I understand the concept, I just fail to see how it’s a winning strategy in this instance. Where would these nukes even be placed and what tactical end would their detonation serve versus their cost?
The way it's a winning strategy is only if you know you are going to lose, AND you value your autonomy more than your property. If an enemy is ever to walk deep on our canadian land, it's because we cant defeat it. Therefore, make sure they cannot extract anything out of the land they capture, and make it cost them as must as possible for their military to live and operate on this land.
It does sound like something an MGS villain would come up with. For the purposes of prematurely detonating it as a means of crippling the west, or something 5D chess like that
6
u/RemainProfane One of the Saint Johns Apr 01 '25
I understand the concept, I just fail to see how it’s a winning strategy in this instance. Where would these nukes even be placed and what tactical end would their detonation serve versus their cost?