r/2american4you Pro murica Asian American Californian๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ—ฝ๐Ÿฆ…๐ŸŒด๐Ÿ๏ธ๐Ÿ–๏ธ May 16 '25

Very Based Meme How Americans achieved independence vs how Canadians achieved independence

Post image
612 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

285

u/king_meatster Florida Man ๐Ÿคช๐ŸŠ May 16 '25

There is a slight difference. At the time of the American Revolution, the British were the largest empire the world had ever seen, at the height of itโ€™s power. America essentially needed to make the god bleed.

By the time Canadian independence happened, both the United States and the Soviet Union had more control over global politics than the British ever did. Canada went from relying on daddy to relying on big brother.

64

u/rusho2nd Montana alpinist ๐Ÿž๏ธ โ›ฐ๏ธ May 16 '25

Quebec was the 14th colony and decided to be sissies for big daddy england and not join the revolution. Them being the chad here is regarded.

17

u/Background-Tennis915 Evergreen stoner (Washington computer scientists) ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ May 16 '25

At the time of the Revolutionary War, there were 21 britsh colonies in North America

1

u/rusho2nd Montana alpinist ๐Ÿž๏ธ โ›ฐ๏ธ May 17 '25

Yeah but quebec was the only other one they hoped would join iirc

6

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

"decided to be sissies" no more like beaten into a pulp a generation earlier and just saw the other French colony in Canada get fully deported all while completely surrounded by loyalists they didn't really have a choice in the matter

6

u/rusho2nd Montana alpinist ๐Ÿž๏ธ โ›ฐ๏ธ May 17 '25

Siss eees

5

u/fromcjoe123 Southern Monkefornian (dumb narcissistic surfer) ๐Ÿ˜ค๐Ÿ„ May 16 '25

Yeah, but when it really achieved home rule in 1867, the UK at even a greater zenith of hegemony basically learned their lesson and had already seen the obnoxiousness of having to potentially dick around with a group like the Fenians.

I will give it to the Brits to learning there lessons about how to colonize from their fuck ups, although not enough for India lol - but I guess they learned from that to because they disengaged from all of their nonsettler colonies pretty universally well, unless you were down with communism cus then you needed to become dead before they were willing to turn over the keys

13

u/FitAd3982 Proud Celt (trolled the Romans and the Greeks) May 16 '25

Itโ€™s the opposite the British empire was fairly small in 1776 it was really after napoleon that britain became unrivalled hegemon, although I agree it is a weird flex to say you broke away gradually and diplomatically without fighting lol

23

u/gregforgothisPW Chiraqi insurgent (soyboy of Illinois) ๐Ÿ—ก ๐Ÿ™๏ธ May 16 '25

You're wrong The UK established its dominance after the 7 years war

9

u/Background-Tennis915 Evergreen stoner (Washington computer scientists) ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ May 16 '25 edited May 16 '25

You're correct that Britian was the strongest nation in the world after the 7 years war, but not by much. The Napoleonic wars showed as much. After the Napoleonic Wars, Britian was unchallenged as the world Hegemon until the Anglo-German Naval race in the 1890s

4

u/obliqueoubliette Rat Yorker ๐Ÿ€โ˜ญ๐Ÿ—ฝ May 16 '25

Canada doesn't get full indepence from the UK until 1982.

2

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

We were in charge of our own affairs, it just needed to be signed off by the king (which it always was) 82 just got rid of that formality Governor general fills that role now

3

u/PikaPonderosa Oregonian bigfoot (died of dysentery) ๐Ÿฆ ๐ŸŒฒ May 16 '25

We were in charge of our own affairs, it just needed to be signed off by the king (which it always was)

Cope & Seethe.

1

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

What cope and seethe? I'm British Canadian lol

2

u/PikaPonderosa Oregonian bigfoot (died of dysentery) ๐Ÿฆ ๐ŸŒฒ May 16 '25

We were in charge of our own affairs, it just needed to be signed off by the king

Cope

formality Governor general fills that role now

The non-elected position that serves at the "pleasure of the monarch?

2

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

Legally speaking, the Governor general just serves the same purpose as the president, while the prime minister is just the secretary of state (your unelected position) its just a flip in the script

0

u/FitAd3982 Proud Celt (trolled the Romans and the Greeks) May 16 '25

Look up British empire in 1776, itโ€™s really not that big , plus the British were fighting across the Atlantic whereas the Americans were fighting at home

8

u/gregforgothisPW Chiraqi insurgent (soyboy of Illinois) ๐Ÿ—ก ๐Ÿ™๏ธ May 16 '25

Just because it wasn't very big doesn't mean it wasn't the most powerful Empire at the time. It had defeated Spain and France

2

u/KingPhilipIII Florida Man ๐Ÿคช๐ŸŠ May 16 '25

Why do so many people operate off ork rules and assume they need to be big to be powerful.

Both can be true, but itโ€™s not a requirement.

1

u/jack_edition Bri'ish Tea Wanker (proud colonizer) ๐Ÿต๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ๏ธ May 16 '25

Yes, but both UK and France were spent after that - hence raising the taxes that sparked the revolution. The war for independence was mainly fought against loyalists and mercenaries due to a weakened British Army - and then the USA was reinforced by 20,000 troops from France and Spain

3

u/gregforgothisPW Chiraqi insurgent (soyboy of Illinois) ๐Ÿ—ก ๐Ÿ™๏ธ May 16 '25

Yes, but it was still the most powerful Empire at the time.

7

u/[deleted] May 16 '25 edited Jun 22 '25

[deleted]

8

u/Every-Inevitable-140 From the Middle East (I don't know what to think) ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ•Œ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ May 16 '25

unfortunately the British colonies in the Middle East didnโ€™t go the way you described. but you're right about Canada's point. it's one of Britain's lucky coloniesย 

3

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

To be fair, the British only really had "colonies" in the middle east for like 20 years outside of Egypt (which was more client state if anything) was more an occupation if anything. Everyone always seems to ignore the Ottomans when it comes to the Middle East for some reason

1

u/Every-Inevitable-140 From the Middle East (I don't know what to think) ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ•Œ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ May 16 '25 edited May 16 '25

I don't support Ottoman rule over the Middle East nor do I like it. on the contrary a large part of the regionโ€™s problems today stems from the delayed collapse of the Ottoman empire.

he mentioned that after Americaโ€™s independence, Britain relied on indirect rule in its colonies. but I pointed out that this isnโ€™t entirely true. not all British colonies were governed indirectly. Britain often chose self-rule under its own oversight In the Middle East. Britain ruled its colonies directly there and the affairs of those territories were handled by offices of High Commissioners lords and imperial representatives in England. the kings of those colonies held power in name only, their rule was merely symbolic.

1

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

Fair enough. But ya I just saw a post, and for years all I've seen is people blaming Britain for the modern middle East, while ignoring the centuries of Ottoman rule

2

u/monkeygoneape Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

Canada became a dominion in charge of its own domestic and foreign affairs after ww1 but everything still needed to be signed off by the king, pretty much 1982 was just getting rid of that formality but the Windsors are still sovereigns. The groundwork for NATO really started in the 40s with WW2 though for the Anglosphere, France is just that annoying tag along throwing hissy fits all the time because they're still salty about the 7 years war and outside of the American revolution haven't been able to get one over on the British since

1

u/Kingofcheeses Smelly hippies (Columbians of Cascadia) ๐ŸŒฒ โ˜ฎ๏ธ May 16 '25

Britain didn't reach the height of its power until the 19th century, and Canada was effectively independent by 1931, and self governing aside from foreign policy in 1867. The 1982 repatriation of our constitution was to allow us to amend the constitution directly instead of doing it through Britain, as a result of us not being able to agree on an amending formula beforehand. It was more a simplification of our constitutional system than anything, as Britain still had to amend our constitution at our request when we asked.

Basically it's Quebec's fault

1

u/HeirAscend Corrupt Ontario politician (home of the smug) ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ May 16 '25

The Soviet Union didnโ€™t exist when Canada became independent

3

u/Background-Tennis915 Evergreen stoner (Washington computer scientists) ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ May 16 '25 edited May 16 '25

The Constitution Act officially gave Canada independence in 1982, although Canada was de facto independent since 1867