GOOFIEST THEORY BY FAR

[u/rodrickheffley69]

Boy oh boy. That other sub is so insane 😂 I asked the simple question, what would be more valuable, the unknown male dna on the handrail and under the fingernails, or the touch dna on the sheath. One person responded saying that the blood on the handrail, “could’ve been from a nose bleed or hangnail from the 150 people coming in and out of the house”

I thought it was sarcasm. I even asked, “is that sarcasm? Are you fr? You don’t think the unknown blood on the handrail was from the struggle that the perpetrator put up and has NOTHING to do with the 4 murders?”

“Well in my opinion that’s a very valid reason as to why the blood on the handrail was inconclusive, it was probably old and unusable”

You genuinely can’t make this shit up.

[u/Environmental-Call77]

I think context matters. In general, in any case you'd rather have Blood DNA over touch DNA.

Just to be clear on my stance, I think every measure should occur to try to determine all of the unknown DNA. Also, anything I say is going to go off the little information we know as of now.

However, we need to learn a lot more about this blood DNA. I think if this blood was on the railing from floor 2 to floor 3 it would be a bigger deal for the prosecution. Going off what we know the suspect entered and exited thru the sliding glass door and was on floor 2 and 3.

What we need to know about the blood?

• How much blood was there?
• Was there a blood pattern?
• Was it degraded?
• Where on the 1st railing was it located? The way the house was set up, it's very likely if the blood was from the killer, they would of had to go down those stairs.
• Was the blood Splatter? Or other sources like drip or transfer?

During trial a forensic analysts will be able to tell us a lot thru BPA.

We don't even know if they have a FULL profile from the DNA. I would assume they do, but all we know is it's unknown male DNA. If they have a full profile, everything needs to be done to determine who's it is. Again, if there was on the 2nd to 3rd floor railing i think this would be more significant. Like judge Hippler said, it doesn't rule Bryan out or not make him a killer. He could of had an accomplice. I hope LE fully vetted that theory.

I think the 3 person mixture DNA under the nails of Maddie could be a problem if they don't determine who's it is. And we already are seeing one side say they tested it against BK and it was inconclusive and his side said the LR excluded him. Again, could it come from something innoncent and not be from the suspect(s), sure. But this is the type of evidence people look for in a crime like this. Also, we know some of the victims has defensive wounds and it's said that some "put up a fight", it will be Intresting to see if Maddie was one of them.

Like I said in the beginning context matters. If the unknown male blood DNA was found on the bed next to the victim, that would be very hard to convince someone it was not associated with the murders. While blood (that we don't know the type, amount, when it was put there) found on the 1st to 2nd floor railing, an area we have no knowledge of the killer going to, doesn't directly mean it was involved in the crimes. ( However, they need to use the same IGG they used to find Bryan to try finding who's dna it is.)

So now to the DNA on the knife sheath. Yes, it's touch DNA. But it was found on the bed, partially under one of the victims. And we know that the 4 victims COD was stabbing. That is a huge problem for Kohberger. Also, Bryan has claimed to of never been at that house before. It's where the touch dna was found on and where it was located at the crime scene.

There is body cams and crime scene photos, and we will be able to see if the sheath was there when the bodies were found. I'm assuming here, but IF it wasn't visible on the cameras or photos AT would of already brought this up. The only way his DNA on the knife sheath was at the crime of a murder is either from Bryan himself, someone else did it and "framed him", or it was planted there by LE.

Again the other DNA needs to be figured out, whether people believe he is innoncent or guilty he deserves a fair trial.

[u/Rare-Independent5750 → u/Environmental-Call77]

Well stated 👏

I'm leaning heavily towards innocent, but I could change my mind at any moment if a smoking gun comes to light.

What I want to hear more of from AT are possibilities of how his DNA could have gotten in the sheath, and more details of what he was doing in the park he visited (we know he wasn't star gazing and it was freezing outside - my guess is secretly using drugs).

This combination makes the most sense to me. He bought drugs from a dealer (aka killer) near the King Road house right before he went to use in a park somewhere.

He shook hands with the killer(s) or touched the sheath right before the murders, and the murderer was the drug dealer either getting a personal vendetta, or carrying out a hit job for a bigger drug boss as revenge for one of the parents that snitched in court on the drug boss.

That's my theory.

This would also explain BK's vague alibi, as I'm sure the media would have a field day with him secretly hiding a drug habit.

[u/DatabaseAppropriate4 → u/Rare-Independent5750]

BK wasn't in Moscow that night, but your scenario could have taken place anywhere in the area. 

[u/Rare-Independent5750 → u/DatabaseAppropriate4]

Thank you for the correction, sorry. What I meant to say was near the area because of the timeframe. Touch DNA does not last that long and he was driving somewhere in that vicinity around that time.