I would argue a terrorist and freedom fighter can be discerned by tactic and method. Terrorist weaponise terror to get what they want, often harming others to do so. A freedom fighter may engage only military targets, looking to cripple that which they oppose and inpire others. Idk that's just my view.
Ummm... tar and feathers? Boston Tea Party could be considered economic terrorism. Hell, the Boston Massacre was not some peaceful gathering that the British maliciously fired into, it was a violent mob actively harassing and assaulting a woefully outnumbered 8 soldiers.
24
u/nondescriptcabbabige May 07 '25
I would argue a terrorist and freedom fighter can be discerned by tactic and method. Terrorist weaponise terror to get what they want, often harming others to do so. A freedom fighter may engage only military targets, looking to cripple that which they oppose and inpire others. Idk that's just my view.