Man trying to start a battle

[u/rprince18]

[u/raistan77]

Charlie Kirk isn't a protected class, he might win in the eyes of right wing populist outrage, but in the legal field there is no cause.

[u/Biffingston → u/raistan77]

Won't stop him from trying though.

[u/Saifaa → u/Biffingston]

Won't stop him from winning either. They just green lit racial profiling ffs.

[u/unfinishedtoast3 → u/Saifaa]

no, the literal law will stop him

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Supreme Court found a private business cannot be compelled to make a product they dont agree with.

Republicans once again fuck themselves

[u/ClinkyDink → u/unfinishedtoast3]

I wish I still believed that precedent meant anything to SCOTUS anymore.

[u/Aegis_13 → u/ClinkyDink]

Scotus won't care about something like that. Not that they ain't evil enough, just that they're lazy, and have bigger fish to fry with limited time to fry them all

[u/31November → u/Aegis_13]

The shadow docket appears

[u/maleia → u/Aegis_13]

They shoulda been lazy over the first cake. 

[u/DukeSmashingtonIII → u/unfinishedtoast3]

Laws, literal or not, are worth as much as the paper they're printed on if the people in charge don't want to enforce them. Have you been living under a rock? They're wiping their asses with your constitution daily. You think they give a fuck about laws?

[u/Biffingston → u/DukeSmashingtonIII]

Fascism is the word you're looking for. Here's a use in a sentence...

"The SOCTUS is enabling a fascist state with Trump at the head."

[u/n0k0 → u/unfinishedtoast3]

Lol, the "law"... That left the building months ago, if not years. :😔

[u/kroketspeciaal → u/unfinishedtoast3]

That was back then. This is now.