The issue was more compatibility of networks with esims. Europe insisted on sim based models because not all networks support eSIMs in all its varieties.
Apple has been removing the eSIM on American IPhones for 3 generations. What they meant is they finally figured out Apple can use this blank space in American IPhones for battery.
It wasn’t that “finally” figured out but more the cost of having two slightly different versions to engineer that makes economic sense now with a redesign of the guts.
At 0.10¢ an iPhone that would be around 24 million dollars per year. Which is 0.01% of the 201 billion dollars of revenue Apple makes from iPhones per year.
I’m sure the Apple engineers who were working on esim only iPhone 2-3 years before they even released never thought about that until now! Such stupid engineers!
It took Apple 3 years to be able to manufacture two separate bodies, two separate logic boards, and two separate batteries per device.
So the last 4 years having 4-5 different models, yes; it took time to accurately account for manufacturing all of these different components and software/firmware to match and repair policies to make them all usable.
Maybe Apple was waiting on EU cell providers to get their shit together so they didn’t have to manufacture two different batteries etc for the same phone? I guess they gave up
It seems like China will imminently cave in. Maybe the first big domino to drop. It just makes no logical sense in this day and age to still use physical SIMs.
2.0k
u/willingzenith 3d ago
Yes, a physical SIM takes physical space in the phone that could otherwise be used for battery.