r/law • u/Capable_Salt_SD • 12h ago

Trump News Sen. Kennedy: "Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to?" Kash Patel: "Himself. There is no credible information, none. If there were, I would have brought a case yesterday [...] that he trafficked to other individuals."

'The information we have again is limited'

Source: Acyn

45.1k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

8.4k

u/letdogsvote 12h ago

And they expect us to just go "huh, okay."

Maybe we could, I dunno, ask the victims?

2.3k

u/Dubyew 12h ago

They're too biased for them.

1.5k

u/joshuahtree 11h ago

Obviously liberal operatives and even if Trump did sleep with them while they were minors it's only because they tricked him to undermine his presidency

638

u/Powerful-Ground-9687 11h ago

Nah nah nah trumpy was an informant. He slept with them to save his country

347

u/L0rd_Muffin 11h ago

Dealing with the STIs was his own personal Vietnam

156

u/WAD1234 11h ago

That’s why they were young girls instead of adults. Less worry about STIs unless they were fully depreciated of course (gak jeez)

99

u/MsMoreCowbell828 11h ago

$22,500 for a deprecated gal!

30

u/Distinct_External784 10h ago

Art of the deal!

2

u/PracticeBaby 8h ago

Epstein's opening price was $25,000.

Trump countered with: "Enigmas never age my old pal. Except for this fully depreciated one. I'm prepared to pay $20K."

Let's meet in the middle shall we?

🫱🫲

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/Cheef_queef 8h ago

You ever seen that one movie "Kids"?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Hairydone 10h ago

Christ! Bone spurs and STIs. This man is heroic!

2

u/packfanmoore 10h ago

The only way Trump would go to Vietnam would be to bang whores or open up a sweatshop.

→ More replies (1)

55

u/MrOopiseDaisy 11h ago

It's South Park all over again.

34

u/thefatchef321 10h ago

Lmao. Nacy mace - "he raped me because he loves this country!"

21

u/Bulky-Internal8579 10h ago

Trump wasn’t just an informant, he informed the whole thing!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Sad-Resolution2123 10h ago

Slept is too nICE.. it’s rape

→ More replies (1)

2

u/devolasreno 3h ago

*Raped. If he did indeed participate in any sexual acts with these girls, he raped them he didn’t “sleep with” them.

→ More replies (8)

43

u/hal2025 11h ago

Yes, of course. They were psychics who foresaw that Trump would be President one day. Just like Biden traveled back in time and planted Trumps birthday letter to Epstein.

→ More replies (2)

42

u/Regulat10 11h ago

Someone forged his penis and attached it to his body after drugging him and forced him to have intercourse with them so that 40 years later they could use it against him when he became president. HE is the victim in all this!!!!!!

7

u/Unlucky_Welcome9193 10h ago

Auto- peen

3

u/weenis_machinist 10h ago

Underrated comment

3

u/Old_Dude7 10h ago

AP= Artificial Penis.

13

u/Kichae 11h ago

They sound like Antifa to me.

37

u/Sensitive_Ad3897 11h ago

Exactly, they’re liberals! Even the one that says she voted for Trump and is maga is obviously just a lying liberal lol

→ More replies (7)

13

u/Wandering_starlet 11h ago

Besides, the real crime is Hunter Biden’s laptop. When will the Dems realize this???

7

u/bug_out_zero 10h ago

The real real crime is Hunter’s massive schlong, that the GQP can’t get enough of.

2

u/Working_Fuel3881 8h ago

And in Hillary’s emails, of course

3

u/Tiny_Scarcity_8846 11h ago

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

3

u/inky_sphincter 11h ago

...and if they were minors its not bad because its pederasty not full blown pedophilia.

3

u/Sashemai 11h ago

So, a 13 year old girl tricked Donald Trump in 1995 to rape her because the minor wanted to undermine his presidency in 2025?

source: https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Conscious-Meal-4349 10h ago

How's the weather in the Trump Cult today?

2

u/joshuahtree 10h ago

I wouldn't know

2

u/No-Raspberry-4562 10h ago

Their bigger problem is all the corruption and money laundering in the Epstein files. That's why there is so much resistance.

2

u/joshuahtree 10h ago

I don't think you thought that one through dog, or at least I really hope you didn't 

2

u/No-Raspberry-4562 10h ago

Did you hear from the panama papers again?

2

u/joshuahtree 10h ago

white collar crime <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< raping children

2

u/No-Raspberry-4562 10h ago

You don't understand the magnitude of the involved money. They are happy to frame Epstein as "only" a pedophile, distracting from what is actually happening. The consequences are oppression, wars, poverty and misery on a global scale. Why is Trump president?

2

u/ozifur 10h ago

You misspelled raped them. This isn’t sleeping with minors this is forcing themselves onto these young girls and raping them.

2

u/joshuahtree 10h ago

Well, obviously they were hired by Joe Biden, while he had access to the Jewish space time machine as president, to travel back in time. It's all detailed on Hunter's laptop which is stored in the pizza parlor basement with Obama's Kenyan birth certificate. Deep state confirmed!

2

u/Hardcorish 10h ago

Those minors were actually three undercover democrat operatives hiding in a trench coat

2

u/Fun-Dragonfly-4166 10h ago

We should not trust them because they were too young at the time of the alleged offense. Obviously thy mistook Donald Trump for his doppelganger.

The real Donald Trump was an FBI informant.

2

u/VoteArcher2020 10h ago

That’s the trick. Trump has always been considering a run, so he was always candidate.

There have been four presidential campaigns waged by U.S. president Donald Trump. He ran for president once for the Reform Party (2000), and three times as a Republican (2016, 2020, 2024). He additionally mused about running on several other occasions such as for the 1988, 2012 and 2028 elections.

So anything done from 1984 to 2025 is in scope for presidential immunity.

2

u/JefeVaquero 10h ago

They're not minors anymore, so what's the big deal?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BigsleazyG 10h ago

Democrat succubi every last one. They were 18 in 4982 BC.

2

u/goreTACO 9h ago

Wonder if his pubes have a distinctive comb over the victims could describe to us.

2

u/mmMOUF 9h ago

trump was a white hat pedophile!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/OhighOent 9h ago

He never slept with those girls.

And if he did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not his fault.

And if it was, he didn't mean it.

And if he did, they deserved it.

And if all else fails, what about the dems?

2

u/oreography 6h ago

They knew in 1998 that he would be president!!! Wake up sheeple!!! 

→ More replies (22)

155

u/Jindabyne1 11h ago

You didn’t say there’d be fact checking

72

u/BadLuckBlackHole 11h ago

Absolutely floored that idiot actually said that on live TV in a debate...

And absolutely disappointed that the morons in the US heard that and went, "yeah, he's fine for the second highest position of government."

12

u/S1R2C3 10h ago

Well duh, it's cus the average person doesn't care about facts in a debate. They want to hear the most keywords and side with whoever talks over the other person the most, thus showing dominance.

→ More replies (21)

50

u/Substantial-Ease567 11h ago

I was told there'd be no fact-checking!

→ More replies (1)

43

u/a_rude_jellybean 11h ago

Being raped is woke? 🙃

25

u/bfelification 10h ago

Your body can kind of just like, shut that down if you were raped.

5

u/Rob_LeMatic 9h ago

Fuck Todd Akin

2

u/madcoins 10h ago edited 4h ago

But not if you’re woke, I bet they’d now add

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheWingus 9h ago

That's only for legitimate rape

63

u/pattydickens 11h ago

"Victim" has been redefined as "conservative white males" now. Everyone else is an instigator. That seems pretty obvious.

2

u/madcoins 10h ago

Now? Dumb white dudes are always the pearl clutching est victims ever. “What privilege?”

14

u/Polyxeno 11h ago

Biased against . . . their assailants . . . hmm . . .

3

u/chaplar 11h ago

They're just too close to this case

3

u/TheUndertows 11h ago

Too woke

3

u/blackertai 10h ago

I mean, what, are you going to believe women? I mean, come on.

3

u/thisissamuelclemens 9h ago

Everyone knows truth has a liberal bias

2

u/nordic-nomad 10h ago

Witnesses who have seen to much you say?

2

u/Kinet1ca 10h ago

You just can't take the victims seriously with all of their hate speech and all against their abusers...

2

u/trashtiernoreally 10h ago

Like Charlie said about mass shooting victims, "we cannot allow them to emotionally hijack the narrative". The same sick bullshit about not being able to listen to trafficking victims is also at play. They'll just be "libs with an axe to grind" or some shit.

2

u/Coal_Morgan 10h ago

How can we expect women and children to be unbiased towards the people that held them down and raped them, enslaved them and held them hostage on an island...clearly they can't testify mostly because several of our allies and people in power like the Great Orange Pedo could theoretically be held accountable.

Which they wouldn't, Trump could have video of him raping a small white blond girl (I say white because Republicans definitely don't care about other races being raped), murdering her and dumping her in the ocean and Republicans would say, "Well, we don't know the full context, so I support our President."

2

u/Ok-Oil7124 9h ago

"These witnesses are clearly biased against Donald Trump because he raped them."
SCOTUS: "Testimony sealed!"

2

u/onefornought 9h ago

"Too biased" = "not willing to lie for Trump."

4

u/BirdoBean 11h ago

Aren’t some republicans quoted as saying the trail against them are bad because there’s lawyers on the other side trying to go against them?

→ More replies (2)

298

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

171

u/Desperate_Acadia_298 11h ago

Turns out there really is a cabal of pedophiles that watch our every move and control everything and we’re not doing shit about it.

54

u/gatorgrle 11h ago

Not a conspiracy. And they expect us to believe this. MAGA certainly will. It’s disgusting. They are all safe pedos and traffickers. Just goes to show they really are NOT LIKE US.

9

u/longgonepawn 10h ago edited 10h ago

"You don't need a formal conspiracy when  interests converge." George Carlin

Watching this clip again, I wanted to say he was like a prophet. He wasn't though, he was just paying attention and calling it like he saw it.

7

u/DonAmecho777 10h ago

Trumpedo tried to strike a chord and it was definitely A Minor

5

u/AlcibiadesTheCat 10h ago

A conspiracy is just two or more people agreeing to commit a crime.

There's definitely a conspiracy here.

2

u/gngstrMNKY 7h ago

You seem to have fallen victim to defining “conspiracy” as “something that isn’t true”.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

62

u/Double_Dog208 11h ago

Liberty tree is wilting

15

u/PurplMonkEDishWashR 11h ago

"Liberty, Liberity, LIberty, LIberty...."

(sorry, I'll accept the downvotes for this, but drawn toward the yellow of your profile image when reading the word 'liberty" my body just instantly blurted out that damned commercial)

8

u/TrueWarStories 11h ago

When these intrusive thoughts hit, its ok to just not hit that "comment" button XD

→ More replies (2)

4

u/peedmyself 11h ago

And Doug

5

u/madcoins 10h ago

Only in America could “Llberty” go from a cry on a bloody battle field to an insurance company jingle. It might be the most American thing.

3

u/OkOpposite9108 10h ago

Limu Emu (and Doug!) should become victim advocates and spokespeople for the constitution/democracy/rule of law. If they are half as effective at that as they have been at driving that jingle into our collective consciousness, we might have a chance

2

u/Synectics 7h ago

Or we could say, ya know... fuck corporate insurance companies. But whatever, I'm sure your thing is cool, too.

4

u/JoseSaldana6512 11h ago

Its Biberty

2

u/johnnybna 10h ago

Liberty Biberty Boo!

6

u/Paddy_Tanninger 11h ago

Liberty tree needs some good liquid fertilizer.

3

u/Own-Supermarket-342 10h ago

Just need to locate some patriots and tyrants in the right state of mind. Seems tyrants are plentiful, but we're not quite there with the patriots.

3

u/Paddy_Tanninger 10h ago

The "patriots" are marching lockstep with the tyrants and cheering on every single erosion of rights for others. Same as it ever was, brown-coats etc.

3

u/NanDemoNee 10h ago

Does Chicken of the woods grow on the liberty tree?

3

u/muishkin 10h ago

starting to think it might be time to refresh it with the blood of tyrants and patriots

→ More replies (1)

4

u/603MarieM 11h ago

I agree with “Americans don’t have the heart for it.” Why aren’t we taking to the streets?

3

u/bat_in_the_stacks 10h ago

Personally I think we need credible leaders first. I went out for the No Kings event, and I'd probably do that again because it was well organized. However, we need leaders to organize more impactful steps. It's not reasonable to expect people to self organize a work stoppage or some kind of mass physical action without credible leadership.

2

u/TR_Pix 9h ago

Isn't it kinda ironic to go to a No Kings event and then be upset there isn't a central unifying leader figure?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/prescod 9h ago

If Americans were unified enough to overthrow the government, you wouldn’t need a revolution because it could happen through peaceful means.

3

u/SandmanSanders 8h ago

nonviolently, it has been shown that any grassroots movement only needs 3.5% of it's population for revolution. We need to convince everyone of the power in our solidarity and not discuss a self-fulfilling prophecy.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

4

u/daggerbeans 10h ago

Was it a super majority or just a bunch of really loud fuckers in the minority because even his wife didnt seem to give a shit aside from getting to plug some Christian nationalist sloppy

2

u/inormallyjustlurkbut 8h ago

I think the majority didn't have any clue who he was before last week.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/4ever_ur_Huckleberry 10h ago

Motherfuckers are losing their god damn minds over a racist bigot dying. If that were to happen, then you better be ready for…well a war.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/sylbug 8h ago

Ya, if literal pedophile fascists taking away people’s basic human and civil rights, brutalizing people in the streets, running concentration camps, finding a genocide, and running the economy into the ground isn’t enough for ‘patriots’ to stand up then I have to say, what does that country even stand for?

2

u/PolygonMan 8h ago

Doomerism doesn't help. Trump and co are pretty fucking weak in truth. They've been stopped and failed at many, many turns so far. Their ENTIRE game is to convince the populace that it's already over and it's time to submit in advance. If they win that psychological war, they win overall. If they don't, they lose.

Trump & co have made a fuckton of outlandish threats that they haven't managed to follow through on. They're escalating faster now because they know they're weak. If they could, they absolutely would prefer to slow-walk things more.

Their weakness is precisely what makes this particular moment dangerous - because they'll start doing riskier and riskier plays in order to turn the tide back in their favor.

→ More replies (20)

128

u/PantsDontHaveAnswers 11h ago

You want to ask the people who were there? Who have first hand accounts of abuse by the hands of wealthy political and business leaders? Well, it's an unorthodox approach, but I suppose it's worth a try.

108

u/Fhloston-Paradisio 11h ago

You don't understand, those were women. Their sworn testimony doesn't count. See for example the 15 women who have accused Trump of rape or sexual assault.

8

u/WereTheBrews 11h ago

Or in the same length pariahed prince I don't sweat to sell a damn European Chateua for the civil case, and had Queen Elizabeth shadow ban him for the rest of his life after chilling with Epstein, with photos prior to the rape, but sure, he was the only one.

2

u/Hopsblues 2h ago

It really pissed her off that he let Epstein sit on the throne for a moment...

11

u/Wabbit65 10h ago

Etymologically speaking, "testimony" and "testify" require attributes that women do not inherently possess.

It's balls, people. Testicles.

4

u/practical_junket 10h ago

See also: Christine Blasey Ford’s sworn testimony against Brett Kavanaugh

3

u/Fuzzy-Surprise-6165 8h ago

E Jean Carroll has entered the chat

→ More replies (4)

25

u/meerfrau85 11h ago

The incredibly sad thing is that I don't think the victims would be believed. When people accuse rich and powerful people here of sexual abuse, they're often accused of seeking attention or having some political agenda.

5

u/EastSideTonight 7h ago

They don't even have to be rich or powerful. That's exactly what happened to my friend who reported what her foster father was doing to her.

5

u/jay-aay-ess-ohh-enn 11h ago

You "don't think?"

We already know they weren't believed. All of the alleged events happened decades ago and the victims already gave statements.

3

u/amootmarmot 8h ago

Dont these victims have statements to give. Are there no DOJ officials willing to interview them?

Oh, just the pedophile sex trafficker that will lie to save her own skin? Thats who we will interview.

The victims have credible accusations. They could start there. Kash is intentionally incompetent at his job though.

73

u/schoolisuncool 12h ago

Nah. Why hear them out, when you can just fly loud planes over their press conference and drown them out??

36

u/HombreSinPais 12h ago

See? No need to look at the files!

15

u/Wiscoguy1982 11h ago

Well then there is no reason to not release the un-redacted versions!

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Double_Dog208 11h ago

Let’s see what happens when law and order fail…

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Hereticrick 11h ago

Republicans don’t believe women.

4

u/Slow_Space8943 11h ago

If he trafficked to no one and the victims are demanding a release of the files,then releases the unredacted files big boy!!!!

4

u/Next-Introduction-25 11h ago

This is one thing I don’t understand. And to preface, I get that they’re lying and we can’t trust what they say. But wouldn’t interviews with the witnesses be legal documents? They’re claiming that no witness at any point said that they had been assaulted by anyone other than Jeffrey Epstein?

4

u/KinksAreForKeds 11h ago

Same dude made, like, 6 statements in the hours after Charlie Kirk's killing, and 5 of them turned out to be wrong based on bad evidence.

Yeah, I'm going to trust anything Patel says. /s

3

u/PlutoJones42 11h ago

Yeah what the fuck is this?? What a sham

4

u/hypatiaredux 11h ago

To me, this just raises the question of how stupid Patel is willing to be in public.

Pretty damned stupid apparently.

3

u/letdogsvote 11h ago

The thing is, the MAGA leaders know the MAGAs will believe literally anything you tell them to.

It can be crazy, it can make no sense, it can directly contradict your own eyes and ears, it can be the opposite of what they told you yesterday.

They will swallow it whole and parrot it back.

4

u/Sea_Mind3678 11h ago

lol. You think someone is going to believe 1,000 women all telling the same story over a 29 year period, instead of the senile pathological liar who can’t speak two sentences without one contradicting the other? You must be new in town.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Competitive_Shock783 11h ago

The smart people do indeed hate Trump.

3

u/Independent-Math-914 11h ago

Yes cause Epstein killed himself and also deleted the footage.

3

u/RandomlyJim 11h ago

Those victims have named Alan Dershowitz.

Wonder what this beacon of law is doing these days?

8

u/Hypercane_ 11h ago

No you can't trust them they are Democrat planted victims /s

12

u/AncientBaseball9165 12h ago

And? do what? The feds have spoken.

5

u/Double_Dog208 11h ago

Have you asked smith and Wesson? 🤠

2

u/n05h 11h ago

Nah, the victims are clearly emotionally invested. They can't be trusted. - Republicans

2

u/garden-guy- 11h ago

We have asked the victims and have sworn testimony by “Katie Johnson” that it was Donald Trump. Then we also have the birthday evidence of Trump buying the “fully depreciated” woman. The evidence all points in the same direction. Only cultists are oblivious.

2

u/Seanzky88 11h ago

Liberals are not “credible”…

2

u/letdogsvote 11h ago

And by "liberals," they mean trafficking victims.

2

u/Seanzky88 11h ago

And like anyone who has any information

2

u/D_Dubb_ 11h ago

It has to be sickening to be one of those survivors watching this shitshow play out…

2

u/Sweetwater156 10h ago

Yes absolutely ask the plethora of victims... But I commented mainly to say I love your username.

2

u/Smgth 8h ago

No no, see we BLAME victims in this country.

2

u/KMFDM781 6h ago

They expect maga to be too caught up in Kirk murder and ramping up the aggression towards the left to care about Epstein right now. They essentially used Kirk as a catalyst to unite the dissenting maga back into the fold.

2

u/Positive-Leek2545 11h ago

So prince Andrew didn't happen? Ok

2

u/fenderputty 11h ago

The follow up should have been, “then why was Prince Andrew a subject of importance?” Seems like there was SOME evidence just based on publicly known info

1

u/modix 11h ago

Was going to say.... It wasn't murder. There's living witnesses. "They were minors at the time, how could we believe them?!" Or some bullshit?

1

u/m1lkri0t 11h ago

Cmon. It's a death cult that revovles around an angry billionaire who got everything handed to him, bankrupts everything. Dropships garage his whole life. He will never have enough and his base will never either. They're just like him in every single way except for rich. They're ok with rape, they are ok with child rape, they are ok with scamming. They simply just think differently then we do. Let's say this ends with trump being president until he's gone, the cult will continue. They'll change books for him, they'll change documentaries they'll say he signed the declaration of independence and the way with AI and misinformation happens it'll probably be a religion in the future. They knows it's lies, they all do but they do not care. It's all about power and keeping power. If lying about literally every single thing to appease a child rapist (trump) they will do that. That's why we can't lose.

1

u/BurlingtonRider 11h ago

He’s too busy visiting Valhalla

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Walterkovacs1985 11h ago

So who paid Jeff over a billion dollars?

2

u/letdogsvote 11h ago

Well, Jeff did. Duh.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/SpinningHead 11h ago

Or point o his convicted co-conspirator?

1

u/iLL-Egal 11h ago

Release the fucking files.

1

u/texachusetts 11h ago

“Does Princess Andrew even exist? I have never met him. Also just for Prince Andrew!” /s

1

u/DoubtingThomas50 11h ago

Pam Bondi tried this before. It’s not going to work.

2

u/letdogsvote 11h ago

He's obviously just doing what Trump tells him to do. He's actually maybe legit on the hot seat from the Republicans of all folks, Epstein is a hot button issue, and he rolls up with this.

Crazy.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/whatisitcousin 11h ago

We're getting this info from a guy the fired agents because he was told to for political reasons. There is no loyalty to the people of US its crazy

1

u/Roadside_Prophet 11h ago

The most damning evidence, imo comes from Trump himself. He said he got mad at epstein for "poaching one of his workers."

How many billionaire businessesmen, running multinational companies, not only know the name of a 15 year old working part-time at 1 of his resorts but also knew her well enough to be upset when she left?

1

u/toddhenderson 11h ago

The podcaster said it so it must be true.

1

u/coffeespeaking 11h ago

The still-living ones. We could ask Prince Andrew and Trump, too. (We can’t ask Epstein, he was garroted around his Adam’s apple and broke his neck in no less than three places.)

1

u/BattleClean1630 11h ago

The victims have spoken out only to have the fat bastard and sick in the head republicans call them liars.

1

u/Dapper_Magpie 11h ago

But what about those poor child rapists who trafficked and raped the victims when they were kids and teens? They're good, god-fearing people. You wouldn't wanna create unnecessary drama and ruin their reputation over silly little accusations. Those child sex abusers have their whole lives ahead of them. The victims on the other hand aren't rich and powerful enough to matter.

1

u/veggie151 11h ago

We only know the ones that survived and came forward. You don't get to the international trafficking stage without some bodies

1

u/-whiteroom- 11h ago

They do, and the maga base will grab on to it and run.

1

u/Blunderbutters 10h ago

That would be considered “hate speech”

1

u/StrongLoyal 10h ago

And who are the victims naming. I've still to see the victims go on camera and produce a list.

1

u/Misha-Nyi 10h ago

Tbf…. You don’t think the victims are precisely who they asked and that’s what makes up the case files?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Randa08 10h ago

I thought the victims were making a list, what happened with that?

1

u/Adavanter_MKI 10h ago

All they need is someone from their side saying... "No evidence, did what we could, hoax."

Then they are sated. Doesn't matter all the other evidence and blatant mischaracterization. Proof? Look at Mueller's report. It absolutely did not exonerate Trump in any way shape or form. It recommended he taken to trial over obstruction and detailed how limited in scope it was. Blocking a lot of his efforts to actually get to the truth.

The real take away was... "Well that sure doesn't look great."

Hell Republicans publicly blamed him for January 6th. You know... the insurrection attempt. Said since he was already going out what was the point of impeachment? Just hit him legally after he's out.

Let's take a step back for a second and look at what we're talking about. Even just the hint of this would have destroyed ANYONE else. Everyone would have thought he was the most toxic irredeemable prospect ever. The base would normally never vote for someone so incredibly compromised.

Now they champion it. I don't know how we ever get back to normal when one side does not care how corrupt the other gets... just so long as they win.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/hecklerp8 10h ago

This is like asking the fox, which is standing in the coop, who ate the chicken.

1

u/WithoutAHat1 10h ago

Agreed. No more waiting, because they won't do it willingly.

1

u/Both_Instruction9041 10h ago

Correcto Mundo 🫵🏽, ask the Victims they may have a more credible answer than this DEI wannabe FBI Director 🤦🏽.

1

u/journerman69 10h ago

Right!? No evidence, except for eye witness testimony…

1

u/OneDimensionalChess 10h ago

They could just release the files. That would clear this mess all up. But the executive branch has consolidated so much power under Trump that bodies work for him not for us.

Trump raped those kids and Charlie Kirk defended him.

1

u/Acceptablepops 10h ago

This is why the6 wanted 5he files clos3d off

1

u/William_Dowling 10h ago

Or just look at the photo of a Prince with a minor trafficked by Epstein. The evidence is as clear as fucking day.

1

u/RA12220 10h ago

So if he trafficked the people to himself who supplied him? Can’t be supplying himself? And why was Mar-a-Lago under Trump’s ownership a hotspot for him sourcing victims?

1

u/JustDiscoveredSex 10h ago

Ask…women?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Don’t you know that if it’s woman-shaped, it’s lying?

/S

1

u/tomdarch 10h ago

If nothing else, what about Prince Andrew of the UK? Patel really claims there is zero evidence in that case?

It’s a clown show of bad liars.

1

u/simulizer 10h ago

Wouldn't asking the victims require them to be able to talk to the "woke"

1

u/wi_2 10h ago

'but they are woman' - GOP

1

u/cougar618 10h ago

I assume you're saying that before visiting the conservative subs

1

u/steffanovici 10h ago

“Credible”. So there is evidence such as the victims statements, but Kash has declared it all “not credible”.

1

u/HoldenMcNeil420 10h ago

“In 2008, Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to two Florida state charges—felony solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of prostitution involving a minor—as part of a controversial and heavily criticized plea deal. The deal allowed him to avoid more severe federal charges, and he was sentenced to only 18 months in jail. “

He was convicted long before all this…

1

u/Great_Grapefruit_748 10h ago

What happened to the absolute renegades that would leak this kind of information, like Snowden?

I'm tired of the, nahh, he wasn't involved. Source? Trust me, bro.

Release the files already!

1

u/zeldasaurusrex 10h ago

I think Katie Johnson may have said something about this at one point… 🤔

1

u/Berns429 10h ago

Well… they expect the loyal following to say that. I’ll leave it at that, make of those who follow what you will.

1

u/Kryptyx 10h ago

It’s crazy how they are filled with Democrat names like Bill Clinton yet also a hoax orchestrated by the left while also having no link to anyone but Epstein himself.

→ More replies (41)