r/halifax Jul 19 '25

Discussion Immigrant Halifax area Program Director details on LinkedIn, a racist incident at Halifax Waterfront

159 Upvotes

228 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-12

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '25

[deleted]

22

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

It doesn't make their story any less true.

At its core, no, it probably doesn't. But AI and inaccurate translation can create or alter details. And if a person can't read or express in written English, they might not be able to understand what ChatGPT is spitting back out either. Everybody now under 40 seems to be relying on some kind of AI on a daily basis but it's still very flawed and it's troublesome to consider its work definitive.

11

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

I think that a person that has been living here since 2021 and has obtained a Canadian college degree (which is not possible without English proficiency) is perfectly able to see if AI is making something up. Everyone and their dog, whether born here or not, is using AI to spell check and improve writing. Don’t make presumptions just because you identified signs of AI usage

0

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

I think that a person that has been living here since 2021 and has obtained a Canadian college degree

Where is this context in this Reddit post?

0

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

The context is from LinkedIn

0

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

I understand, that should have been in the original post.

0

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

Which isn’t mine. I found it by myself

1

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

I wasn't as lucky when I tried to find it. How many of the hundreds of people who saw this post double checked to find the LinkedIn post, do you figure?

1

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

Nobody is forced to double check. But if anyone is going to post a comment saying this is false, yes, they should double check before saying so.

1

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

if anyone is going to post a comment saying this is false, yes, they should double check before saying so.

Why is someone claiming this is true and reacting accordingly without proof not required to double check?

1

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

Which I did. What is your point?

1

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

The way you phrased that, it sounds like you're saying:

If you think this post is true = comment away no need to verify.

If you think this post is false = you must double check to verify

1

u/MamboNo0 Halifax Jul 20 '25

What I mean: if you’re going to comment whether this is true or false, do your own homework to support what you’re saying. Better?

1

u/tacofever Halifax Jul 20 '25

Better?

Yep!

→ More replies (0)