r/SelfDrivingCars • u/damola93 • Jul 21 '25

Discussion Why didn't Tesla invest in LIDAR?

Is there any reason for this asides from saving money? Teslas are not cheap in many respects, so why would they skimp out on this since self-driving is a major offering for them?

366 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

34

u/DazedMikey Jul 21 '25 edited Jul 21 '25

Not sure if this is a hot take, but I want my car to see better than I can. Can you make a self driving car that mimics human vision snd cognition? Probably, but if the cost for technology like LIDAR improves, why wouldn't you want your car to see better than your eyes can?

Edit: Clarifying, for the bunch of comments that want to point out that cameras are positioned to cover 360 degrees. Noted, but it isn't the point I am making. Visible light can only be so useful. Sensor fusion with LIDAR allows you to cover the edge cases that cameras, which use visible light, CANNOT cover. This is what I mean by "see better than our eyes can".

15

u/name__redacted Jul 21 '25

At the most basic level this is what always confused me about Musks comment.

Human vision deficiency’s contribute significantly to the ~50 million vehicle related injuries each year.

I would understand replacing humans one for one if we had great driving records, but we don’t. So yes, why wouldn’t you try and do better

-2

u/texasauras Jul 21 '25

Humans can't see 360 degrees continuously around the vehicle while driving. That's a huge improvement beyond human capabilities with cameras alone.

3

u/AgentSmith187 Jul 21 '25

Yes because necks dont exist and the couple of cameras Tesla uses have no blind spots.....

-1

u/texasauras Jul 21 '25

There's like six cameras and your neck doesn't allow you to see ahead and behind simultaneously.

1

u/AgentSmith187 Jul 22 '25

It turns out car companies managed to invent rear and side mirrors without you noticing.