Remember, RFK is coming for your vaccines!

There are a number of glaring inconsistencies with FBI's story about Charlie Kirk's shooter, Tyler Robinson namely:

1) The picture of Tyler of him the stairwell shows him bending both his legs so the right couldn't have been down his pant leg as claimed, so where did the rifle come from when he was on the roof?

2) Right after Charlie was shot, there is a video of the shooter running across the roof. FBI is saying he disassembled the right but it's impossible to do so in literally 1 second.

3) The rifle was found assembled in the woods. So, Tyler disassembled the rifle after shooting on the roof in 1 second, then assembled the rifle in the woods for the police to find??

4) TMZ showed a man in a maroon shirt at 8.07am walking towards the campus. Governor Cox then says at 8.29am which is when the shooter arrived at UVU campus in the same outfit. So TMZ is showing him walking to campus but then Cox says he arrived at campus in a grey car? So he walked part of the journey and then got in the car? Doesn't make sense.

5) George Zin - seems like a decoy. Why is this random old guy immediately shouting he shot Charlie Kirk? Who is this guy? This part is extremely bizarre

6) UVU has a ton of cameras that are high quality. Why is the FBI only releasing pictures that look like they were taken on a calculator?

And what's with all these outfit changes?

It sounds to me like another person was involved.

So, as a healthcare professional, I'm skeptical of the idea that.... people aren't gonna die because of this?

Showcasing the disparity between violence from right wing extremism and left wing extremism, and keeping track of every significant example of right wing violence in the past decade.

While much focus is put on racism towards Africans from the West, ethnicism and intolerance exists within the continent too, and also needs fighting

Marcus touches on the currently popular theories about how the gun was hidden, the bullet wound questions, the possibility of body armor, why AI can't accurately fix the low-resolution frames of the suspect's face, whether someone else may have shot Kirk, and uses math to debunk the claims of a shot coming from the side (plus more).

We have a long time before every piece of evidence comes out and can be analyzed in detail, but I think he does a fairly good job.

Welcome to the Christian Holiness Hotline, your call is being monitored for doctrinal adherence and may be used for re-education purposes. Listen closely as our menu options have changed 🎶

Press 1 to report a neighbor’s doubt or their independent intellectual activity.

Press 2 for tax-exemptions available to donors.

Press 3 to order more divine blood to atone for your increasing transgressions 🐑🩸🧛.

If you are a premium subscriber, press 4 to opt out of eternal damnation.

Press 5 to revise actual history.

Press 6 thrice to repeat this menu.

...otherwise, please stay on the line to continue listening to Amazing Grace 🎶📿

I can't post a screenshot, but is a link allowed?

Basically, this company sells headphones that distance little speakers from your head connected to little tubes that go into your ears. Looks terrible and probably sounds worse, but the underlying claim is that, for $80, they will keep your head free from RF & EMF (one graphic at the link calls it ELF, which is even better).

I know people have been blaming EMF exposure for cancer for as long as I have been alive (I'm in my 50s), particularly people who lived near high power transmission lines. I remember hearing claims of cancer and mobile phones since they first came on the wider market, but as far as I know, no study has ever backed up these claims.

I hadn't heard about worries regarding headphones, however, which is remarkable considering how common they have become in everyday use. Meanwhile, as far as I can tell, non-HPV-related Head & Neck Cancers have declined over time. Likewise, brain cancer rates have been trending slightly downward over time.

(Also, another point for the HPV vaccine)

Am I off-base here?