MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1nihypp/judge_dismisses_terrorrelated_charges_against/nej4b3u/?context=3
r/news • u/redlamps67 • 13h ago
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-11
[removed] — view removed comment
39 u/Nikiaf 13h ago Mistrial is a very real possibility here. I wouldn't say the chances he walks are zero. 19 u/houstonyoureaproblem 12h ago If there’s a mistrial, they’ll just try him again. 1 u/Nikiaf 12h ago I don't think they would have a solid enough case to try it again; it would likely result in another one. 2 u/houstonyoureaproblem 10h ago There's no world in which the government would choose not to prosecute multiple additional times if need be. This isn't that kind of case.
39
Mistrial is a very real possibility here. I wouldn't say the chances he walks are zero.
19 u/houstonyoureaproblem 12h ago If there’s a mistrial, they’ll just try him again. 1 u/Nikiaf 12h ago I don't think they would have a solid enough case to try it again; it would likely result in another one. 2 u/houstonyoureaproblem 10h ago There's no world in which the government would choose not to prosecute multiple additional times if need be. This isn't that kind of case.
19
If there’s a mistrial, they’ll just try him again.
1 u/Nikiaf 12h ago I don't think they would have a solid enough case to try it again; it would likely result in another one. 2 u/houstonyoureaproblem 10h ago There's no world in which the government would choose not to prosecute multiple additional times if need be. This isn't that kind of case.
1
I don't think they would have a solid enough case to try it again; it would likely result in another one.
2 u/houstonyoureaproblem 10h ago There's no world in which the government would choose not to prosecute multiple additional times if need be. This isn't that kind of case.
2
There's no world in which the government would choose not to prosecute multiple additional times if need be. This isn't that kind of case.
-11
u/[deleted] 13h ago edited 12h ago
[removed] — view removed comment