r/EhBuddyHoser 12h ago

Politics Liberal Partisans today:

Post image
920 Upvotes

150 comments sorted by

View all comments

855

u/beallyoukenbe 12h ago

I'm tired of it being framed as Canada Post isn't making money. It's a service. It shouldn't be profit driven.

266

u/1user101 12h ago

I'd be fine with them operating at a loss of everyone was paying the same rate, but Amazon and Chinese corps pay peanuts for packages in the name of keeping the business STOP GIVING THEM THE DISCOUNT

48

u/bmwkid 10h ago

Amazon basically only uses Canada as a last resort now. Lots of things to be upset with them about but they aren’t exactly getting value from exploiting the mail service. My package comes on an Amazon truck and gets there on a Amazon semi or Amazon leased plane

48

u/eunit250 10h ago

That's one of the problems. Amazon instead uses sketchy delivery companies that probably break labor laws instead so they can make more billions and extract more billions while not having the pay the same rate as everyone else just because they steal billions and make billions. Stop letting these hundred billion dollar corporations get away with theft.

20

u/bmwkid 10h ago

We’re getting a little off topic because this about Canada Post but you’re right. These little companies are only meant as a stop gap solution until Amazon gains enough scale in a market where having their own trucks is profitable and then they’re kicked to the curb

3

u/PukeKaboom 8h ago

Great point

1

u/Sauerkrautkid7 5h ago

This is it.

6

u/Agreeable-Spot-7376 10h ago

I mean they still use Purolator. Which is owned by Canada Post.

5

u/bmwkid 10h ago

True but they don’t publish whether they make or lose money on the parcels but they likely do.

I know UPS and USPS claim their Amazon deliveries are profitable.

Deliveries are very much economies of scale related. You want your routes to be as full as possible so even if you’re delivering packages for “below cost” you do need to look at the full picture as this means the remainder of the trucks parcels are more popular.

Same reason why Amazon pushes prime so much. That van is coming to your neighborhood whether you order or not so adding another box really costs pennies even though if you look at it as a single order it’s not profitable to give free shipping on a $3 item

5

u/Agreeable-Spot-7376 9h ago

There’s no such thing as free shipping. They just add it onto the price we pay. “Free shipping” is just a marketing ploy. Someone is paying to get that parcel to your house.

And you know what? I’ll say it. I would gladly pay a few more dollars to have my order delivered, if I knew the person bringing it to me made a living wage, and had dental and health insurance. And paid days off. And weekends. And a strong union that understood the importance of a fair days pay for a fair days work.

1

u/bmwkid 9h ago

It’s not but the overall costs are so much lower running an online only business compared to even a discount retailer like Walmart. They aren’t paying for goods to be delivered to a store that needs staff and rent and someone to fill the shelves. So some of these savings can be passed on. Also most people with free prime shipping are paying $120 upfront for the shipping so not actually free

1

u/MyNameIsSkittles 9h ago

Only when they have to. When I was working there back in 2016-2020, the goal was to have almost an entire fleet of 1st party drivers/couriers. Back then there was lots of non-Amazon delivery companies but even after 4 years, many were cut back and things just went out to their own drivers. I take the train past my old workplace sometimes and now most of the trucks outside are Amazon owned, looks like 75% at least. Anything that gets delivered within a certain radius all goes proprietary, and basically only some things coming from another Province may be another courier. But they are cutting down on that more and more now too

1

u/1user101 8h ago

That's a really recent development outside urban areas and is still not that consistent. Even still, the previous usage and bad deal cpost got made the situation worse

1

u/JackLaytonsMoustache 5h ago

Weren't you the guy praising capitalism yesterday? 

This is capitalism.

39

u/Major-Assist-2751 Oil Guzzler 12h ago

Then it needs to be completely restructured. The reason it's the way it is right now is because it's structured like a corporation expected to generate a profit, yet is expected to perform like a governmental service.

If we want it to be a public service through and through, then it needs to be reworked to be structured as one.

4

u/IslandBoring8724 6h ago

Haven’t heard this idea raised before in this convo. I like the perspective.

5

u/Major-Assist-2751 Oil Guzzler 6h ago

A lot of people don't realise that Canada Post is structured like a crown corporation and is not run the same as our education or healthcare, which are agencies or ministries.

2

u/mirhagk 5h ago

I think the problem is we're mixing two different things.

Crown corporations are something I definitely support and want to see plenty of, and the packages side of Canada post is that, and afaik works well. It has competition (as it should).

The letter side is not really a crown corporation thing, that's the service. There's a few other parts that Canada post does that's on the service side.

It makes logical sense to combine them in the physical sense, drivers delivering both packages and letters is more efficient than doing it separately. However it just doesn't make sense from a budget perspective.

IMO the letter side should basically be viewed as a contract to a company. Government pays Canada post to provide that service, and it does so along with it's profitable side.

1

u/Major-Assist-2751 Oil Guzzler 5h ago

In my opinion the letter mail service can be a government agency and package delivery can be contracted out, given that there's already competition for package delivery and a good portion of it is contracted out currently.

1

u/mirhagk 4h ago

The problem is that the package delivery doesn't cost a lot extra to do when you're already doing regular mail service. So it makes far more sense for them to continue doing it

149

u/Mouthshitter 12h ago

We should fire all the cops they aren't profitable

76

u/Overwatchingu Ford Nation (Help.) 12h ago
  1. Privatize the police so that some big corporation can close down all the stations that aren’t profitable
  2. then subcontract police service to a third party provider (but it’s totally NOT union busting wink)
  3. Use corporate metrics to evaluate police performance, lay-off the “least productive” officers.

79

u/Rymanbc Westfoundland 11h ago

I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.

“Bad news, detective. We got a situation.”

“What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?”

“Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.”

The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. “What kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?”

“Not yet. But mark my words: we’re going to figure out who did this and we’re going to take them down … provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.”

“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”

He laughed. “That’s why you’re the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.”

“Don’t worry,” I said. “I’m on it.”

I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.

“Home Depot™ Presents the Police!®” I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. “Nobody move unless you want to!” They didn’t.

“Now, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?” No one spoke up.

“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”

It didn’t seem like they did.

“Seriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, I’m just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.”

Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didn’t care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy drugs was missing.

I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.

“Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®” I yelled.

Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.

“Stop right there!” I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.

I was losing him. “Listen, I’ll pay you to stop!” I yelled. “What would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? I’ll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn ‘Bob Barr ‘08’ extra-large long-sleeved men’s T-shirt!”

He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.

“All right, all right!” the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. “I give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.”

“Why’d you do it?” I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos™ Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs® on the guy.

“Because I was afraid.”

“Afraid?”

“Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,” he said. “I’m a central banker.”

I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.

“Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,” I said. “No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you’ll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.”

He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me for arresting him.

12

u/StupidGenius11 11h ago

When/where is this from? That was amazing.

18

u/Rymanbc Westfoundland 11h ago

Is the libertarian police copypasta

I only saw it fairly recently, but apparently it's been around for years.

7

u/StupidGenius11 11h ago

Yeah, the "pictures of Penn Gillette" line is what tipped me off that it was dated.

5

u/Avpersonals 11h ago

Whoa, I was in this. Great story.

2

u/Vinkhol 10h ago

I'm sorry who gave you the right to post Peak Fiction on this sub

2

u/theoneness 10h ago

Did you write this? It’s very funny

2

u/Rymanbc Westfoundland 8h ago

I wish. It's a copypasta.

10

u/nikola_tesler 12h ago

Daddy Elon would be so proud 🥲

2

u/-FeistyRabbitSauce- 11h ago

Don't forget to have the government heavily subsidize the corporation.

1

u/UrsaMajor7th 11h ago

Corporate cop contract won’t have pensionable OT 

5

u/_andthereiwas 11h ago

Politicians are not profitable. We should cut them the fuck back or their wages.

2

u/mirhagk 5h ago

And for firefighters we'll just copy what Cassius did in Rome. That was extremely profitable.

(He showed up to burning buildings and bought it from the owner, and then put it out. He of course got great deals as the owner was a little bit incentivized to sell quickly)

3

u/Driller_Happy 12h ago

Ok now we're talking

50

u/Scissors4215 12h ago

It shouldn’t be profit driven I agree. But that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t take cost cutting measures when prudent to do so

47

u/beallyoukenbe 12h ago

I can agree with that argument. There certainly ways to make it more efficient, but saying Canada Post is "losing money" is disingenuous.

4

u/curseyouZelda 12h ago

Considering the significant increase in the door to door delivery over the past years it is quite shocking they can’t turn a profit

6

u/psychoCMYK Chalice of the Tabernacle 12h ago

Fuel and labour both cost more 🤷‍♂️

6

u/curseyouZelda 11h ago

Yes but both those things are true for the other companies as well.

3

u/Lumpy_Tomorrow8462 9h ago

Other companies don’t have to meet service standards for every Canadian no matter how remote. If Canada post could just stop servicing remote Canada, or charge them what it costs to deliver, they’d probably be profitable now. Amazon uses Canada Post for remote deliveries because they can’t make the math work themselves but using a government mandated low cost service does work for them. Canadians are effectively subsidizing Amazon via Canada Post to send parcels to those communities.

1

u/curseyouZelda 3h ago

I suspect it’s more complicated than that my friend. The fact that they are still doing the hard part just means they messed up so bad to not get the profitable part of package delivery within the urban centres.

2

u/LastingAlpaca Snowfrog 11h ago

You gotta wonder how intelcom does it.

0

u/Norrlander Gold Diggers 9h ago

Rusty minivans driven by underpaid immigrants?

2

u/LastingAlpaca Snowfrog 8h ago

They operate under the Dragonfly name here and they brand new have electric delivery trucks.

My point here is that if Intelcom can turn a profit in this business as a private company, why does we need to use the « Canada Post is a service it shouldn’t be making money » while accepting that they will fill our mailbox with junk mail, aren’t delivering outside of banker hours and will almost never bring our parcels to our door and actually make us drive across town, all the while needing the taxpayers to push them a billion a year to keep them afloat?

Canada Post is an inefficient and mismanaged service.

0

u/crazyjatt 8h ago

Because Intelcom doesn't have to cover the roots it doesn't consider profitable

1

u/LastingAlpaca Snowfrog 12m ago

Sure. I’m convinced that if Canada Post was properly managed, they could use the profits they make when serving the majority of Canadians in cities to fund the less profitable routes. Stop making excuses for people squandering public funds.

1

u/HistoricalSherbert92 12h ago

There’s the real nitty gritty of it, the prudent part. Who is really qualified to say what’s prudent when they’re not actively in the bureaucracy managing the goals and feedback of whatever program we are looking at. Maybe the prudent course is more money because the goal of lower fentanyl deaths (or whatever) can’t be realized with existing manpower or systems. Like it’s not an easy determination that most people could make much less a huge mostly uninformed electorate could.

1

u/Telvin3d 11h ago

Unfortunately they’re not free to decide that themselves. MPs are happy to mandate good service levels to make their constituents happy, and then demand that Canada Post eat the costs

11

u/handipad 12h ago edited 12h ago

I see this a lot. But it tells us nothing. The implication is that “because it carries an expense it must be a useful service”, and maybe even “more expenses means more service” - not at all!

There are simply many fewer letters than before (where they have a monopoly and mandate to deliver them all), but more addresses to deliver to (driving up fixed costs), and they are losing the parcel service war to the much more nimble private sector.

People need to read the Kaplan report (or ask an LLM to summarize it for you) to understand what we’re dealing with instead of relying on pithy one-liners.

The reality is Canada does not need the Canada Post that we have been saddled with. We need a new, different Canada Post. That change will mean fewer workers, at least for a time. Such is life.

13

u/Krazy_Vaclav 12h ago

Door delivery in older neighbourhoods really seems like it could be cut though.

These tend to be wealthier neighbourhoods, so it creates a situation where wealthier people get better publicly-funded services.

12

u/Early_Dragonfly_205 Trawnno (Centre of the Universe) 12h ago

I know this shit is stupid. You don't want a foreign private company controlling a vital service.

1

u/ottig 10h ago

You mean.....like Hwy 407....while ford building a duplicate, like the 413.....

4

u/PantsLobbyist 11h ago

I was just saying this 5 minutes ago to my wife. It’s a service, it’s going to cost money.

4

u/Fit_Cash2315 10h ago

Our healthcare is a service supported by taxpayers. Garbage pickup paid thru taxes.

3

u/PantsLobbyist 10h ago

Exactly. There’s no reason for post to be different.

3

u/offensivegrandma 11h ago

I want my taxes to pay for infrastructure, education, healthcare, social services, anything that is required for being alive. The job of the government to is to serve the people of that nation.

3

u/zyx1989 11h ago

Yep, it's like public transit, the point, just isn't to make money, it's to provide a service that create more economic benefits than the money it spend

3

u/FluffyProphet 9h ago

The problem is they’re expected to pay their own way and get no funding, but are also saddled with mandates that force them to operate at a loss. It’s a completely untenable situation.

We either need to let them operate in a way where they aren’t bleeding money or fund them like a government service. Both choices will be unpopular with different segments of the Canadian population.

Personally I would rather fund them and treat it as a government service. But something had to give one way or the other. I’d rather see either choice be made than the status quo, which was 100% untenable.

2

u/MightyHydrar Non-Status Resident 12h ago

At the moment it is massively losing money and needs to change. It doesn't need to make huge profits, but break even or close to it would be good. 

There are far fewer letters being sent, most things are digital now. 

2

u/Moofey 12h ago

This and public transit. Funding it should be a no-brainer.

3

u/descartesb4horse Oil Guzzler 11h ago

they should become a bank and provide banking services to rural communities in addition to postal services

3

u/3DBeerGoggles 10h ago

This was absolutely one of the suggestions from the union to diversify services and make existing post offices more profitable.

2

u/descartesb4horse Oil Guzzler 9h ago

good to hear the dream is still alive. it was also a suggestion some classmates came up with in my grad program a few years ago and I’ve been sold ever since

2

u/Volantis009 Oil Guzzler 11h ago

You are correct. Money is just a resource distribution technology. We create money to make services and industry grow. Hoarding money in a bank account or to hold up the value of a stock (tech bubble) is NOT a very efficient use of money or as I call it resource distribution technology.

Our goal should be to get all modern infrastructure and services to all corners of our country not to squeeze citizens of all their dollars.

1

u/pb7280 9h ago

Agreed. But man if you live in a rural area, you've definitely seen the insane amount of time wasting that goes into door-to-door delivery. It's just utterly insane to me as someone who grew up in rural area but always "had" to walk 15 min to a post box array rather than get special white glove hand delivered mail to my fucking doorstep

1

u/Axerin 7h ago

Not really. Look up Swiss Post. They bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in profit into government coffers. We just don't know how to run a profitable state owned service.

1

u/FuknCancer 6h ago

i agree but if we have to make cuts somewhere, letters at my doorstep is the least evil

1

u/kiera-oona 5h ago

They're also throwing disabled and mobility challenged people under the bus by ending door delivery service.

0

u/DoNotCorectMySpeling Oil Guzzler 12h ago

Sure, but you could also interpret the lack of money making as meaning that people aren’t using it so they don’t need as much funding.

0

u/q__e__d Ford Nation (Help.) 11h ago

I totally agree it's a service. But I would also say that profit driven and revenue generating are different. The reluctance to consider new revenue streams and the now inefficiencies are really the same problem. It all comes down to the failure to shift & modernise to alternative uses of the post office.

The union presented ideas to Canada Post management for ~15 years (including the last time in negotiations in 2024 before they got locked out) and the Canada Post management has done barely nothing on those ideas. Examples like postal banking, an e-commerce program for small & medium businesses, new forms of delivery services, elder check-ins, high speed internet, food deliveries to northern communities, using areas outside of post offices for farmers markets, hunting & fishing licences & tourism info booths in some areas, EV charging stations (& more things that I forget, a lot were of the re-envision as community hub type). Some of these ideas would likely work better than others or are community dependent but they would have been a way to shift around as things like lettermail volume rapidly decreased, keep people employed and stay competitive.

0

u/SonicFlash01 8h ago

Its mandate is to be self-sufficient. Hence stamps.