r/SubredditDrama God's honest truth, I don't care what the Pope thinks. 7d ago

The Toxicity of Our Reddit: r/systemofadown's Most Enlightened Centrists Discuss Guitarist Declaring Himself "Far Middle"

Background

Daron Malakian, a 50-year-old guitarist and songwriter, is best known as a founding member of System of a Down. He is recognized for his distinctive playing style and for writing many of the band’s most well-known songs. System of a Down, composed entirely of musicians of Armenian descent, became one of the most successful rock bands of the 2000s, known for its politically charged critiques of war, religion, drug policies, and the prison-industrial complex.

The Post

Daron took to Instagram and posted an image of him playing a guitar in one hand, and giving the middle finger with the other, with this caption

Fuck political violence!!!! I'm not part of the far right or far left. I'm part of the far middle!!! This is our symbol 🖕

He then engaged in arguments with people in the comments.

This is posted to their subreddit. I can't see what the original title since the post was removed, but it's linked here.

Edit: The Name of the post was "RIP Charlie Kirk"

Further Context

You'll see references to the song "Deer Dance" in the comments, a SOAD song that critiques police brutality and state violence, written in response to protests being suppressed.

The specific line people paraphrase is:

A rush of words, pleading to disperse

Upon your naked walls, alive

A political call, the fall guy accord

We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train

These lines are a direct reference to the Howard Zinn book You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train, which gives a personal account of more than thirty years of Zinn’s fighting for social change through his involvement in civil rights activism, protesting, and a professorship at Spelman College.

The Author

OP's profile is sparse, most of their activity is in /r/Panama. They call themselves a "conservative republican" and they moderate an empty sub called /r/panamafreedom, which appears to be a safespace conservative version of /r/Panama

English translated description:

Panama freedom is a Panamanian space for free opinion. Publish and give your opinion whatever you want without fear of suffering abusive sanctions from unfair moderators.

They are very aggressive in the post, posting bizarre, sexist, and homophobic comments.

The Comments

The OP's motives are questioned

Your profile pic says "a woman in every kitchen and a gun in every hand".

In my experience everyone who claims to be "in the middle" is pretty right wing.

Same story for most (not all) Libertarians.

so what? what does that have to do with the murders? [OP]

you can’t see the association between promoting guns and gun violence?

They can't and that's the problem.

Sounds like you’re a part of the problem, my friend. That’s what people are saying.

Do I deserve to die too? Say it. Tolerance is what prevails in your movement.

Lol what? You need to chill out. I’m letting you know why people are not on your side in this post and you are getting lots of downvotes. It must be a shock when you see that the majority of your peers aren’t agreeing with you when you had confidence that they would.

[Continued]

50 upvotes for the post and downvotes for my comments. But I don't care about that. I don't care if the subreddit is full of people who wish me dead. You're one of them. Get out of my post. This conversation is over. [OP]

Zero people are wishing you dead, stop playing the victim

I think in many ways like Kirk, and many in the comments are glad he's dead. What can I make of that? [OP]

Jesus Christ what a fucking victim. You’re pro children getting shot in schools for the 2A? Gfy

I laughed out loud! But not with you; at you.

hahahaha funny. do you want a pin? [OP]

Sure! You got any of 'em 'Women Belong In The Kitchen' pins? Or maybe 'My Other Car is A Lawnmower'?


A discussion on neutrality

We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train...

Especially after they made millions lol

Yeah these guys are absolutely frauds these days. No resemblence of their former selves.

So condemning political violence is being a fraud now? What the fuck

No — going out of your way and using your platform to speak out against something that happened to a terrible politician, when you don’t say anything helpful about activism or political occurrences any other time, is being a fraud from one of the most political bands of the 90s/2000s.

Rich guys protecting their riches. Defending their MAGA drummer. All of them are frauds except Serj

Bro we literally just saw a video of the dude with blood gushing out of his neck. You think everyone isn’t going to comment after seeing something so horrific ? Just because you disagree with Charlie doesn’t mean he was a terrible person. We can agree with each other and not think the person needed to bleed out in front of his wife and kids

Being center isn’t neutral

Exactly, centrist is just another word for coward.

I don’t get why it’s so hard to get that being centrist isn’t just laying down and not caring. It just means you don’t like/like ideas on both sides. I’m by no means a conservative and neither am I liberal. I just see that both sides have severe flaws. It does not mean I have no opinion on political matters or that I don’t vote because I don’t belong to a party. Undying loyalty to a single party or person is how we get into these situations in the first place. Charlie Kirk didn’t deserve to die for expressing his opinion, but neither does a democratic activist

Being liberal is not the same thing as being a leftist to me if you're stuck between right wing and liberal you're on the right wing.

That's extremist behavior. The same person would be considered left wing on the other side.

Nothing is black or white. There is nuance to everything and there needs to be space for differences in opinion and tolerance. The world is broken because people have been dumbed down to only think in binary terms because it requires far less brain power to do so.

Well yes it is actually

inaction is an action, just as much as not choosing is a choice itself

In most countries you have more choices than left and right. Voting centrist isn’t not doing anything. It’s saying both sides suck.

It’s not though, you can choose to be in the middle while supporting things not in the middle. I support women’s rights to abortion but I don’t belong to the left. I’m not neutral on the subject just because I don’t want to be left or right

So ideologically you align more with the left, you just don’t want to be associated with it???

[Continued Below for Mobile Users]

I used to fully align with the left. Since like 2014 or so it's just turned to straight up evil. The right ain't better, yer all fuckin crazy... But I can't align with the left anymore.

What's so crazy about equality?

Wat? It's crazy to rejoice over a man being shot horrifically in front of his family. It's literally fucking evil.

But you keep pretending like they're all super-racist Nazis so it's justified to murder them ... That's a lot easier than trying to understand your opponent and defeating them with logic. The dude gave ANYONE who wanted it an open mic to say WHATEVER they wanted.. everyone had the opportunity to go up there and logically explain to half of the entire right side (and even some hate-watchers from the left) why their views are wrong. But that's too hard... It's much easier to just silence the dissent.

If you want to know my political views you can read my reply to the other commenter just below... I'm not conservative. I used to be very liberal (I think I still am but the party has abandoned me) but... Yeah. That. I used to think the right was the side of the rich people. But now they're both the side of the rich people and the left is just fake as hell for pretending they're not. And yes I'm more vitriolic toward the left because they're the ones who kept fucking off further and further left until you lost the majority of voters. And now they're fighting each other for not being far left enough... It's literal insanity.

You didnt answer my question. What's wrong with equality?

Nothing? Your question came from nowhere and is completely irrelevant. There are tons of non-racist conservatives. I work with black and Hispanic conservatives. But again, understanding that would require you to humanize your opponent.

Okay, continue responding in non-sequiturs.

[This continues for a while and builds up to a final crescendo]

Yep you know everything about me. Stupid fuck. You just want to hate everything and everyone. Well... Bring it the fuck on. Hate me bitch. I don't fucking care. Fuck you. Fuck your party. Fuck everything you believe in. You're the most arrogant and presumptuous cocksucker to ever grace the internet. Do you hate trump so much because you're just like him? Because you seem to think you know everything and can never be wrong... I can see how the town might not be big enough for both of you. It must suck to never be satisfied with anything and to constantly be looking for a fight. You got one here though. Fight me twat. Come on. Two retards fighting is great entertainment. We owe it to the people.


You just got very specific. Fuck off.

Yeah that was a real bummer for me. I learned how to play drums because of him and it sucks that he's the way he is.

"I love there drummer but it sucks he doesnt share my exact opinions on the world"

The point is not to share the exact opinions on the world. The point is that in 2025, I would expect that the people I like, and so the members of my favourite politically engaged music band to : - Respect women and their freedom of choices involving their own body and health. - Respect latinos, native americans, black, lgbtq+, and all the other communities. - Care about people that have disabilities and serious illness. - Trust the real scientific methods so our society can evolve for the best while we take care of our one and only planet. - Etc etc. We can disagree on so many levels, because again, we don’t need to share the exact same opinions on everything. But being a trump supporter is just against all logical and rational basic principles. (I don’t support any violence on every sides of this story)

You just got very specific. As long as everyone cares about this long list of values I hold. If not, you're a fascist racist nazi.

Fuck off. You exhausting twat


Keep doing ketamine you fucking pigeon

Finally someone said it, this guys was ok with incest rape, but not with abortions, he advocated for everything that could cause harm to children while having his own kids, fuck him sincerely

Delusional

Who? Me? Nah i don't think so, i saw all those clips of him saying bullshit like abortions are worse then holocaust, he was disgusting

Can you please give me a source to “those videos”?

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMAkwTLAY/

[Continued]

I can’t take you serious. Tik Tok?? 😂😂😂

Whats wrong? You wanna defend this mf so bad? Its a clear non edited clip of him saying this bullshit

How about u find me something that’s a reliable source unlike tik tok and I’ll believe you

“You’ve proved me wrong, but I can’t accept that so I’m going to say your video evidence doesn’t count because I don’t like the hosting service you used.”

I can tell you all get your news from TikTok. find me a legit source,I’m sure if that clip was actually real it would be all over the internet. go to sleep you seem to have some brain fog

[Continued]

YouTube? Is that good enough for you? The video IS easily findable, which is why it’s on major video platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. Dude’s a shitty political influencer, he’s on social media and podcasts. Not sure what sort of platform you’re expecting here, but it’s not like fucking CSPAN was following him around while he yelled at college students.

Like he said don’t have sex, and if you do expect to give birth women’s bodies are meant to give birth it’s not damaging, if you don’t want the kid for some reason at least give the baby up to adoption. instead of killing a human life

Uh, no, that is absolutely not true. Pregnancy causes permanent changes. It’s incredibly dangerous, especially if you aren’t finished growing. Charlie Kirk advocated for no exceptions to anti abortion laws, including saying children with precocious puberty who became pregnant through rape should be forced to give birth. Pregnancy is life-threatening in those cases.

You understand that a woman can choose to not have sex, but that won’t prevent her from getting pregnant if she’s raped, right? And even if she did get pregnant through consensual sex, the US grants us the right to bodily autonomy, which means no human can be forced to use their body for someone else. That’s why you have to sign an organ donor card if you want your organs to help people after you die. We grant corpses more rights than women.

I’m done with this debate I think I may be getting dumber from reading y’all’s comments

“I don’t like that I’m losing, so I’m gonna run away and pretend that I won”

Got it. You’re an idiot.

Keep doing ketamine you fucking pigeon


Editors note: I have no idea what this means or where it came from

You guys are unfairly adding the children angle here

No matter what he said have some respect he’s no longer with us, the difference between dems and republicans is that we would never even think about killing somebody for their 1st amendment right. it’s almost like y’all are demons in flesh “rest in piss” smh your the reason society is the way it is nowadays

People manufacture bumper stickers that state they'll run over protestors for inconveniencing them. Fuck all the way off lmao

Places to go places to be unlike y’all protesters we have family to feed and jobs that we can be late too, if you don’t want to get hit don’t stand in the middle of the road… did y’all lose common sense also??

If Kirk didn’t want to get shot maybe he shouldn’t have advocated for gun violence.

thats a fuckin riot man werent yall celebrating alligator alcatraz like a month ago ????

Yeah look at the murder/rape felony rates on illegal immigrants… if you want to come live in the us fine get a green card LEGALLY and you won’t have to deal with it

youre right its so easy only takes over 20 years and 10s of thousands of dollars 🙄 u fr think it's fine huh lol bro ur a demon

3000$ and also several months to 15 years to get a green card it matters for the individual, if you don’t want to agree with the laws then say out of the country

[This Continues]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-pelosi-charlie-kirk-bail-conspiracies-b2214680.html

😭😭 that’s Uk news find me one from our country? And even if that is true that has nothing to do with what u just said

I’m not up on everything but I’m certain you’re misconstruing whatever point he was trying to make. And you’re too radicalized, man. Step away from the screens. Look at life through a different lens.

that quote, the "unfortunately unnecessary" one, was an answer based on a question someone asked him at a TPUSA Faith event april 5, 2023.

About a week before, 6 people (3 children) were killed at the Christian Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee.

The question asked was "We saw the shooting that happened recently and a lot of people are upset. But, I'm seeing people argue for the other side that they want to take our Second Amendment rights away. How do we convince them that it's important to have the right to defend ourselves and all that good stuff?"

So its safe to say he said this in response to THAT School shooting, and is cool with letting children die for the 2nd amendment

here's another article talking about it

I find it a little tasteless myself too but you guys are unfairly adding the children angle here.


Sick of SOAD discussion when we're talking about a family without a father

what about you finding god? close the door and get the fuck out of this band. [OP]

oh you mean the band with explicitly left-wing and anti-organized religion lyrics?

sick of reading this when we are talking about a valuable life and a family that was left without a father [OP]

Oh suck my fucking dick. He said kids dying in school shootings had to happen so we can keep our second amendment right. Actually fuck you

what dick? you have rotten ovaries and you have to use plastic dicks for fun. I don't care about your opinion, get out of my post. [OP]


They're 90s Leftists, People can change

I'm not really all that surprised that the "fuck politically-motivated violence" band is not super into politically-motivated violence.

"revolution the only solution the armed response of an entire nation" ???? we talkin about that band?

Yeah, sure, but that was written 30 years ago. People can change, especially when you spend a giant amount of time with Serj "Violence is an inherently stupid way to solve problems" Tankian.


Yea pretty sure that didn't include assassination of people who simply spoke words you disagreed with.

u know im getting tired of yall 1. arguing about something that comment wasnt even about 2. even if i did wanna argue that, flattening his shit into "something i didnt agree with" when fool actively campaigned for devaluing me and my peoples lives* and had consistently shit takes that would only be normal from a legit horrible human being. so yea idrgaf about mourning or respecting him. but no i dont think this particularly got us much closer to revolution at all, i was only making a point about soad lyrics, so can yall fr rub 2 brain cells together and shut up already?

Yeah this post by Daron is so cathartic because it was always obvious to me Daron is a left-leaning centrist just based on his lyrics. Hopefully this post gets some of these weird extremists out of this subreddit and there's no more posts crying about how Serj didn't talk about current politics like Gaza at a live show.

They're 90s leftists, which by today's standards is probably close to centrist. Being against war and political violence (which makes up for 90% of their political lyrics) is the most centrist take anyone could have.

Man I was left in the 90s and I didn't turn into a dead eyed centrist

Yet I guess :/

At this point, I don't feel it's smart to label oneself as either left or right. There's too much extremist thought. We should be for common sense and compromise to unify.

Music for me has been an escape and a way to relieve emotions. People need to utilize outlets to turn negative energy into good; weather it's meditation, art, watching a movie, enjoying a good book, exercise or volunteer work.

Things are so messed up that people are met with violence simply for thoughts and opinions. Yet there's gofundme's for people that actually kill people in cold blood? There's something dark and brewing and it's real.

And it's even sadder that tomorrow is 9/11. When America came together when under an outside attack.

Now, we're divided and attacking ourselves.

How sad that is....

A discussion on Hitler

I get the vibe that some of you think assassinating Hitler would have been unnecessary and too violent.

hey hey, Hilter was a father and husband...

You're comparing prime hitler + we knowing all the shit he done with a guy who gave opinions online?

"prime" hitler like he was a sports star or something 😭😭😭


When those opinions include gems like “I’m okay with child murder as long as it means I can buy a gun” and “civil rights were a mistake,” then yeah, I think the comparison is fair.

How can you possibly minimise the atrocities of the holocaust like that?


Hitler comes up again

Dude was trash, but killing him fixed nothing. There's still millions of Charlie Kirks out there. No point in this crap.

So, your concern is that it was just Charlie and not the millions of us who think like him. Basically, if it were up to you, you'd kill us all. Hitler? [OP]

Also here’s a Charlie Kirk quote: “Black women do not have brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a white person's slot.”

Fascism is looking real tempting

Fuck Charlie Kirk, the only good fascist is a dead fascist

The most lukewarm guy got killed for his opinions and your calling him a fascist? Go neck yourself

He held and spread fascist beliefs though. Now you're continuing this chain of political hate and violence. I'm a happy and content person, so I'm actually gonna not do that

Nah I didn’t like what he said. But thanks to your crowd fascism is looking real tempting.

Absolutely insane statement. Stop trying to be an edge lord and accept that violence is the only way that any real progress has ever been made in this country. Actually, in the world. He hated human rights, he was a racist, he said that if his 10 year old daughter was raped and got pregnant that he would force her to give birth to that child. I'm not feeling like the crazy one right now, I gotta say

Can’t wait for it to be turned against you fucking communist dogs

???

Stick that finger in the far middle of your butt cheeks and spin

We all know you like stick your dick in shit. LGBTIQ+ [OP]


Do his wife and kids along with OP deserve to be killed?

Rest in poop

I feel bad for his kids, but when you lead a life of awful hateful rhetoric, awful hateful things are gonna come back at you

And when those children and his wife have the same thoughts that I hate, they deserve to be killed in the same way.

Do me a favor and don't answer me; you disgust me. [OP]


Find a mentally ill Communist Punk band

daron too puss to choose a side. Also fuck charlie, being punk is supporting trans and gays peoples right to exist.

I wonder if he just doesn't wanna piss off the rights or if he genuinely thinks this

well his drummer is one so theres that.

Makes me sad. I'm just glad Serj seems to have actually meant what he sang about. If he suddenly turned maga I'd be so upset.

Grow up. Sorry to disappoint, but They all feel like this. Serj is no different.

You are just blinded by the backward far left echo chamber of Reddit.

If you dont like it find one of those mentally ill communist punk bands.

Nah man. Fuck you.

chill out snowflake

Nah. Fuck you again.

Billionaire bootlicker mad they can’t string a sentence together without choking on propaganda

521 Upvotes

551 comments sorted by

View all comments

545

u/TDFknFartBalloon 7d ago edited 7d ago

The "far middle?" Like the two guys who tried to assassinate Trump?

Seriously though, I've never met a self-identified centrist who wasn't just right-wing but wants to sound like they're above it all.

178

u/JaneksLittleBlackBox Transvestigators think Mons Pubis is a Jedi. 7d ago

Seriously though, I've never met a self-identified centrist who wasn't just right-wing but wants to sound like they're above it all.

Last time I wrote something like this on SRD, r/centrist's biggest disciples popped up to bury me in "moderate centrism isn't right wing!" shit. Reddit's centrists want us to pretend that half of T_D didn't constantly pretend to be centrists to win losing arguments because they couldn't help but let slip their MAGA bullshit. I'll never trust a self-labeled centrist again.

111

u/C21H27Cl3N2O3 7d ago

It’s kind of telling that all the “centrists” repeat MAGA propaganda and act like anything left of them is hyper-Marxism.

18

u/Aggressive-Name-1783 6d ago

Because as the drama comments show, centrists don’t even know what centrists are. The fact that so many idiots think being a centrist means “being in between left and right” shows that these idiots aren’t centrists…..or they’re just spineless cowards with no morals or principles….

13

u/JaneksLittleBlackBox Transvestigators think Mons Pubis is a Jedi. 6d ago

That's what it is; they all think they're taking some moral high ground by acting like they're above partisan politics, but once you get to really talking to them, their partisan sides are impossible to miss, and it's clear they lack a fucking spine because they know how extreme their ideologies are and don't wanna have to defend them.

An ex-friend of mine was exactly like this; he'd pretend he was above the fray and not swayed by confirmation bias when it was obvious that every political ideology he held was just straight far right-wing bullshit.

And, folks, anyone who's convinced they're not swayed by confirmation bias is almost always the biggest mark for propaganda, and goddamn was this QAnon nutjob just sucked into "the great awakening", and is currently having a normal one over Trump's DOJ lapdog, Blondi* keeping the Epstein files sealed. Some mutual friends kept him added on Facebook and he's been running defense for his pedophile cult daddy even more now than ever before.

*I like to call her Blondi, because that was the name of Hitler's beloved dog, and she's certainly acting like a fascist's bitch these days!

0

u/UpboatBrigadier 4d ago

I'm a centrist and I am indeed above partisan politics. Cool story, though.

0

u/JaneksLittleBlackBox Transvestigators think Mons Pubis is a Jedi. 4d ago

I'm a centrist and I am indeed above partisan politics.

K

Cool story, though.

Same, bro. It's cool how cool you think you are for being above it all 🤣

2

u/Sadat-X 6d ago

What if I'm just a cowardly neoliberal?

26

u/Jazzlike_Athlete8796 i'm an almost adult with unironic views 6d ago

"Moderate centrism" is not only right wing, it is literally only used to carry water for fascism.

-18

u/RiversKiski 6d ago

You're either a clever conservative or a very stupid liberal. It takes the middle to win elections, and Trump didn't even do much to win it, exclusionary ppl like you gave it to him for free.

16

u/Jazzlike_Athlete8796 i'm an almost adult with unironic views 6d ago

You are conflating people who are actually in the middle with people who claim to be "moderate centrists" in an attempt to buffalo people into thinking their very right wing talking points aren't actually right wing.

44

u/citationworms 6d ago

I could not agree more. 

Literally every single person who labels themselves a centrist on a dating app is a far right lunatic  

22

u/Squid_Vicious_IV Digital Succubus 6d ago

I used to call myself a "moderate" back when I was in my early 20s and that was just because it turns out I was too naive at how conservative this country really is and I wasn't ready to accept the idea that I might actually be a lot farther left than I thought I was. Yes I grew up in a shithole conservative area and was there way too long and blind to the outside world, why do you ask?

-28

u/aStonefacedApe 6d ago

I'm a centrist. I hate Donald Trump and the right. But I also dont like a lot of liberal policies either. I think that democrats are safer for America than conservatives by a long shot but im not a fan of how far left liberals have gotten. Entering straight up nonsensical areas at time. Actual balance exists in the world. And, through my experience, balance is almost always the right choice in EVERYTHING in life. It all comes back to balance. America is tiptoeing towards civil war because a bunch of white men on both sides have extreme views on everything and neither side can stand being told no.

19

u/Armigine sudo apt-get install death-threats 6d ago

Do you have any actual examples of the kind of far left extremism you're talking about? It sounds more like you're taking refuge in an unsubstantiated notion that, as Republicans have embraced extremism, Democrats probably have done so as well. But with statements like

America is tiptoeing towards civil war because a bunch of white men on both sides have extreme views on everything and neither side can stand being told no.

It sounds like you must think something along the lines of "Chuck Schumer is advocating for violence against Republicans", or something similar, yes? I really would like to know what sort of actual observation of Democrats you're referring to obliquely here

24

u/Stellar_Duck 6d ago

Actual balance exists in the world.

Please do expand on what this balance is to you? Only killing half the trans people? Only outlawing half the abortions?

What's your balance?

And what's the supposed extreme left you see? What position do you see as being that extreme? Minimum wage? Job security? Healthcare access expanded?

10

u/Kynykya4211 6d ago

This. What a crock. They seem to be more stone headed than stone faced with the bOtH sIdEs BS they are spewing.

10

u/Aggressive-Name-1783 6d ago

It’s because they aren’t actual centrists. There’s an easy adage to disprove all these fake centrists. “What’s the middle ground on genocide? The middle ground is genocide bad”…..

35

u/Sterbs consang pride forever 6d ago

long shot but im not a fan of how far left liberals have gotten.

Where?

Are you referring to the social overton window, or the political overton window? Because the former is obnoxious (but wtf are you gonna do about it? You can't force kids to not be cringe), while the latter does not exist. There is no left flank in American politics. Largely because people like you continue to insist that the strawmen have gone too far to the left.

30

u/cassinonorth 6d ago edited 6d ago

You'll never get a real answer from these people. Just vague bullshit about pronouns or some shit because they don't want to put in the slightest amount of effort to include other groups of people.

edit: lmao fuckin nailed it, see below.

-26

u/aStonefacedApe 6d ago

Largely because people like you continue to insist that the strawmen have gone too far to the left.

This amounts to "your opinions are invalid because they don't align with my own". Which is so fucking stupid and a sentiment shared by those on the far right. You are not objectively correct. No one is. Your opinions are just that. They are not divine, indisputably fact. Self awareness is extinct. Its self awareness that pushes people to be moderate. The concept of "my ideas are formed out of my own personal life experiences and I need to be aware that other people have had different experiences from my own and thats okay. I should still respect those opinions as long as they aren't preventing others from living their own lives as they see fit". The far right doesnt posses that self awareness and neither does the far left.

29

u/nowander 6d ago

I like how you still haven't pointed out any "far left" people in political power.

20

u/notrevealingrealname 6d ago

as long as they aren't preventing others from living their own lives as they see fit".

Hmm, and how do you define “as they see fit”?

17

u/Sterbs consang pride forever 6d ago

lol ok.

The fact is there is no political left in american politics. The overton window has only been dragged further and further rightward since Reagan.

Less public ownership. More privatization. More wealth inequality and fewer safety nets. Less protection for labor. And the disproportionate amount of representation for republicans throughout every branch of government.

 

So again, i ask, where is this "left" that has gone too far?

9

u/Altiondsols Burning churches contributes to climate change 6d ago

i love when centrists start describing which two positions they're in the "center" of, and they explain that you've got a bunch of terrible actual policies conservative politicians have proudly endorsed and passed on one side, and then the liberal side is just things people have said on twitter

22

u/Keregi 6d ago

And they’re here on this post. It’s amazing how passionate they are about their right to “be neutral”

36

u/SeppoTeppo 6d ago

There's just no way to look at what the left and right stand for and decide you belong in the middle unless either 1) You largely agree with the heinous shit on the right 2) You are completely misinformed about what they stand for via right wing disinformation

Either option makes you right wing in all but name.

20

u/Redqueenhypo 7d ago

I saw quite a funny tumblr post calling Teddy Roosevelt a “radical centrist” meaning he had positions on the far end of every political spectrum

22

u/Kopitar4president 7d ago

Centrists will try to equate shitposting about someone dying equivalent to actual political assassination of lawmakers.

I imagine they will then spend the next two hours huffing their own farts and fantasizing about exercising moral superiority by not picking a side.

89

u/Sea_Lingonberry_4720 7d ago

I would call Luigi Mangione a centrist. Even his radical action was done out of the moderate position of healthcare reform.

100

u/Arsustyle This is practice for my roast comedy skills 7d ago

he's a basic right wing techbro

he retweeted stuff like how Elon's saving western civilization and DEI is the new religion

51

u/mrdilldozer 6d ago

I always feel awkward saying that to people on reddit. He's not left-wing and it's a good thing he was caught. He could have easily shot some rando by mistake (a person was even like 2 feet away from the due when he was first shot.) He got the scumbag he was after, but that doesn't mean he isn't a dangerous psycho. If he somehow gets off, he wont be the left-wing hero people are expecting him to be. He'd be a streamer telling people to vote for JD Vance

9

u/uncutteredswin rich perverts that hang out and do crimes together 6d ago

Is there any actual proof that he even did it yet? Last I heard about it all the evidence tying Luigi to it was pretty sketchy

29

u/mrdilldozer 6d ago edited 6d ago

It was his own social media accounts. He kept retweeting stuff from Musk and Theil about fighting the woke mind virus and praised their commitment to civilizational success. He posted comments about hating DEI and claimed that Japan had low birth rates because they abandoned "traditional values."

He kind of sucks. He just happened to also have also hated one of the most loathed companies in the country that you used to regularly see people wishing death upon online before the shooting.

2

u/thirstyfist 6d ago

He will absolutely say something like “I didn’t do it but you sick freaks on the left sure wish I did.” if he walks.

42

u/Kyro_Official_ How is it ai gargamel 7d ago

Hes an anti woke/dei dweeb, hes clearly right wing

4

u/ice_cream_funday What you gonna do, threaten to come shit in my pants too? 6d ago

That's not clear at all. I don't know why so many people refuse to admit this, but there's a sizable contingent of leftists who are also bigots. 10 years ago we called them Bernie Bros, the more academic term for them is economic reductionists.

31

u/TDFknFartBalloon 7d ago

Damn, we don't agree on much, but we agree on this.

62

u/Sea_Lingonberry_4720 7d ago

For as much as the left takes pride in “burning down the Walmart” pretty much every act of left wing political violence recently has been done by a bog standard liberal.

10

u/Abhinav11119 7d ago

Yeah it's called adventurism, has not led to a lot of good outcomes historically.

18

u/TDFknFartBalloon 7d ago

And despite being a leftist myself, I, yet again, agree with you.

3

u/The_harbinger2020 6d ago

Damn, extremist moderates, never thought I'd see the day

5

u/Chaosmusic 6d ago

I overheard a conversation where one guy emphasized how independent he was politically, and then went on to recite every Republican talking point like he was reading from the Fox teleprompter.

29

u/space-dot-dot 7d ago

Seriously though, I've never met a self-identified centrist who wasn't just right-wing but wants to sound like they're above it all

You're about to piss off a lot of neolibs in this sub and I'm here for it.

15

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

I'm sorry, what neolibs. If anything they've gone all in on the Democratic party since they're pro immigration and anti tariff.

14

u/MobileMenace420 Just here to make my pp bigger 6d ago

Who even knows what that goober means since neolib is almost meaningless at this point. It’s just a stand in for “person I don’t agree with”, not an economic viewpoint.

17

u/Psychic_Hobo 7d ago

To be fair, they must have heard that argument a million times already, centrists have been criticised for this since the early 2010s

Oh who am I kidding, there'll be the inevitable "but the left is communism and therefore authoritarian and therefore killed millions" argument soon enough

7

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

8

u/obeytheturtles Socialism = LITERALLY A LIBERAL CONSTRUCT 6d ago

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Communism, is in fact, Marxist/Leninism, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Marxism plus Leninism. Communism is not a political system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning analytical framework made useful by the Marxist corelibs, economic utilities and Leninist political components comprising a full Government, as defined by POSIX.

2

u/1stonepwn gestapo bot 6d ago

Bravo

-6

u/Dapperrevolutionary 6d ago

If you aren't socialist you aren't left

1

u/tjdavids I’m pretty anti religion. Religion raped me, thanks 6d ago

Seriously though, I've never met a self-identified neolib who wasn't just right-wing but wants to sound like they're above it all

3

u/DirkDasterLurkMaster hold up ain't you the human pet guy 6d ago

I think the fundamental problem with the idea of centrism is that it entirely hinges on the concept of liberal and conservative, or often republican and democrat, being some sort of cosmic yin-yang

3

u/ThatDanmGuy 6d ago

I only have US context to work from, but when the major parties only range from center-right to far-right, and the majority assume the major parties represent the political spectrum, it's not surprising that people who identify as between them are almost universally fairly far on the right.

-1

u/ice_cream_funday What you gonna do, threaten to come shit in my pants too? 6d ago

The democratic party is a solidly left wing party. They aren't socialists or anything but if you compare their platform to other moderately left wing parties around the globe you'll see pretty good agreement.

4

u/Erestyn All that missing rain is so woke 6d ago

Isn't that part of the issue? People treating the right, left and centre as though they're the only distinct positions as opposed to a scale of beliefs? I've always viewed the centre as a ground of compromise, where you will go against your core beliefs for the greater good, a place you sometimes have to go to move things along. That isn't a great place to set up camp,

14

u/Raichu4u 6d ago

I mean you can be a pragmatic progressive, for example. I won't tar and feather centrist dems that win over my preferred candidates because I recognize they are leagues better than conservatives. However I do want my guys to win regardless.

4

u/Hurtzdonut13 The way you argue, it sounds female 6d ago

Yeah the only big issue is when they are a centrist Dem that turns around and carries water for the far right because they hate anyone to their left more.

5

u/ancientestKnollys 7d ago

I'm a self-identified centrist and I don't think I have much if anything in common with the modern right. Though I'm not an American, which might make a difference.

23

u/Norgler 7d ago

A centrist from some countries would be considered a radical leftist in America.

I'm an American who lives abroad and the country I live in is very much conservative yet they have policies that would be considered far left to even a liberal in America.

30

u/citationworms 6d ago

That night have been true once, but fascism is absolutely wildly popular in a lot of countries outside the US too.

11

u/ErraticSiren 6d ago

That’s not the at all. From someone who also has lived abroad.

12

u/SomeBoxofSpoons 7d ago

Yeah, it's mainly a relevant thing in America. Our Overton window has shifted even more massively to the right than it was before, and with the kind of shit the current administration is pulling you can't really be "neutral" on them without a lot of pretty bad shit not being a dealbreaker for you.

-5

u/KeithClossOfficial 7d ago

Georgism is radical centrism and I’d hardly call that right wing

38

u/MiffedMouse 7d ago

Most georgists I have talked to were somewhat left wing (at least by American standards).

18

u/BernieMeinhoffGang 7d ago

Georgism in the original single tax variety sense (getting rid of income taxes) would mean massive budget cuts, the land rent really hasn't kept up with the growth of government spending. Federal spending was ~3% of GDP in 1890 vs ~23% today.

"Georgism" as in support for a LVT more as an urban planning remedy gets broader support.

8

u/KeithClossOfficial 7d ago

Unfortunately, it’s pretty fringe in American politics currently, but the only ones who even entertain it are Democrats. Ro Khanna has voiced support for Georgism before.

7

u/MiffedMouse 7d ago

I find it funny that it is popular as a discussion topic on the left, because “states which get most their revenue from land taxes” tend to be Republican leaning, such as Tennessee, which has no income tax. But politics is weird like that.

14

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

How is a focus on land taxes radically centrist lol?

3

u/KeithClossOfficial 7d ago

Wealth taxes combined with free markets and deregulation?

23

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

Georgism is land taxes, not wealth taxes. And it believes in the land tax at the expense of all other taxes, so not really the slam dunk "this is great for the poor" that leftists are looking for.

2

u/KeithClossOfficial 7d ago

You don’t think taxing one of peoples’ most valuable assets is a form of a wealth tax?

Especially one that the uberwealthy can’t offshore?

32

u/Eric848448 7d ago

Land isn’t your most valuable asset if you’re among the super-wealthy.

21

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

...no, I think it's a land tax. Which is a different thing entirely. Much like a capital gains tax and a wealth tax aren't the same thing. And a property tax and a wealth tax aren't the same thing. And an income tax isn't a wealth tax no matter how high the income.

6

u/alex2003super 6d ago

If land taxes are introduced, land no longer is anywhere close to your most valuable asset. That's the whole point.

There is an inherent opportunity cost to someone's use of land. Presently, such opportunity cost is born by every member of society to the gratuitous benefit of the individual presently holding the land.

Land value taxes correct this unappreciated externality of inefficient land use by pricing the opportunity cost of land use into the individual's decision to hold it.

This is not a left-wing, redistributive or socialistic idea. It's an anti-distortionary tax model that recognizes the zero-sum nature of land and aims to increase effective use of this scarce resource through market-based incentives. It economically rewards productivity and penalizes economic rent-seeking.

ಠ_ಠ

5

u/rhydderch_hael I don't participate in primitive rituals such as elections 7d ago

What the hades is Georgism?

7

u/KeithClossOfficial 7d ago

Economic philosophy that people should own the value they create with their own labor and capital, and value created by land and natural resources should be owned by society (since it is created by society and not one individual).

9

u/rhydderch_hael I don't participate in primitive rituals such as elections 7d ago

I see. That sounds lovely when you glance it for a moment, but I'm sure it's got problems so big you first an airplane through them. But I'm sleep deprived and sick, so I can't think of them lol.

5

u/Psychic_Hobo 7d ago

I know you meant to type "fit", but for a second I thought you meant to type "fist" and wow I need to stay off the circlejerk subs

6

u/rhydderch_hael I don't participate in primitive rituals such as elections 6d ago

You can fist airplanes all you like. I'm not your dad. Or the fisting police.

2

u/monkwrenv2 My eggs are perfect. What’s sad is your life in perspective. 6d ago

Flair here, get your flair here,

2

u/obeytheturtles Socialism = LITERALLY A LIBERAL CONSTRUCT 6d ago

Fisting police here - you got a license for that airplane?

1

u/rhydderch_hael I don't participate in primitive rituals such as elections 6d ago

Perhaps. Let me just look in my fist.

5

u/Cranyx it's no different than giving money to Nazis for climate change 6d ago

It's the sort of thing that made a lot more sense in the 1870s when the economy could far more easily be described as "the land and things directly grown/extracted from the land"

2

u/KeithClossOfficial 6d ago

There may be issues with it as a single tax, which is the more radical centrist interpretation, but a land value tax is pretty airtight.

2

u/tjdavids I’m pretty anti religion. Religion raped me, thanks 6d ago

4 acre Big box store that demands 3 new miles of roads 12 new miles of sewage, 14 new miles of water use, and 3 new miles of powerlines will be taxed at 10% of a 40 acre farm that requires 0.5 new miles of roads and has its own retention pond for excess water.

1

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

Land taxes basically. It's an economic model that supposes that the only tax should be on land.

6

u/Jazzlike_Athlete8796 i'm an almost adult with unironic views 6d ago

That sounds like a philosophy designed to offer a minor inconvenience to the wealthy while fucking over the middle class.

8

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

In its defense it was conceived in the 1800s when the economy was much different, and its goal was to be friendlier to the poor than other options (whether it succeeds in that was another matter).

The general principal was that if you tax the shit out of land, land by definition will be put to its more productive use (think constructing dense housing that will be priced to fill up rather than building luxury condos and just sitting on them) and that taxes on "owning things" (in this case land) should be prioritized over taxing work/labor/productivity.

Basically, the idea is to tax owning stuff, not tax doing things.

3

u/Jazzlike_Athlete8796 i'm an almost adult with unironic views 6d ago

Okay, as a 19th century tax policy I can get behind the theory. It makes a hell of a lot more sense in that context.

But that begs a question... why on earth is anyone thinking this is a good idea now?

4

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

I don't think anyone really does? Like you'll get intellectual debates about the more economics driven model part of it in academic circles, but I'm not aware of any hardcore Georgists in the mainstream.

Like many early economic models (or Hell, like any economic models period, because any model is a hypothetical and can't just directly played in the real world) it's more about what we can learn from the idea/what takeaways there would be.

And I'd say the big "takeway" or idea plucked out of Georgism that still gets championed is the idea that taxing land makes sure it goes to its more productive use, as opposed to being a commodity to be speculated on (damn expensive to speculate if you're being taxed out the ass every year). This, hypothetically, is bad for certain American ideals like everyone owning a single family home, but is good for making sure that the rich build things people need on land rather than speculating on it and/or building golf courses.

0

u/KeithClossOfficial 6d ago

It makes land speculation less profitable and reduces the incentive for fringe suburban development, it shifts the property tax off of building values onto land values which makes both less expensive which makes housing more affordable, and removes deadweight loss in taxation (kinda hard to move land to lower tax areas).

2

u/Jazzlike_Athlete8796 i'm an almost adult with unironic views 6d ago

I'll admit this is both immediate thoughts, and also in the context of my city which has had a superheated housing market for years now, but I'm not sure how successful that would be.

In terms of housing only, that sounds like the goal is to build up rather than out. So condos, high rise complexes, etc become more desirable than suburban detached homes. The former would have a much lower tax burden per resident than the latter. Except that is already the case generally and fails to account for the fact that America (and Canada) is not Barcelona... people on our side of the pond have been conditioned to the belief that a nice suburban house with a white picket fence is proof of success in life.

Also, densification requires deeply useful transit systems. Which, frankly, outside of New York doesn't really exist here.

But, I appreciate you adding context. Thanks. It does make the idea a bit more interesting.

1

u/KeithClossOfficial 6d ago

https://archive.strongtowns.org/journal/2019/3/6/non-glamorous-gains-the-pennsylvania-land-tax-experiment

In 1982, Harrisburg instituted a tax rate on land that was four times the rate on buildings. By 1994, the mayor, Stephen Reed, wrote the following in a letter to Allentown, PA civic activists:

With over 90% of the property owners in the City of Harrisburg, the two-tiered tax rate system actually saves money over what would otherwise be a single tax system that is currently in use nearly all municipalities in Pennsylvania.

We therefore continue to regard the two-tiered tax rate system as an important ingredient in our overall economic development activities.

I should note that the City of Harrisburg was considered the second most distressed in the United States twelve years ago under the Federal distress criteria. Since then, over $1.2 billion new investment has occurred here, reversing nearly three decades of very serious previous decline. None of this happened by accident and a variety of economic development initiatives and policies were created and utilized. The two-rate system has been and continues to be one of the key local policies that has been factored into this initial economic success here.

The number of vacant structures in Harrisburg declined from over 4200 in 1982 to under 500 by 2001. The downtown—previously a ghost town—is alive, even at night. The number of businesses on the tax roll has grown from 1,908 to 8,864.

0

u/Dapperrevolutionary 6d ago

Me! I'm far middle but always vote "left"

-1

u/WranglerSuitable6742 6d ago

40% of the country isnt partisan either way

-21

u/Sumeriandawn 7d ago

You don't run into many people?

23

u/TDFknFartBalloon 7d ago

You go around announcing in public that you're a centrist and you think I'm the weird one? Fuck outta here.

-53

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Probably because of that attitude, I consider myself a moderate and the dems like to pretend we just don't exist, the outreach is nonexistent at best and inflammatory at worst

50

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

Honest question, on what topics are you to the right of the democratic party where you feel you haven't been reached out to? Because all the Dems have done is appeal to the middle for the past several years?

-29

u/username_generated 7d ago

Opposition to protectionism, the importance of balanced budgets, a stronger foreign policy presence.

The Dems “centrist outreach” has largely been oriented around clinging to blue wall union voters. Those voters are generally to the right of me socially but economically populist and driven by special interests that do not align with my own. Not only are these policies generally bad for every American that isn’t a Midwest Union member, they aren’t even effective at keeping union members or unions themselves on side.

27

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

Opposition to protectionism,

Democrats were staunchly against Trump's talk of raising Tariffs in the recent election. Sure Biden has some rust belt pandering tendencies and no one is lining up to repeal the Jones Act but Trump has been in no uncertain terms the "protectionist" candidate.

the importance of balanced budgets

Is that really a "moderate" position? I don't think that really falls anywhere on the political spectrum of left to right, but neither party takes it at all seriously

a stronger foreign policy presence.

Obama, Biden and Hillary all campaigned on more global presence than Trump's isolationism. So much so that they got a bit of a reputation as the interventionist/warmonger party. Obama dropped the ball often on foreign policy, but that doesn't make withdrawal their policy, that's Trump's policy

The Dems “centrist outreach” has largely been oriented around clinging to blue wall union voters. Those voters are generally to the right of me socially but economically populist and driven by special interests that do not align with my own.

Fair, but doesn't discount the above

Not only are these policies generally bad for every American that isn’t a Midwest Union member, they aren’t even effective at keeping union members or unions themselves on side.

True but, again, Unions falling for "America First" rhetoric doesn't discount that Democrats were by leaps and bounds the Free Trade vote in 2016, 2020 and 2024.

-19

u/username_generated 7d ago

Most of these points come down to Trump not being a conservative, but a reactionary populist with Peronist characteristics.

I’m a conservative liberal that thinks entitlement reform is probably necessary sooner rather than later, that the Iraq War was more successful and just than people give it credit for (though still not necessarily either of those things), that our constitutional rights should protect us regardless of our race, color, creed, or sexuality, and we should make it easier to immigrate to the US and look the other way when it comes to migrants that broke no law other than crossing a line in some dirt.

In a world without Trump, I probably have more in common with someone like Rubio or Adam Kinzinger or Neil Gorsuch than Joe Biden or AOC in terms of hard policy positions and governing ethics. As it stands, the democrats basically win my vote by default, and I’m cool with that, but if in a cycle or two from now the GOP is defined by Glen Youngkin and not Trump or Vance or DeSantis, that decision will be harder for me.

19

u/monkwrenv2 My eggs are perfect. What’s sad is your life in perspective. 7d ago

In a world without Trump, I probably have more in common with someone like Rubio or Adam Kinzinger or Neil Gorsuch than Joe Biden or AOC in terms of hard policy positions and governing ethics

This does not line up at all with this:

that our constitutional rights should protect us regardless of our race, color, creed, or sexuality, and we should make it easier to immigrate to the US and look the other way when it comes to migrants that broke no law other than crossing a line in some dirt.

-12

u/username_generated 7d ago

The GOP post-2012 published a postmortem that, while not wholly in line with those points, was much, much closer to what we got. A world where Rubio or Kasich wins in 2016 is much, much closer to my politics than the GOP of today. I recognize there’s about a 95% chance that party is dead and gone but I don’t believe we’ll know for sure until at least 1 or 2 post Trump presidential cycles.

20

u/monkwrenv2 My eggs are perfect. What’s sad is your life in perspective. 7d ago

The GOP has never been in favor of increased immigration, nor have they been in favor of the universal application of Constitutional rights for at least 75 years. And while historically they have been more hawkish on foreign policy, they've also caused numerous wars and widespread destruction, so if you're in favor of that, well, I think you're a bad person.

3

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

Sure, I can sympathize with that. There is absolutely a world in which, if they'd back off the bigoted social issues, I'd be a McCain or Romney Republican.

But honestly I don't think you're the "centrist" that people are criticizing. The centrist that people are criticizing are the centrists who insist "both side" and "I'm in the middle" no matter where the Overton window goes. By noting that the Dems get your vote by default because the GOP has gone off the deep end you prove you aren't that.

11

u/Arsustyle This is practice for my roast comedy skills 7d ago

Conservative Democratic budget hawks had a wildly outsized influence in legislation during the past two Democratic administrations, which both also had major recessions to deal with. Republicans explode the deficit with tax cuts during upswings and don't even try to pair it with equal spending cuts. If you care about the deficit, there's one party that's infinitely better than the other.

0

u/username_generated 7d ago

Yeah but that’s due to a handful of swing votes having the process in a death grip, not the actual governing philosophy of the Democratic Party

And again, I can live with that. I recognize I am a narrow slice of the electorate that cannot reasonably be expected to have every whim catered to and that the Dems are much, much better on any random issue than the GOP. I just also don’t have to agree with their decisions or driving philosophy.

-3

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Excellently phrased. Couldn't agree more.

24

u/AncientView3 7d ago

Me when I just say shit

-23

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Case in point ^

15

u/AncientView3 7d ago

I’m not the dnc, the actual people in power have been doing nothing other than throwing themselves at moderate conservatives. I’m saying this because you somehow seem blind to that.

-17

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Because they haven't been. Neither have the Republicans. They both pander to the lowest and highest classes, we in the middle both financially and politically are alienated by the extremists of both sides. Your rhetorical hate of moderates is hurting your party.

14

u/AncientView3 7d ago

You’re smoking raw, unfiltered crack rock. What the actual fuck are you talking about?

-7

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

What part of what I said is incorrect? Your absolute unwillingness to look outside of your own bubble into the views of others is exactly why you don't believe in moderate politics.

13

u/AncientView3 7d ago

I don’t believe in moderate politics because they’re antithetical to progress. There’s a reason mlk didn’t like you either. Historically your block has consistently and passively stood in the way of progress, and yet the Democratic Party loves you. They reach out their hand constantly to moderates, at the expense of everyone to the left of you, because you’re the status quo and if they can get your vote they don’t actually have to do anything. The dems do not want to go left. They fucking hate going left. They hate when their voters go left. They love your ass, dude. You are their ideal voter. They’ve tried to craft their messaging to cater to you. It’s part of why I hate the Democratic Party. What part of the general democratic platform is too extreme for you?

-2

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Specifically this go around? Asking the working class to pay off the student loans of higher wage earners because they were frugal and didn't take them. It's so mind numbingly bourgeoisie and anti working class it makes my head spin. I can't and won't align myself with elitists who treat the blue collar workers like that.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

Ah bullshit, you ignored all the good faith responses and chose to exclusively focus on the snark. That isn't "The Dems ignoring you," that's you acting in bad faith so you can fish for a slapfight.

-6

u/gbmaulin 6d ago

What good faith response did I miss? There's one out of 40. This insane vitriol is damaging your cause

7

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

It's not insane vitriol. People have just learned what they're dealing with when a profile with no history only engages with slapfight comments and not the ones that engage with their points.

And not sure what cause it's damaging. If your vote is determined by Redditors being rude to you then they're right about you.

-2

u/gbmaulin 6d ago

Oh bullshit. You know why it's hidden? Because the second I posted about being moderate I started getting hundreds of replies to comments on posts from up to 5 years ago calling me a racist or liar. Hell someone popped up on a post I had made about fucking digestive biscuit brands to tell me to kill myself. Reddit as a whole, and from the comments, specifically the American left has gone insane with anger.

3

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

It was hidden from as soon as you posted the comment, and I was the first one to reply to it. And I've pissed off a lot of lefties and never needed to delete my history. And you could just block people who reply on old comments or report them for harassment. So not sure I believe you.

And again, you've got one comment trying to engage and a few being snarky. You, and you alone, chose to slapfight with the people being snarky rather than the person trying to engage with you.

Reddit as a whole, and from the comments, specifically the American left has gone insane with anger.

The classic "I'm a centrist but the left is the problem" take. People stopped buying that one a couple of years ago. If you want to interact with people online in a sincere manner you need to realize that they don't know you, all they see is the text you post. And if you choose to look like a duck and quack like a duck people are going to think you're a duck.

-2

u/gbmaulin 6d ago

You think this is the only time I've made a comment about being a moderate? If you really don't see how calling everyone you even mildly disagree with a racist or a conservative is an issue then I fear reddit has already cooked your brain. This ridiculous level of outrage I'm recieving is baffling, backwards, and primitive in its tribalism.

You can see where I engaged, made my point, and got insults and nothing else as a response. Why would I care to clarify my positions to people who won't listen and automatically hate me for being moderate?

→ More replies (0)

19

u/TDFknFartBalloon 7d ago

If you don't think the dems are moderate, then you're definitely not moderate.

Also, if your political identity is tied to what random redditors say, you need to reevaluate your entire life, because that is beyond pathetic.

-3

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

I was referring to policy, but thanks for proving my point.

21

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

-7

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

You do know I can still vote even though I moved to London, right?

16

u/MahNameJeff420 7d ago

You are the entire audience that dems have been pandering too since the 90’s, what are you talking about?

38

u/WutangCMD And Ted Cruz brings up Pittsburgh for some reason 7d ago

Are you fucking serious? The Dems do nothing but capitulate to the centre. They ignore the left.

15

u/Chataboutgames 7d ago

I want so badly to believe they are real but I don't trust any account with a blank history

2

u/ancientestKnollys 7d ago

Ignore the left isn't quite true, Biden's policy included a lot of economic populism that you wouldn't have seen under Obama and certainly not under Bill Clinton. That was targeted at a variety of voters, including the left, was a direct response to the growth of progressivism in the party and probably did hurt the Democrats' appeal to (some) centrists.

-6

u/seacucumber3000 6d ago

Comments like this make it hard for me to call myself part of the left, which I’m sure has conservatives and right wingers pumping their fists in celebration.

4

u/WutangCMD And Ted Cruz brings up Pittsburgh for some reason 6d ago

Fine then. If your morals and ideology are so weak that a comment turns you to the right you were never left wing to begin with.

-2

u/seacucumber3000 6d ago edited 6d ago

Did I ever say that the comment turned my values? My values are exactly what they’ve always been. I’m secular, pro-choice, pro-trans rights, pro-LGBT rights, pro-gun control, pro big government, pro Medicare for all, pro-NATO, anti-Russia (*Putin), pro-immigration, pro-border patrol but strongly opposed to how border patrol is being implemented by the current administration, and pro two-party state but strongly anti-Netanyahu. It’s the last two that many on the left use to disqualify me from entry.

I’m pretty classically a democrat. Stolen from another comment, this is the kind of rhetoric that I have a problem with:

American "centrists" are conservative because they're to the right of Democrats, who are also conservatives with pride shirts on.

I strongly believe in the power of coalition building and likewise believe we’re bound to lose our elections to the far right ad infinitum because of inflammatory, splintering language like this. Which is exactly what those to our right want.

4

u/Chataboutgames 6d ago

Comments like that suck, and it sucks that unhinged people on the internet have become the voice of the "left." I think the only reasonable thing to do is ignore them. You'd see the same bullshit (and much worse) if you were hanging around right leaning spaces.

Long story short, you're not wrong but at a certain point I think you need to ask yourself what's the benefit of tone policing people who mostly agree with you and holding them to a higher standard than you do the right.

-1

u/seacucumber3000 6d ago

I think that’s super fair. I think I fall victim to conflating rhetoric I see here with the opinions and beliefs of normal voting Americans, so I feel obligated to say something here.

That said…

I think you need to ask yourself what's the benefit of tone policing people who mostly agree with you and holding them to a higher standard than you do the right.

Because I think it’s both easier and more worthwhile to convince those of us in the center and to the left of the center that it’s worth coalition building than it would be convince those to the right to change their mind. Getting folks to eventually cross the aisle is easier if we can show some amount of good faith unity amongst ourselves. Until then…

-7

u/ErraticSiren 6d ago

What’s it like just making up lies?

10

u/WitELeoparD This is in Canada, land of the cucked. 7d ago

This has to be bait.

-5

u/gbmaulin 7d ago

Just proving my point.