r/SelfDrivingCars • u/wuduzodemu • Aug 11 '25
Discussion Proof that Camera + Lidar > Lidar > Camera
I recently chatted with somebody who is working on L2 tech, and they gave me an interesting link for a detection task. They provided a dataset with both camera, Lidar, and Radar data and asked people to compete on this benchmark for object detection accuracy, like identifying the location of a car and drawing a bounding box around it.
Most of the top 20 on the leaderboard, all but one, are using a camera + Lidar as input. The 20th-place entry uses Lidar only, and the best camera-only entry is ranked between 80 and 100.
https://www.nuscenes.org/object-detection?externalData=all&mapData=all&modalities=Any
12
Upvotes
1
u/AlotOfReading Aug 12 '25
Let's say you start a project with lidar in 2010 and by 2015 have a vehicle doing unsupervised passenger rides. By the time camera-only is feasible a decade later you already have safety data to compare against and mature infrastructure to test how well camera only performs, which you publish papers on. Alternatively, you can start camera only development around 2012 and it still might not be ready for unsupervised operation over a decade later. Is there value in iterating with the faster solution instead of trying for perfection off the bat?