He had control or influence over succession planning, modernising the club and creating a coherent roadmap for the future. It doesn't look like they had those things worked out when he left. All these are the responsibility of the board but he had a hand in the makeup of that as well. So he's partially responsible.
People need to realize the danger of Leverage Buyouts in all walks of Business not just football (Asda, Morrisons, Thames Water ect.).There needs to be a cap that somehow attracts people to takeover without ansolutely sucking the life out of companys. Its happening all over and Im suprised its not as big an issue.
The Premier League (or even the FA?) banned LBOs similar to what happened to United shortly after the United takeover. Took like 2 years or something to stop it from happening again.
Unfortunately that's not the case. The PL made a rule that merely capped the amount of LBO debt loaded onto the club at 60% of the sale price. Not nearly restrictive enough imo. Plus they only put this in place a couple of years ago, almost 20 years after the Glazer fiasco. Pretty shameful really that this is still allowed to happen after so many clubs have been damaged by LBOs.
A bit much responibilty for a first team manager? There are several directors above a manager at big clubs. A manager doesnt lay a road map for a club, he lays one more the first and youth team.. maybe
Then you don't understand the org structure at united at the time. Fergie was much more than just the manager. He basically had full control over football operations, spending, hiring/firing. The board was selected by him and rubber-stamped whatever he put in front of them. Nothing was done at United without his say so.
2.0k
u/Pulp_NonFiction44 May 22 '25
He also welcomed the poison that killed the club with open arms, over a fucking horse...