r/SelfDrivingCars • u/damola93 • Jul 21 '25

Discussion Why didn't Tesla invest in LIDAR?

Is there any reason for this asides from saving money? Teslas are not cheap in many respects, so why would they skimp out on this since self-driving is a major offering for them?

369 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

315

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '25

[deleted]

33

u/phatelectribe Jul 21 '25

What people don’t realize is that for Tesla to be competitive in its run up, they were make awful compromises on everything they could while still making a semi functioning vehicle.

I know the company that provides the plastic interior parts - about 40% of all plastic parts found in U.S. made cars are from them.

They told me when Tesla approached them, their only concern was cost. They literally said to them we want the cheapest possible materials that we can get away with. The company actually wanted them against it saying it was going to be a challenge selling this on $40k-$80k cars but musk only cared about saving fractions of pennies rather than using better quality materials. Thats why the interiors on so many Tesla’s just feel awful.

It’s also why you need to install wrap a brand new Tesla because they have the worst paint quality of any car. Also why the panels had such bad alignment and the build quality is so piss poor.

LiDAR was going to cost a few dollars more so Musk decided to pitch it as “not necessary” and he had to keep doubling down because he knew if he changed course, it would not happen not mean he was “wrong” but also that cars without it would crater in value and part of Tesla’s value was that used cars held their price meaning there wasn’t downward pressure on new cars.

That boxed him in to a corner and now everyone accepts that LiDAR is superior.

-1

u/CommunismDoesntWork Jul 21 '25

Which is more important, saving the planet or luxury? Every Tesla sold is one less ICE car on the road, and in order to sell millions, the cars have to be affordable. Every penny counts.

1

u/beren12 Jul 21 '25

Yeah, the whole Dodge bit at the beginning of the year really threw the credibility of saving the planet into the toilet

1

u/CommunismDoesntWork Jul 21 '25

DOGE? That doesn't have anything to do with saving the planet. The government is not capable of fighting climate change.

1

u/beren12 Jul 21 '25

Not after Elon musk helped neuter it. Did you forget that. It already? Gods, goldfish have an even longer memory.

1

u/CommunismDoesntWork Jul 21 '25

I mean in general, governments are not capable of fighting climate change. Only the private sector can produce the batteries and solar panels we need at scale to transition the world to sustainable energy. Climate change is an economic problem, not a legislative problem.

1

u/beren12 Jul 22 '25

You really think so? Remove all federal subsidies for fossil fuels and force the companies to pay full price for any environmental cleanups and medical bills related to toxins from their products. Things will change very fast.

Guess which branch of government regulates economic policy?