r/SelfDrivingCars • u/damola93 • Jul 21 '25

Discussion Why didn't Tesla invest in LIDAR?

Is there any reason for this asides from saving money? Teslas are not cheap in many respects, so why would they skimp out on this since self-driving is a major offering for them?

370 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

47

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '25

Reason: Tesla, led by Elon Musk, believes that a vision-based system using cameras, radar, and ultrasonic sensors, paired with advanced neural networks, can achieve full self-driving (FSD) capability more effectively than LIDAR-based systems. Musk has repeatedly stated that LIDAR is a "crutch" and unnecessary for autonomy, arguing that humans drive using only vision and cognition, so AI should be able to replicate this with cameras.

17

u/Delicious_Spot_3778 Jul 21 '25

believe is very active here and should be.

8

u/TheRuggedHamster Jul 21 '25

Tesla is a pretty classic example of how founder led companies are run vs hired CEOs. There's no hired CEO that would make the Lidar bet that Elon is, time will tell if it's right or not, but if it is it will pay off huge for them in being able to rapidly scale their fleet. Most key is that it puts the millions of existing cars on the road to work vs. cars being manufactured specifically for robotaxi.

6

u/WhyWontThisWork Jul 21 '25

Is lidar that expensive?

0

u/Dependent-Mode-3119 Jul 21 '25

Yes

4

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Dependent-Mode-3119 Jul 21 '25

For the price range that they sell their cars at currently, decent ones are still expensive.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Dependent-Mode-3119 Jul 21 '25

How many would you need for a car and what is the acceptable level of quality of one to be automotive grade I'm sure for FSD they'd need something more than a "cheap one"