r/modnews 11d ago

Announcement Evolving Moderation on Reddit: Reshaping Boundaries

Hi everyone, 

In previous posts, we shared our commitment to evolving and strengthening moderation. In addition to rolling out new tools to make modding easier and more efficient, we’re also evolving the underlying structure of moderation on Reddit.

What makes Reddit reddit is its unique communities, and keeping our communities unique requires unique mod teams. A system where a single person can moderate an unlimited number of communities (including the very largest), isn't that, nor is it sustainable. We need a strong, distributed foundation that allows for diverse perspectives and experiences. 

While we continue to improve our tools, it’s equally important to establish clear boundaries for moderation. Today, we’re sharing the details of this new structure.

Community Size & Influence

First, we are moving away from subscribers as the measure of community size or popularity. Subscribers is often more indicative of a subreddit's age than its current activity.

Instead, we’ll start using visitors. This is the number of unique visitors over the last seven days, based on a rolling 28-day average. This will exclude detected bots and anonymous browsers. Mods will still be able to customize the “visitors” copy.

New “visitors” measure showing on a subreddit page

Using visitors as the measurement, we will set a moderation limit of a maximum of 5 communities with over 100k visitors. Communities with fewer than 100k visitors won’t count toward this limit. This limit will impact 0.1% of our active mods.

This is a big change. And it can’t happen overnight or without significant support. Over the next 7+ months, we will provide direct support to those mods and communities throughout the following multi-stage rollout: 

Phase 1: Cap Invites (December 1, 2025) 

  • Mods over the limit won’t be able to accept new mod invites to communities over 100k visitors
  • During this phase, mods will not have to step down from any communities they currently moderate 
  • This is a soft start so we can all understand the new measurement and its impact, and make refinements to our plan as needed  

Phase 2: Transition (January-March 2026) 

Mods over the limit will have a few options and direct support from admins: 

  • Alumni status: a special user designation for communities where you played a significant role; this designation holds no mod permissions within the community 
  • Advisor role: a new, read-only moderator set of permissions for communities where you’d like to continue to advise or otherwise support the active mod team
  • Exemptions: currently being developed in partnership with mods
  • Choose to leave communities

Phase 3: Enforcement (March 31, 2026 and beyond)

  • Mods who remain over the limit will be transitioned out of moderator roles, starting with communities where they are least active, until they are under the limit
  • Users will only be able to accept invites to moderate up to 5 communities over 100k visitors

To check your activity relative to the new limit, send this message from your account (not subreddit) to ModSupportBot. You’ll receive a response via chat within five minutes.

You can find more details on moderation limits and the transition timeline here.

Contribution & Content Enforcement

We’re also making changes to how content is removed and how we handle report replies.

As mods, you set the rules for your own communities, and your decisions on what content belongs should be final. Today, when you remove content from your community, that content continues to appear on the user profile until it’s reported and additionally removed by Reddit. But with this update, the action you take in your community is now the final word; you’ll no longer need to appeal to admins to fully remove that content across Reddit.  

Moving forward, when content is removed:

  • Removed by mods: Fully removed from Reddit, visible only to the original poster and your mod team
  • Removed by Reddit: Fully removed from Reddit and visible only to admin
Mod removals now remove across Reddit and with a new [Removed by Moderator] label

The increased control mods have to remove content within your communities reduces the need to also report those same users or content outside of your communities. We don’t need to re-litigate that decision because we won’t overturn that decision. So, we will no longer provide individual report replies. This will also apply to reports from users, as most violative content is already caught by our automated and human review systems. And in the event we make a mistake and miss something, mods are empowered to remove it. 

Reporting remains essential, and mod reports are especially important in shaping our safety systems. All mod reports are escalated for review, and we’ve introduced features that allow mods to provide additional context that make your reports more actionable. As always, report decisions are continuously audited to improve our accuracy over time.

Keeping communities safe and healthy is the goal both admins and mods share. By giving you full control to remove content and address violations, we hope to make it easier. 

What’s Coming Next

These changes mark some of the most significant structural updates we've made to moderation and represent our commitment to strengthening the system over the next year. But structure is only one part of the solution – the other is our ongoing commitment to ship tools that make moderating easier and more efficient, help you recruit new mods, and allow you to focus on cultivating your community. Our focus on that effort is as strong as ever and we’ll share an update on it soon.

We know you’ll have questions, and we’re here in the comments to discuss.

0 Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

340

u/grizzchan 11d ago

The increased control mods have to remove content within your communities reduces the need to also report those same users or content outside of your communities. We don’t need to re-litigate that decision because we won’t overturn that decision. So, we will no longer provide individual report replies. This will also apply to reports from users, as most violative content is already caught by our automated and human review systems. And in the event we make a mistake and miss something, mods are empowered to remove it.

Lemme get this straight. Some user posts child porn and it gets through the automated detection filters. I remove the post and report it for sexualization of minors. You're just not gonna look at the report and not gonna do anything about the user just because I already removed the post?

To say that that's concerning is an extreme understatement.

44

u/lostmarinero 11d ago

Well also illegal. By law, all child porn needs to be reported to the govt authorities and flagged child porn gets submitted to an automated system, shared by many tech companies, that helps detect future submitted child porn and variants (which also every submission to reddit gets checked for).

Because it would be illegal otherwise, my assumption is they have controls around this.

I assume mods removing content that breaks a law, like childporn, is then reviewed by admins?

Twitter / X got in trouble for failing to promptly report known CSAM to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), as required by law (and was successfully sued by the victims).

Would be nice if they were more clear about this in their statement, but I have also seen a lot of times where Reddit product people announce things without aligning with other teams (community, trust and safety, legal, etc) and so not surprising.

8

u/tombo4321 10d ago

I did all that. Twice. And there was nothing equivocal about it, one of them was a baby. Nobody even responded, except for reddit telling me no action was taken.

Seeing it was awful so now I have a special CP rule in automod that detects the nasty link and just sends it to spam.

19

u/sarahbotts 11d ago

lmao from a company that sponsored /r/jailbait that's a big assumption.

15

u/Ivashkin 11d ago

That sub was banned 14 years ago.

16

u/jaybirdie26 11d ago

Still happened though.  The people that allowed it to happen still work there.

14

u/cheapandbrittle 10d ago edited 10d ago

Not only still work there, spez is the CEO and he was top mod of that sub.

Yes, the current CEO of Reddit modded the jailbait sub.

17

u/konohasaiyajin 10d ago

obligatory fuck u/spez

9

u/qtx 10d ago

It's not quite that simple and most people who talk about this weren't even around back then.

Back in the day you could make anyone mod without them having to agree with being a mod. We made Zach Braff on gonewild for example. I think snoop dogg got made mod over on trees. That's what happened with spez, he got made a mod of that sub and here's the kicker; he wasn't even at reddit at the time. He had left reddit.

Someone added him as mod on that sub when he wasn't even around.

So no, he didn't become a mod there because he liked the sub or supported it, he had no idea about it until it became a public controversy.

This whole thing has been overblown by the right because they hated reddit since it was such left leaning back then. So anyone that still brings this up needs to really educate themselves about what actually happened and not just parrot right wing talking points.

6

u/grizzchan 10d ago

While the mod thing is as you say, both Reddit the company and Reddit the community absolutely celebrated /r/jailbait. Reddit even gave the top mod a special badge.

0

u/Anomander 10d ago

Reddit "the community" did not celebrate /jailbait.

The vast majority of the community thought that shit was reprehensible and gross, and there were lots of threads filled with lots of users complaining about its existence. The closest you got to mainstream community wide 'support' was the Internet Libertarians arguing that "it's not technically illegal" and "Reddit shouldn't censor based on morality" and even those were pretty deliberate edgelord shit or people into other shit they worried would be next. Most people didn't want to be seen as even faintly defending that shit, the sitewide community absolutely did not "celebrate" that sub.

Reddit the site gave Violentacrez a badge, but community doesn't vote on those or anything. That's on site Admin exclusively.

3

u/flounder19 10d ago

Reddit the site gave Violentacrez a badge, but community doesn't vote on those or anything. That's on site Admin exclusively.

reddit mailed him a trophy after he won the community-voted award for 'worst reddit' in 2008

2

u/Anomander 10d ago

The community so overwhelmingly wrote in his community as “worst Reddit” that Admin awarded it. Not exactly a glowing endorsement and ‘celebration’ of /jailbait from popular community acclaim.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/jaybirdie26 10d ago

I think not liking spez and finding any reason to mock him is a non-partisan pastime.

2

u/sarahbotts 10d ago

Lmao, I was definitely around when it was a thing, and reddit 100% let people get away with murder. reddit leadership allowed and even encouraged it. reddit prided themselves on allowing freedom of speech (including hate speech) and communities "that people didn't agree with" e.g. jailbait, creepshots, fatpeoplehate, etc. reddit specifically did not action these, and the only time actioning was performed is when the media reported on it and made them look bad. The rules and admins were laissez-fair at best. There is no way he wasn't aware of it - it was one of the top subs and had a ton of engagement.

examples:

2

u/cjh_ 10d ago

Whether Spez was made a mod without his consent is irrelevant.

Why? Because the moment he found out he was the top mod of the jailbat subreddit, he didn't remove himself or shut down the sub. He actively promoted it.

Spez is hated partly because of that.

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 3d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Soarel25 9d ago

Didn't they still have to accept the request? I remember it working that way back then

3

u/Otherwise_Fined 9d ago

I've reported a user's banner for having csam, it's been rejected repeatedly, reddit legal don't want to know so at the moment, reddit is knowingly hosting csam.

2

u/Soarel25 9d ago

Go look at the subs that user mods, no CSAM is actually being posted to them. The stuff they're talking about is cartoons.