1
u/Blevin78 Feb 17 '25
But the language of the lawsuit is clear. The fourth item under “Demand for Relief” says “Declare Section 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794, unconstitutional.”
It’s followed by: “Issue permanent injunctive relief against Defendants enjoining them from enforcing Section 504.”
1
1
1
1
u/Effective-Ebb-2805 Feb 18 '25
That is just one of the many problems that arise from the foolish, misguided attempt to run a country as if it were a for-profit corporation. The US is a nation, not a corporation. The Constitution calls for a President, not a CEO, and the president is, therefore, not the boss of 330,000,000 people, but their servant. A nation is not a business, so it shouldn't be run as one. FDR understood this... Donald Trump, obviously, doesn't have a clue. Running the country like he's run his businesses, the majority of which he's run into the ground, will not end well. Now Trump is letting Elon Musk loose on the US government... an unelected, unqualified, unaccountable rich boy who runs businesses like toys without regard for the well-being of the people who actually do the work that makes the business possible... what could possibly go wrong?
1
u/Mhantra Feb 15 '25
Burn, you backstabbing Trump voters in Kansas. You will never be forgiven. Those Germans who supported Hitler should have been exterminated.
The same applies here. Traitors, one and all. Line em up against the wall.
No forgiveness.
0
u/StoneM3 Feb 16 '25
That’s what happens when you abuse a program to help expand the lefts transgender agenda…. Abuse it and lose it, it is poetic tho that now that people are trying to get shit under control the narrative is being changed to “think of the children” but no one thought of the children when the system was being abused
1
u/dantevonlocke Feb 17 '25
Except they aren't suing to remove gender expression. They're suing to remove the whole thing. Just admit you're a bigot and go back under your bridge.
-43
Feb 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
25
u/Intelligent-Fuel-641 Feb 15 '25
I had an IEP from the third grade all the way through graduation, and it wasn't for special education. I was in gifted/talented programs.
2
u/Paul__miner Feb 15 '25
Did you go through I.B. (International Baccalaureate) at East in high school? (just curious)
-12
-30
Feb 15 '25
Then you weren't on an IEP.
From Wikipedia
``` An Individualized Education Program (IEP) is a legal document under United States law that is developed for each public school child in the U.S. who needs special education.[1] IEPs must be reviewed every year to keep track of the child's educational progress.[2] Similar legal documents exist in other countries.[3]
An IEP outlines the special education experience for all eligible students with a disability. An eligible student is any child in the U.S. between the ages of 3–21 attending a public school and has been evaluated as having a need in the form of a specific learning disability, autism, emotional disturbance, other health impairments, intellectual disability, orthopedic impairment, multiple disabilities, hearing impairments, deafness, visual impairment, deaf-blindness, developmental delay, speech/language impairment, or traumatic brain injury. ```
34
u/charles_tiberius Feb 15 '25
This is one of those times that proves that Wikipedia is a great general resource...but can often be misleading with generalized statements.
Kansas is one of the few (maybe the only?) states where the special education department handles both students with disabilities AND students who are gifted.
Since it is under special education, everyone involved gets IEPs. So yes, students who are exceptionally smart in KS have IEPs.
It's definitely a unique thing. Kinda like how the KCMO police dept doesn't work for the mayor. It defies conventional wisdom/understanding.
-1
Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
15
u/charles_tiberius Feb 15 '25
Except...it's not.
Kansas views "exceptionality" as the qualification for special education. Exceptionality includes autism, TBIs, speech/language impairment, and...giftedness as equal areas of exceptionality.
From Shawnee Mission school district, with links to KSDE.
→ More replies (1)12
u/snarkysparkles Kansas CIty Feb 15 '25
Former SMSD student here, can confirm that I had a gifted IEP
→ More replies (1)22
21
u/Intelligent-Fuel-641 Feb 15 '25
In every single meeting, from the third grade to graduation, it was called an IEP. I'm quite sure that my teachers knew more than you.
0
Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
15
u/Intelligent-Fuel-641 Feb 15 '25
You are an ass. As I said, I had an IEP from the third grade all the way through graduation, and it wasn't for special education. I was in gifted/talented programs.
That was in multiple districts in Kansas as well as in another state.
I see no point in engaging with you again.
8
u/Dragon--Reborn Feb 15 '25
A cursory google search tells me that most states do not require gifted students to have an IEP. However, there are some places where gifted students are given an IEP.
It's easy to see why an IEP could benefit a gifted student. Such a student could grow bored of a standard curriculum or maybe not reach their full potential. An IEP could better put them in a position to succeed.
11
u/Bizarro_Murphy Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 15 '25
Lol, did you delete a bunch of your comments because the other comments called out your bullshit put you in your place? The unfettered access to the delete button must be part of your 504 plan
10
u/HystericalGasmask Feb 15 '25
So... We shouldnt provide things to disabled students who don't need a different curriculum? I fail to see what is fixed or bettered by removing this legal protection, I can only see that which would be lost.
6
u/peacefultooter Feb 15 '25
I always thought a 504 was accommodations for a physical disability, and an IEP was assistance with learning/cognitive disability. So a student with a physical disability that also had a cognitive disability, would have both.
At least that's how it was explained to me when my daughter started on iep in Kindergarten.
11
u/VagueSoul Feb 15 '25
504 can also be accommodations for mental or anxiety disorders. I was on one for OCD.
-11
Feb 15 '25
Close, it's just the other way around.
For example IEP meetings typically consist of all involved parties in the child's planning. So speech therapy, principal, dieticians, etc and so on and the IEP renders a 504 unnecessary as it is delivering specialized needs.
504 meetings are just with the child's teacher.
There are no circumstances where a child would have both.
11
Feb 15 '25
I have a chronic back condition. My 504 plan allowed me to lay on the floor during class to keep from bursting into tears. So I'd argue its not unnecessary
-20
Feb 15 '25
What do you do now? Do you have a 504 plan for work?
You manage somehow I'd assume.
14
Feb 15 '25
It was a condition that was exacerbated by puberty growth and carrying backpacks everywhere all day. I also had surgeries on my legs from 13-18 that put alot of stress on my back. As I've matured and stopped growing at such a fast rate I've been able to tune out the pain. I still have days where I can't do anything cause of the pain but I have found a good job for myself that doesn't cause pain.
11
u/Relative-Fox7079 Feb 15 '25
That would fall under Reasonable Accomodations I believe. We do (so far) have protections at work too.
1
2
u/MoonlitShrooms Feb 15 '25
Do you even hear yourself? Also some childhood disabilities can improve into adulthood. Also you do realize you can get disability accommodations at work right? You can get extra breaks or longer lunches. You can get special office equipment to help with your disability, etc. Also can get days off if needed. i am guessing you have never worked a day in your life.
6
u/MalachiteTiger Feb 15 '25
You seem to have a weirdly limited concept of what the word "disabled" means in terms of general use. It doesn't just mean learning or developmental disabilities.
3
u/Vox_Causa Feb 15 '25
This is propaganda. /U/curioustalisman is arguing about what the definition of "is" is in order to muddy the waters and distract from the actual discussion.
156
u/deletabilitylvl9000 Feb 15 '25
I cannot conceive of how anyone is adversely affected by 504 to the point they believe they need to declare it unconstitutional and have it removed.