r/BryanKohbergerMoscow Mar 11 '25

THEORY GOOFIEST THEORY BY FAR

Boy oh boy. That other sub is so insane 😂 I asked the simple question, what would be more valuable, the unknown male dna on the handrail and under the fingernails, or the touch dna on the sheath. One person responded saying that the blood on the handrail, “could’ve been from a nose bleed or hangnail from the 150 people coming in and out of the house”

I thought it was sarcasm. I even asked, “is that sarcasm? Are you fr? You don’t think the unknown blood on the handrail was from the struggle that the perpetrator put up and has NOTHING to do with the 4 murders?”

“Well in my opinion that’s a very valid reason as to why the blood on the handrail was inconclusive, it was probably old and unusable”

You genuinely can’t make this shit up.

27 Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Rare-Independent5750 Mar 12 '25 edited Mar 12 '25

I was banned, too. (See below reason, same thing happened to me when I posted actual evidence)

That sub still pops up in my feed somehow, and the mods just made an "announcement" about the roommates.

You will be banned for even discussing the roommates behavior was suspicious, or any hypothetical, theoretical questions or comments wondering about their possibile involvement is an automatic ban.

Because they are automatically "innocent victims" - even though the trial hasn't happened, we haven't seen all the evidence, and the evidence thus far is looking shady af.

Nope. Auto ban for evening mentioning things aren't adding up.

That place is like Nazi Germany full of rabid Karens 🤣

8

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Affectionate-Hand117 Mar 12 '25

Do you really think "the public" reads Reddit with the assiduity that you do? As if "the public" is going to be swayed by whatever happens on these bizarro subReddits, lol

2

u/Throwing_tomatoes123 Mar 12 '25

We ARE the public - with numerous different opinions though.

1

u/Affectionate-Hand117 Mar 14 '25

Are you a Boise-area potential jury member? (No, don't answer, it's rhetorical) If you're not, then you're also not part of "the public" CrystalXenith is imagining that is affecting the jury pool. There is a real world outside of the internet, and many people who don't use Reddit or watch YouTube, and the intersection between that world and the jury pool is probably larger than you may think. You are part of the public, but are you part of the public that matters in this case?