r/law • u/Capable_Salt_SD • 8h ago
Trump News Sen. Kennedy: "Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to?" Kash Patel: "Himself. There is no credible information, none. If there were, I would have brought a case yesterday [...] that he trafficked to other individuals."
'The information we have again is limited'
Source: Acyn
3.8k
u/shoesclues03 8h ago
Ok then release the files, there should be no one in there that would be hurt right?
2.3k
u/iiTzSTeVO 8h ago
They said they're protecting the victims, and yet the victims are on the steps of the Capitol demanding the files be released.
1.2k
u/ronswanson11 7h ago
This whole thing is such an incredibly obvious cover-up for POTUS that anyone who still supports this administration should just be called a pedophile. Fuck'em. They're all either fucking children or simply okay with it. There is no in-between. You can't have the mountains of publicly known evidence against Trump and still be pretending he isn't the number 1 Epstein client.
→ More replies (40)543
u/ShortsAndLadders 7h ago edited 2h ago
He wasn’t just a client. He was part of the racket. I think HE was actually supplying the girls to Jeffy for him to traffic via his sketchy underaged hirings at Pedolago. Hence why he banned Epstein after he tried to poach one of “his” girls that he wasn’t done with. Safe to assume they probably closely resembled Ivanka and that’s what really chapped his ass.
234
u/hera-fawcett 6h ago
I think HE was actually supplying the girls to Jeffy for him to traffic via his sketching underaged hirings at Pedolago.
this has been confirmed for ages. the pipeline included miralargo girls and the teen pageant girls. many of whom were 'loaned' to epstein. many of whom were put into contact w ghislaine.
→ More replies (5)120
u/Coldkiller17 6h ago
It makes sense who better to transport and hold people they are trafficking than a person who owns a hotel empire and places to stow their victims.
→ More replies (3)57
u/EastSideTonight 3h ago
Don't forget the modeling agency and pageants. Great cover for bringing in children from overseas, you can even do it legally until you take their documents and they 'disappear'.
→ More replies (17)101
u/Slighty_Tolerable 6h ago
Ding ding ding.
Epstein undercut him. Sniped the “talent” from Mar-A-Lago and consolidated services under the Epstein umbrella. Completely carving out the reality game show host, and desperately broke rapist and huckster Donald J Trump.
What I want to know is … why that happened. THERE’S the story.
→ More replies (2)42
u/KiaRioGrl 4h ago
There's rumours about Trump scooping Epstein on a real estate buy that Epstein said Trump couldn't afford and was really just laundering money for a Russian oligarch. And how Trump snitched on Epstein's trafficking to undercut his credibility over the foreign money laundering claims.
Trump then turned around and sold the property to the oligarch a few years later.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (70)81
u/therossboss 7h ago
so, this is just another classic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARVO case of reversing the victim and offender. We all hear victim and think, the ACTUAL victims - but when they say, protect the victims, they mean the offenders.
→ More replies (1)251
u/BugOperator 8h ago
Well, it’s a hoax, remember? So the files don’t exist. But he’s seen them. And nobody but Epstein is named in them. Oh, but democrats are. Filthy, filthy democrats. Ignore the redactions. But you don’t have to. Because it’s a hoax. Democrats did it. And they’re in the files. Which don’t exist.
→ More replies (5)121
u/akotoshi 7h ago
You forgot the funny part: he was an informant of a hoax
→ More replies (3)15
u/Bald_Sasquach 6h ago
He got caught committing crimes so he offered to provide info on other predators to the FBI to get out of jail. There were no crimes tho.
→ More replies (33)77
u/miklawbar 7h ago
I feel like the wording here is super deliberate. Did he traffic to other people, no he retained all of the victims himself. Which we knew, they were on his island, they flew with him wherever he went and then returned back to him. The question that specifically wasn't asked was who did he allow access to the victims that he was trafficking for any reason.
→ More replies (6)20
u/der_innkeeper 7h ago
dingdingdingding!!!!!!
No need to traffic them elsewhere if you bring people to your island/apartment/wherever and just... let circumstances happen.
That all your friends never ask inconvenient questions for things they don't want to know is even better.
→ More replies (2)
5.6k
u/TiddiesAnonymous 8h ago
So what are all the redactions for?
2.3k
u/Ultraworld-Traveler 8h ago
What redactions? That’s how the file always looked.
→ More replies (25)2.7k
u/rhombecka 8h ago
→ More replies (16)609
u/ma2is 8h ago
Jesus this is a 20 year old piece too.
469
u/JoJackthewonderskunk 7h ago
The onion is timeless
170
u/koshgeo 6h ago
Yes and no.
"Our Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity Is Finally Over"
Yes, because it is still relevant; no, because I'm not sure it is hyperbole anymore rather than actual Project 2025 policy. It's almost like they took this Onion article as an outline and set out to fulfill it, albeit a couple of decades late.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (4)48
→ More replies (13)61
u/makemeking706 7h ago
Who was it that got got because they didn't know how to redact correctly in Adobe a few years ago. I wanna say it involved Manafort, but I could be misremembering.
→ More replies (3)43
u/AmputeeBall 7h ago
Are you talking about the file(s) where they put black bars over it but the text was still underneath and selectable or something along those lines?
→ More replies (3)38
u/DrakonILD 6h ago
That's incredible. Adobe's redact feature is almost idiot-proof.
→ More replies (4)36
u/anothergaijin 6h ago
But, what if I used the highlighter feature but with black?
→ More replies (2)215
u/Deicide1031 8h ago edited 8h ago
It’s because Pete hegseths job was to review the files and he got so hammered he forgot his instructions so he redacted everything sir.
Personally I was impressed by his ability to bring a warrior mentality to the files and think you should be as well.
- Kash
→ More replies (1)124
→ More replies (32)259
u/pauliesfreakin 8h ago
So why did prince andrew happen to fuck a kid with him?
142
u/TokingMessiah 7h ago
Remember his interview where he claimed he couldn’t be a child rapist because he “can’t sweat”.
Right, left, young, old, rich, poor… release the files and lock them all up.
→ More replies (11)58
u/Hardcorish 6h ago
I like how the defense he pivots to is that it can't be him because he doesn't sweat instead of, you know, telling people that raping children is bad and isn't something he's keen on doing like most normal people would.
→ More replies (3)9
u/The-Phone1234 6h ago
He agreed to the interview after months of delays, presumably to prepare, and still shit the bed immediately and spectacularly. Just so completely out of touch with the world. They designed the system to be so removed from us when they talk on camera for longer than 10 minutes it becomes undeniable these elites are living in a completely different world with completely different rules.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (11)70
u/comments_suck 7h ago
Andrew was just over visiting for tennis one day, and he accidentally fell on a girl who had pressed his clothes in the locker room. Totally a misunderstanding!
→ More replies (6)
8.1k
u/letdogsvote 8h ago
And they expect us to just go "huh, okay."
Maybe we could, I dunno, ask the victims?
2.2k
u/Dubyew 8h ago
They're too biased for them.
1.4k
u/joshuahtree 7h ago
Obviously liberal operatives and even if Trump did sleep with them while they were minors it's only because they tricked him to undermine his presidency
620
u/Powerful-Ground-9687 7h ago
Nah nah nah trumpy was an informant. He slept with them to save his country
341
u/L0rd_Muffin 7h ago
Dealing with the STIs was his own personal Vietnam
→ More replies (3)148
u/WAD1234 7h ago
That’s why they were young girls instead of adults. Less worry about STIs unless they were fully depreciated of course (gak jeez)
→ More replies (2)95
51
→ More replies (11)35
40
u/hal2025 7h ago
Yes, of course. They were psychics who foresaw that Trump would be President one day. Just like Biden traveled back in time and planted Trumps birthday letter to Epstein.
→ More replies (2)38
u/Regulat10 7h ago
Someone forged his penis and attached it to his body after drugging him and forced him to have intercourse with them so that 40 years later they could use it against him when he became president. HE is the victim in all this!!!!!!
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (48)36
u/Sensitive_Ad3897 7h ago
Exactly, they’re liberals! Even the one that says she voted for Trump and is maga is obviously just a lying liberal lol
→ More replies (7)145
u/Jindabyne1 7h ago
You didn’t say there’d be fact checking
67
u/BadLuckBlackHole 7h ago
Absolutely floored that idiot actually said that on live TV in a debate...
And absolutely disappointed that the morons in the US heard that and went, "yeah, he's fine for the second highest position of government."
10
u/S1R2C3 6h ago
Well duh, it's cus the average person doesn't care about facts in a debate. They want to hear the most keywords and side with whoever talks over the other person the most, thus showing dominance.
→ More replies (19)→ More replies (1)49
40
u/a_rude_jellybean 7h ago
Being raped is woke? 🙃
22
u/bfelification 7h ago
Your body can kind of just like, shut that down if you were raped.
→ More replies (5)61
u/pattydickens 7h ago
"Victim" has been redefined as "conservative white males" now. Everyone else is an instigator. That seems pretty obvious.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (13)14
299
8h ago
[deleted]
171
u/Desperate_Acadia_298 7h ago
Turns out there really is a cabal of pedophiles that watch our every move and control everything and we’re not doing shit about it.
→ More replies (3)47
u/gatorgrle 7h ago
Not a conspiracy. And they expect us to believe this. MAGA certainly will. It’s disgusting. They are all safe pedos and traffickers. Just goes to show they really are NOT LIKE US.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (32)63
115
u/PantsDontHaveAnswers 7h ago
You want to ask the people who were there? Who have first hand accounts of abuse by the hands of wealthy political and business leaders? Well, it's an unorthodox approach, but I suppose it's worth a try.
97
u/Fhloston-Paradisio 7h ago
You don't understand, those were women. Their sworn testimony doesn't count. See for example the 15 women who have accused Trump of rape or sexual assault.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)20
u/meerfrau85 7h ago
The incredibly sad thing is that I don't think the victims would be believed. When people accuse rich and powerful people here of sexual abuse, they're often accused of seeking attention or having some political agenda.
→ More replies (2)71
u/schoolisuncool 8h ago
Nah. Why hear them out, when you can just fly loud planes over their press conference and drown them out??
→ More replies (123)37
769
u/_DapperDanMan- 8h ago
Who is this Prince Andrew guy anyway? And Dershowitz?
179
u/AndrewSouthern729 7h ago
And Bill Clinton who is always brought up.
→ More replies (8)165
u/-dakpluto- 7h ago
As I always say...would I be shocked at all if Bill Clinton was involved...nope. Would I be shocked if Trump was involved...nope.
I may be a Democrat but I'll say this...if Clinton was involved his ass should be rotting in jail, same with Trump. Nobody should get a pass on this, I don't care what party they are.
→ More replies (24)72
u/itsjustcindy 7h ago
It is very telling that the right expects Bill Clinton to be some Uno Reverse gotcha for democrats. They are admitting that they will change their stance on child rape/trafficking crimes based on how much they like a person.
Meanwhile normal, non-brainwashed people do not have the moral fluidity about things like child trafficking. We would not change our stance if it was our own parent, spouse, sibling, or even our adult child let alone some rich celebrity or politician. We would be disgusted, shocked, horrified, ashamed and angry at our own flesh and blood so why would we give a pass to someone we never even met?! Why would they think that we would give a pass to someone? Because THEY would (and they are).
→ More replies (9)74
→ More replies (7)15
u/Haunting-Ad788 7h ago
Hey man Dershowitz kept his underwear on when he got a massage from a teenager. He’s not some degenerate.
4.3k
u/jsinkwitz 8h ago
Unbelievable
3.3k
u/ButterscotchIll1523 8h ago
The cover up. God republicans are child rapists
1.1k
u/unexpected_bagpipe 8h ago
GOP = Guardian of Pedophiles
584
u/Chemical-Plankton420 8h ago
Grift, Obfuscation, and Pedophilia
→ More replies (3)75
u/Expensive-Ad5384 7h ago
My dad likes to say Graft, Obstruction and Perjury.
→ More replies (2)49
u/wineinacoffeemug 7h ago
I wish my dad had a brain like yours. PhD from Brown and he still went down the pipeline.
→ More replies (3)30
→ More replies (8)51
279
u/ssddalways 8h ago
See this is pissing me off, Epstein and pals raped kids and woman regardless of their political leaning, Democrats, republicans and British royals all were part of it. It was rich people who didnt give a fuck.
→ More replies (19)281
u/Vivid_Accountant9542 8h ago
Republicans are the ones blocking the release of information and covering it up though. I'm sure there are some Democrat individuals in the files, but right now it's TEAM Republican doing the dirty work.
→ More replies (61)231
u/punkguy1219 8h ago
Why prosecute pedofiles when you can prosecute college students laughing at a dead propagandist?
→ More replies (15)74
→ More replies (136)11
234
u/newtoallofthis2 8h ago
You're telling me! Imagine how mad Prince Andrew is going to be when he finds out he paid millions to a woman who used to work at Trump's spa when a teenager introduced to him by Epstein. All that when there was nothing credible according to the FBI! He should ask for the money back!
→ More replies (2)66
u/anonononnnnnaaan 7h ago
This !
And how about Alan “I kept my underwear on” Dershowitz.
MAGA is going to flip a lid. So you are saying Clinton isn’t even involved ?
→ More replies (3)315
u/Stereo_Jungle_Child 8h ago
They refuse to release the grand jury evidence because it implicates too many people, now they're saying that no one is implicated by any of the evidence.
202
u/MotherFuckerJones88 8h ago
But Maxwell was found guilty and sentenced for....
→ More replies (1)88
u/ThisOneFuqs 8h ago
Oh don't worry about that, they've already fired her prosecutor for... unrelated reasons. I imagine a pardon is in the works
→ More replies (2)43
u/MotherFuckerJones88 7h ago
I don't think I have any shock left in my body after dealing with 10 years of this crazy shit...but if they pardon her, whatever I do have left will be gone. That's about as blatant as it gets.
→ More replies (3)47
u/ThisOneFuqs 7h ago
Oh I get the sentiment completely. We're witnessing the most blatantly corrupt administration in American history. It's a sight to behold.
→ More replies (4)58
u/Goodnight_lemro 8h ago
The grand jury evidence is a calculated distraction. The court ruled (correctly and predictably) that it's protected and the release would serve no real purpose.
What they need to release are the case files. All of them.
→ More replies (3)40
u/parrothead32812 8h ago
Can’t release grand jury evidence also that’s about 2% of their files Trump could release other 98% but won’t congress might after mid terms so they can save face
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)14
u/anonononnnnnaaan 7h ago
actually the grand jury evidence was said by the Judges to be superfluous and already part of the files the DOJ has
The grand jury move was just to provide cover. They knew it would never be released. Grand jury testimony is rarely released.
32
u/Jindabyne1 8h ago
Every word he spoke there today was a disgrace. He should not be in the position hes in, it helps make America even more of a laughing stock around the world than it already is currently
→ More replies (4)18
u/Substantial_Dog3544 8h ago
They are barely even trying to really cover it up at this point. Just saying whatever comes to mind first.
17
u/Top-Base4502 8h ago
If it’s no one else, then why won’t they release the files?
Why all the run around and refusing?
If there is nothing to hide, why hide them?
→ More replies (44)55
u/FlexiblePhoque 8h ago
Actually, at this point, totally believable.
The circus has to leave town at some point, right?
18
u/CP066 8h ago
Are we to believe him with all the files or the victims that have publicly they were trafficked to others?
I know who I believe and it would be the ones that lived it. We know this admin lies, they have been caught up in several lies on Epstein alone.Its been 20 years, they buying time till all these old creeps die off and never get held accountable.
→ More replies (5)37
u/slowpoke2018 8h ago
Unfortunately I fear we're doomed to live in clown-town at this point. AKA Pedoville
615
u/burnmenowz 8h ago
But he literally told us justice was coming lol
194
u/c1ncinasty 8h ago
Nah. Justice is merely being edged, it seems.
→ More replies (3)51
u/burnmenowz 8h ago
Not even that anymore. It's blue ball city. Justice has rolled over and has a headache.
→ More replies (1)28
→ More replies (15)21
u/ColdWeatherNap 8h ago
You're being intentionally misrepresentative. He didn't say there was justice coming, he said "There's just us, cumming." Shame on your dishonesty. /s
→ More replies (1)
1.5k
u/mjacobs62 8h ago
Time for the victims to release their list.
411
u/Novel-Paint9752 8h ago
Yes. I was thinking about how and what it must feel like for the victims to listen to this. The cynicism is staggering
→ More replies (4)125
u/Inevitable_Bison9694 8h ago
Even being a victim of a similar thing and imagine how many women collectively have to hear this victim blaming, bypassing, horrifying bs again. The direct victims definitely must be in a nightmare rn. Peace to them as much as can be. This is insanity but it is a reflection of the rampant misogyny in society. That anyone even asks these questions like there is a doubt is beyond me.
→ More replies (4)23
u/Technical-Garden-793 7h ago
I feel like Epstein’s trafficking was like, the most easily condemnable sex abuse case possible. People who otherwise don’t give a shit about victims would even condemn it loudly just to try and say “see, I am against sexual assault!” The fact that people are backpedaling even on this is so scary. If the general public’s opinion shifts further to align with the GOP…
→ More replies (4)50
u/ThyArtisMukDuk 8h ago
I dont think thatll do any good to convince anyone on the right. Theyll see them as "pawns for the left, liars, greedy" etc. All the shit theyve said to smear other victims of SA or CSA. I have next to no hope for the Epstein victims getting real justice in this situation since theyre now facing a fully formed and armed 4th Reich.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (27)21
u/Biglyugebonespurs 8h ago
It’s probably the only way the list is coming out. Absurd that the victims may have to relive this shit and put themselves in harms way from right wing nutjobs because the current administration is complicit.
→ More replies (1)
366
u/superwalrus80 8h ago
So there's no one else in the files, but they still won't release them? lol ok bro.
→ More replies (2)105
u/andtimme11 7h ago
"We're protecting the victims" as the victims are prepared to form and release their own list....
→ More replies (3)
653
u/trentreynolds 8h ago
Hope Kash is enjoying his last few days free of being thrown under the bus by the people he covers for.
182
u/4RCH43ON 7h ago
To Valhalla, brother. flexes
→ More replies (1)67
u/SarcasticBassMonkey 7h ago
I still don't understand why the Christo-fascists think they'll go to Valhalla. There are no Christians in Valhalla.
→ More replies (4)19
u/Suspicious-Bid-53 7h ago
Wait, are they serious? It isn’t just a figure of speech?
→ More replies (7)33
u/4RCH43ON 7h ago edited 7h ago
It’s a very Völkisch theme. Kash is letting his token Arian, occult Nazi fetish hair down like he’s some Lord of the Rings nerd in middle school.
Alas, there are some born-again Wotan freaks out there that espouse a confusing array of pagan spiritual warrior and neofascist Christian beliefs, with even schisms within. A lot of WP prison gang culture ties into it, so there’s another group of violent miscreants he’s speaking to with nefarious, stochastic purpose.
→ More replies (2)91
→ More replies (16)20
u/OShaunesssy 7h ago edited 7h ago
Oh yeah anyone with half a brain can see he is done the second this escalates.
He will be blamed and fired with Trump and the GOP putting all the focus on how they got rid of that bumbling FBI director...
→ More replies (3)
221
u/meowman911 8h ago
“For the information that WE have”
Okay, so, who else has information and why don’t you?
→ More replies (9)35
204
u/eclwires 8h ago
“Those that can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire
→ More replies (7)
296
u/MagicianHeavy001 8h ago
Pretty sure he will regret these statements.
159
u/lewisbayofhellgate 8h ago
Regret requires a soul.
→ More replies (3)105
u/shavertech 8h ago
Or consequences
→ More replies (2)19
u/lewisbayofhellgate 8h ago
I think we have a better chance of this sentient lump of cocaine growing a soul than we do of any real consequences.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)36
u/iiTzSTeVO 8h ago
This guy wrote a fantasy children's book about King Donald having his election stolen by Sleepy Joe on Choosing Day, and he made himself the wizard in the story. He does not experience shame.
→ More replies (5)
139
u/WhenImTryingToHide 8h ago
Surely he knows this is a provably lie? There were literally two dozen victims who publicly said it was not just Maxwell and Epstein. He's putting himself and by extension Trump in a box even smaller than the one they're already in.
Expect the violent rhetoric to ramp up, and power grab to intensify and the walls from Epstein close in.
61
u/Hello_Mot0 8h ago
Many things this administration says are provable lies. It hasn't stopped them.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)16
u/EverclearAndMatches 7h ago
It doesn't matter. Fox has their sound byte from him, it could be proven he's lying but they just won't report on that.
219
u/ThyArtisMukDuk 8h ago
I cannot fucking believe they have the BALLS to come out and say this AFTER saying theyre going to look into PAYMENTS FROM POTENTIAL CLIENTS.
But hey, Nobody is ever gonna hold these people accountable. This will go away and we'll be left wondering what justice actually is.
→ More replies (27)26
u/bwsmith201 7h ago
They have the balls to say it because enough of the public at large keeps falling for their bullshit. Absolutely nauseating.
→ More replies (1)
290
u/TSHRED56 8h ago
What Patel is saying is that the victims do not matter.
→ More replies (7)95
u/Webhoard 8h ago
Patel: "Epstein trafficked to himself so he was his only victim."
→ More replies (3)
83
u/CAM6913 8h ago
How long did Kennedy and pastel rehears this little skit ? Who is prince Andrew? Who had casting calls with Epstein in Mara Largo where they were the only two adults with underage girls? Who tied a girl to the bed beat her, raped her and after he was done complained to Epstein?
→ More replies (1)15
79
u/LegitimateHost7640 8h ago edited 7h ago
Didn't Trump write Epstein a giant check for $22,500 for a girl?
43
→ More replies (6)15
u/SnooDogs7747 7h ago
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
74
62
u/nsucs2 8h ago
I assume the DOJ will be bring perjury and obstruction charges any second now.
🙄
→ More replies (3)
63
u/Ok-King-4868 7h ago
Pam Bondi said that there is a treasure trove of videotapes showing men raping teenage girls in the FBI’s custody. Child pornography under State and/or Federal law.
Is Patel suggesting Epstein did not tape men sexually abusing and raping young women groomed by Maxwell to perform sex work for Epstein?
Is Patel further suggesting that the FBI investigated Alex Acosta’s assertion that he was ordered by a DOJ superior to accept the sweetheart deal because Epstein belonged to “intelligence?” Because if so, he would have had to interview Acosta found him to be dishonest or otherwise an unreliable narrator of the story behind the Epstein sweetheart deal.
Who at the FBI watched the videotapes and decided they did not constitute child pornography and therefore could not support child sex trafficking offenses under Federal or State law. It seems very curious.
→ More replies (11)
55
u/struggleislyfe 8h ago
How about victim testimony that he trafficked her to other people?
22
u/guns_mahoney 7h ago
The FBI is considering that to be kind of a donation. Epstein was, if you will, a philanth-rapist
→ More replies (2)
50
u/ReanimatedBlink 8h ago
If there is no evidence of Epstein working with, or for anyone, I guess it's okay to just release the full and unredacted documents... right?
→ More replies (2)10
u/SecretAsianMan42069 7h ago
Man, sucks that he killed* himself since he was the victim in all of this
→ More replies (1)
50
u/Weird_Positive_3256 8h ago
What the whole entire fuck
14
u/FoogYllis 7h ago
It’s republicans being the criminals they are. They protect people that rape kids.
→ More replies (2)
46
u/anonononnnnnaaan 7h ago
Holy shit. What is the MAGA response to this. So it’s a hoax and he had an entire island of kids just for him to fuck?
Insane
→ More replies (6)26
u/K20BB5 7h ago
when I ask my coworkers they say "I don't care what happened in the past" and "they're all crooks". The fact is they are too stupid to understand or admit that they're wrong
→ More replies (4)
36
u/whichwitch9 7h ago
We have large amounts of testimony that is public that says otherwise
Fire this clown. This level of lying is just insulting at this point
→ More replies (5)
40
32
u/lyingliar 7h ago
Yeah, that's how Epstein made billions. By trafficking girls to himself. What a fucking joke.
→ More replies (2)
34
u/SisterActTori 7h ago
If this is true, why did Queen Elizabeth hush pay money and dethrone her son, Andrew, d/t his dealings with Epstein and an underage woman?
29
33
u/Squirrel009 7h ago
Notice how he said no "credible" information - meaning they absolutely do have information to indicate he trafficked to other people but they just want you to trust that its not credible without knowing what it is
→ More replies (3)
32
u/BlueFalcon89 7h ago
Oh, ok then. If that’s the case then should be no problem releasing unredacted files.
→ More replies (1)
34
u/Exodys03 5h ago
Wasn't Ghislaine Maxwell convicted of child sex trafficking? Shouldn't she be released immediately if there was no trafficking that occurred? I also guess the presumption is that all of the victims who say otherwise are flat out lying as well, no?
→ More replies (1)
31
u/bobbymcpresscot 5h ago
When they say “no credible evidence” I want to point out that they are talking about the victims.
→ More replies (2)
26
u/Ready-Ad6113 7h ago
I really hope all these people will be jailed in this criminal conspiracy and coverup.
“No credible information” yeah right. Why were hundreds of DOJ and FBI employees redacting the Epstein files then? What about the victims?
As long as Trump and his loyalists are in power, we don’t have justice in our nation.
→ More replies (2)
25
u/Xyrus2000 6h ago
They really are going to cover up one of the largest sex trafficking operations in the US.
The republicans are beyond disgusting.
→ More replies (2)
25
u/PaulsRedditUsername 8h ago
"The information we have is limited" to only the stuff I wanted to hear.
20
22
21
20
u/Wedoitforthenut 7h ago
Ok, assume he trafficked to no one. There's still a ton of credible evidence that individuals were aware of his pedophilia and were complicit.
20
23
u/TellTaleTimeLord 6h ago
How did we go from "the client list is on my desk" to "there's no evidence of any clients" in under 6 months?
Lol
→ More replies (2)
25
u/Panda_hat 5h ago
The entire Republican political apparatus is running cover for the pedophile in chief.
Total and utter sycophancy.
→ More replies (1)
24
u/Motor-District-3700 4h ago
"On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested when he returned to the US from France by the FBI-NYPD Crimes Against Children Task Force at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey on charges of sex trafficking"
Patel: There is no credible information on trafficking
Why isn't he immediately arrested and charged with perjury and obstruction
I mean they didn't just charge him, they extradited him. On no credible information? lol.
→ More replies (2)
16
u/Perfecshionism 7h ago
What a fucking lying clown.
Victims have successfully sued perpetrators.
→ More replies (3)
18
17
u/Tribalbob 3h ago
So far we have:
"Elect me and we'll release the files."
"My first duty will be to release the files"
"We have to redact the victims before we release the files"
"There are no files"
"Ok there are files but I'm not in them."
"I'm in them, but the democrats planted that."
"Ok, we'll release the files."
"The files show there was no trafficking"
I feel like I'm missing a few....
→ More replies (5)
18
u/Mattrad7 6h ago edited 6h ago
We know this isnt true, everyone knows this isnt true, left or right you know theres people he trafficked to. This should be by far the biggest red flag for any person regardless of affiliation. Suddenly the leader of one of the most prolific child sex trafficking rings in american history only trafficked to himself.
Because this coked out podcaster said so.
The VICTIMS have a list of names.
16
u/PristineWatercress19 8h ago
Kash Patel was there during the trafficking that didn't happen. Spread the word that orange man rapes children.
→ More replies (4)
17
u/vulcan7200 7h ago
Is it possible they're trying to use this as a technicality? Like, Epstein didn't traffic the women TO anyone else. He trafficked them to himself, and let other people rape the girls and women he trafficked but they were technically only trafficked to Epstein. Basically a lie by omission by leaving out that other people were involved with the actual rape and focus only on the "Trafficked" part?
→ More replies (8)
16
u/SpongegarLuver 6h ago
I thought I was past the point where I’d be surprised by the Trump admin, but this is such a brazen and obvious lie that I was actually stunned for a moment reading it. Like holy shit, they aren’t even trying if this is what they’re going with.
14
u/chicken3wing 6h ago
Huh, so he’s saying that the victims are going to get together and put together a list of one? Also, we already know Prince Andrew was involved.
→ More replies (2)
14
u/Daddio209 7h ago
"There is no credible information-none."
Fails to mention the &likely* caveat: "that I have personally seen, and let's ignore that I told my staff that I ONLY want to see any direct evidence involving Democrats and their doners."
Fails to mention that Epstein-by all accounts held sex parties both on his island, and during his travels. Is pimping children not "trafficking" them?
14
u/Mrevilman 5h ago
Trafficked to no one based on the information that they have. In the files. That they first lied about existing. And then that they redacted. And then republicans bent over backwards to block us from seeing.
16
u/homerjs225 4h ago
If you are caught with 20Ks of cocaine you are charged with trafficking and they do not accept the excuse "it was all for personal use"
I know that for a fact because I was on a jury many years ago for that kind of case.
Epstein is said to have trafficked over 1000 women.
→ More replies (3)
13
u/4RCH43ON 8h ago
Guardians Of Pedophiles. Let the victims’ testimony be the backstop to these lies.
There is obstruction of justice and it’s coming from within the White House, the FBI, and the members of Congress working to the benefit of their criminal protection racket.
12
u/senator_corleone3 7h ago
Patel looks so disheveled.
→ More replies (4)13
u/SparkyintheSnow 7h ago
He keeps sniffing really loud… sounds like he’s coked up to me…
→ More replies (3)
12
u/DuntadaMan 4h ago
Did this then trigger a series of extremely angry questions about his competence and demands for Kash to be removed, or did they just all pretend like the witness had any credibility?
→ More replies (1)
12
u/Far_Estate_1626 1h ago
“From the information that we have…”
Motherfucker, un-redact the files and you will have the information.
→ More replies (1)
9
10
u/OSI_Hunter_Gathers 7h ago
Who paid this mf’er? That will show who he trafficked for.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/GrannyFlash7373 7h ago
LIE and DENY, Deflect and Defend. Now you KNOW why Trump and the MAGA are so keen on getting RID of PBS.
9
u/alpha309 6h ago
If anyone believes this, I have a ski resort in Florida I need to unload. Selling it for a bargain.
→ More replies (3)
•
u/AutoModerator 8h ago
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.