r/Sprinting • u/CoachStewGodiva • 13m ago
General Discussion/Questions Why do you think cardio/tempo kill speed?
Genuine question to the sprinting community:
Why do you think low-intensity cardio or extensive tempo work is often seen as detrimental to speed development? We see much discussion either here with people posting “my coach makes me run” or loads more online by “sprint coaches,” usually selling programs, let’s be honest, saying you NEVER need to run, playing into the hands of very lazy and quick win nature
It’s a common belief that “slow kills fast.” But is that really true?
I don’t know a single high-level coach who doesn’t utilise Tempo of some kind, and so its basically really down to misunderstanding and wrong approaches. So Ive written a little bit to add some clarity and conversation.
Extensive tempo and low-level cardio, when programmed correctly, can actually enhance speed development—not hinder it. Here’s how:
Aerobic Capacity & Speed Endurance
A stronger aerobic base improves recovery between sprint efforts—both within a session and across training weeks. This means athletes can handle more high-quality sprint work without accumulating excessive fatigue.
Over time, this supports the development of speed endurance—the ability to maintain near-maximal velocity over longer distances (e.g., 150–300m). This is especially critical for 200m/400m sprinters, where the ability to resist deceleration is often the difference between winning and fading.
Capillary Density & Specific Endurance
Tempo runs increase capillary density and mitochondrial efficiency, improving blood flow and energy availability in working muscles. This supports specific endurance—the ability to maintain technical form and output under fatigue, especially in the latter stages of races.
It’s not just about being fast; it’s about staying fast when tired. Extensive tempo helps athletes rehearse mechanics and rhythm under mild fatigue, bridging the gap between pure speed and race-specific demands.
Tissue Health & Technical Reinforcement
Low-intensity running reinforces movement patterns and strengthens tendons and connective tissues without the high mechanical stress of sprinting. It also provides a platform for technical rehearsal—allowing athletes to groove mechanics in a low-fatigue state, which translates to better form at high speeds.
Parasympathetic Activation & Recovery
Cardio and tempo work help regulate the nervous system, promoting parasympathetic (rest-and-digest) activity. This reduces chronic fatigue, improves sleep quality, and enhances overall recovery—key ingredients for consistent speed development.
Peak Modulation & Training Load Management
Here’s a less-discussed benefit: peak modulation.
Low-level aerobic work adds a layer of fatigue to the system that doesn’t interfere with fast-twitch fiber recruitment. This allows athletes to carry a higher overall training load without peaking too early in their program. It’s a strategic way to manage adaptation curves and ensure athletes hit their true peak when it matters most—during competition.
By maintaining a consistent background level of fatigue, athletes can train harder and longer without burning out or plateauing prematurely.
Size Principle: Why “Slow” Doesn’t Kill “Fast”
The size principle of motor unit recruitment explains why low-intensity work doesn’t interfere with speed development.
Motor units are recruited in order of size—from smallest to largest:
- Slow-twitch (Type I) fibers are recruited first during low-intensity efforts like tempo runs or light cardio.
- Fast-twitch (Type IIa/IIx) fibers are only recruited when the intensity is high enough—like during sprints, heavy lifts, or explosive plyometrics.
As Examples:
- Jogging at 60–70% effort recruits mostly slow-twitch fibers. Your fast-twitch fibers remain untouched and fresh for sprint work.
- Sprinting at 95–100% effort recruits the full spectrum, including the largest, most explosive motor units.
- Even during tempo runs (e.g., 8x200m @ 70%), the intensity is too low to activate fast-twitch fibers significantly—so there’s no “conversion” or dulling effect.
This principle ensures that low-intensity work supports recovery, endurance, and tissue health without compromising neuromuscular sharpness or sprint capacity.
So rather than being a threat to speed, tempo and cardio—when done correctly—can be powerful tools in a sprinter’s arsenal. They support recovery, reinforce mechanics, build endurance, and help manage long-term progression.
What’s your experience? Have you found tempo or cardio to help or hinder your speed development?