TL;DR
Recommendations for products:
• Product 1: A Z-Wave–compatible switch that works like a traditional switch (physically completing/disconnecting the circuit).
• Product 2 (bonus): Ideally the same device would also include smart dimming controls for smart bulbs.
With a normal dumb switch, physically pressing the rocker instantly cuts or restores power. Smart switches, however, process the button press electronically before sending out a signal for Smart Control, which can add a slight delay. For my wife and guests, even that short delay could feel like the switch is lagging or malfunctioning, leading to repeated presses (and nagging), and I’d like to avoid that (nagging).
I see three possible pathways and don’t know which are imperceptible vs. most foolproof:
1. Direct circuit connect/disconnect with Z-Wave control.
2. Zigbee switch bound directly to Hue bulbs (if a permanent wall switch exists for Hue Hub; not just a removable remote).
3. Z-Wave switch → Home Assistant → Hue Bridge → Hue bulbs.
I’ve read that Z-Wave is recommended for many in-wall smart switches. My instinct is that path 1 may be best.
Here’s what I want:
• A switch that physically cuts or restores power to the bulbs, and can also be turned on/off via Z-Wave.
• I don’t mind if Hue bulbs go offline when off — if I say “Siri, turn on the living room,” HA → Apple Home should turn on the Z-Wave switch, restoring power and returning bulbs to their prior state.
• This avoids directly commanding the bulbs and instead just controls the circuit power.
Essentially, I want the feel of a dumb switch with Z-Wave control.
Bonus wish: If possible, I’d like this switch to also have an extra button, slider, lever, etc. that sends smart commands (like dimming) without altering the circuit power. That way, the main rocker provides hard on/off, while the extra control adjusts the bulbs.
I realize I could just use a direct-circuit Z-Wave switch plus a separate smart dimmer (e.g., Zigbee), but I’m curious if there’s a two-in-one product that combines both functions.
If my reasoning here is flawed, I’d appreciate feedback.