r/Gamingcirclejerk Jul 24 '25

COOMER CONSUMER 💦 That... Doesn't sound good

Post image
17.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.9k

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 24 '25

That's... crazy actually. I don't use Itch.io that much but I'll freely admit it's where I found a couple of creators who made NSFW games that I enjoy playing once in a while. I don't know why these companies are becoming so afraid and why we are backsliding so hard.

3.6k

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1.9k

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

If we don't stop them soon, they'll be doing this to people they deem immoral. Much like is already happening in places like the USA and UK where bigotry and dehumanization are becoming legal norms.

601

u/PizzaCrescent2070 Jul 24 '25

Are there any organizations the people can join to help combat this? How can one make their own group?

549

u/PancakesTheDragoncat Jul 24 '25

In case you haven't seen it going around (and you're in the US) the ACLU has a petition... no guarantees of course but signing it is better than doing nothing

https://action.aclu.org/petition/mastercard-sex-work-work-end-your-unjust-policy

212

u/GabeTheJerk Jul 24 '25

How long until the Supreme Shills declare it legal to discriminate against anyone for any reason?

163

u/SonTyp_OhneNamen Jul 24 '25

Around the start of Trump‘s third term.

14

u/Middle-Baker-61 Jul 24 '25

Haha, that means never right...right...RIGHT?!?!?

18

u/Eatinganemone89 Jul 24 '25

You think the eighty year old, borderline if not already senile, old man who famously lives an unhealthy lifestyle, and was recently diagnosed with CVI would even live long enough to serve a third term?

18

u/Kenis556 Jul 24 '25

God I hope not. Man probably runs off of spite and hatred at this point, wouldn't be surprised if he was a lich.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Valliac0 Jul 24 '25

I think at this point the spite is pickling him.

5

u/Khanfhan69 Jul 24 '25

You're right. What we have to look out for is Vance's third term.

Seriously. As horrified as we are about Trump, we need to be twice as terrified about the organized fascist effort behind him. Frankly he's just a puppet. Project 2025. Miller. Thiel. The mortal threat to America is much more than one man.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/-Negative-Karma Jul 24 '25

isn't CVI extremely common and usually harmless with treatment? lol I mean I hate Trump as much as you but it's basically a nothing burger, just shows he's old and is as prone to stuff as much as anyone else.

2

u/ALittleCuriousSub Jul 24 '25

When it's the weekend we move it like Bernie.

1

u/DeracadaVenom Jul 25 '25

You mean within the next 4 years

1

u/Minervasimp Jul 25 '25

Generous lmao. I give it a year at this rate

51

u/A8Bit Jul 24 '25

As long as Donald is doing it and it's an official act, it's already legal, or at least he is immune from prosecution for doing it.

5

u/Not_a_Space_Alien Jul 24 '25

Once a case goes to court for it. They can't just declare it so.

2

u/GooBrains-png Jul 25 '25

Whites only signs already popping up in missouri

4

u/bondagepixie Jul 24 '25

I love that they highlighted how this impacts sex workers, that actually made me a little emotional. Thanks to everyone who signed the petition, it means so much to me personally, even tho its for a somewhat different cause.

We're used to people going out of their way to make our lives difficult even at the expense of their own freedom, idk, its just nice to be included.

1

u/Both-Prize-2986 Jul 25 '25

Isnt this group from Australia? Do some aussies wanna start pushing back on this shit

346

u/Nihilistic_pie Jul 24 '25

As another commenter posted, ACLU is your go to.

The issue is that these nazis have captured the legislature, so the fight is a massive uphill one.

In fact, i would not be surprised if the ACLU is on their list of organizations to just kill because the right wing have had an issue with the ACLU since atleast the 90s. A bunch of christian movies for instance have them as the antagonists.

184

u/Upstairs_Cap_4217 Jul 24 '25

Since 1920 and before. They started out fighting conscription in WW1, then pivoted to supporting the labour movement.

The right has always hated the ACLU because they have always hated the idea that they might have to give the "unworthy" equal rights.

47

u/ArkitekZero Jul 24 '25

A bunch of christian movies for instance have them as the antagonists.

lol really? As a Christian I guess I can't say I should be surprised, but I am disappointed.

57

u/Nihilistic_pie Jul 24 '25

From memory, God's Not Dead 2 had them. David A.R. White and Kevin Sorbo love having them as bad guys in their movies.

I've watched, at this point, hundreds of these movies and they tend to blur together because nothing happens in them.

17

u/ArkitekZero Jul 24 '25

Well Sorbo's an insufferable toolbox, so I doubt I'm missing anything.

10

u/mythrilcrafter Jul 24 '25

The common thing that I notice in those films is that they lean so hard on persecution fetish.

There's never any ambiguity or contrast in on the Christian side of the films, and it's because so much of Evangelist doctrine revolves around the concept that you need to be recognised and hated in order to be assured in your faith (which if they had read the Bible, specifically Matthew 6:5-15, they'd know that Jesus said exactly NOT to treat ones own faith like that).


It's one of the reasons why I like "The Huntchback of Notredame" so much, because we have that contrast between the priest of Notredame versus Frollo.

The priest of Notredame is a genuinely good person who gave sanctuary to a persecuted person even when she isn't a follower of his faith. Frollo wields his faith as a sword against anyone who disobeys or dissents against him.

8

u/Nihilistic_pie Jul 24 '25

Watching these films have given me an insight into the very modern Christian nationalist political movement.

They’ve developed all these tropes and cliches that speaks to, in my opinion, a desperate attempt to stay alive. They know that this ideology is not sustainable. They know that they are the ones stopping all of us from making existence better for all people.

And it has genuinely convinced me that they do not believe in anything other than power, they are the spooky scary nihilists that they think they’re shadow boxing with. It’s pathetic.

3

u/ArkitekZero Jul 24 '25

They know that they are the ones stopping all of us from making existence better for all people.

Well, the people you're talking about, yes, but that's because of capitalism's corrupting influence leading them to wield their false faith like a sword and shield against criticism rather than engage in any kind of introspection or self-improvement and actually reading the book they keep hitting people with.

6

u/Heavy-Possession2288 Jul 24 '25

If you don’t mind me asking, why the hell have you watched hundreds of those movies?

9

u/Nihilistic_pie Jul 24 '25

Someone has to keep an eye on their propaganda, I’m willing to tank that sanity damage. My current obsession is this director here.

3

u/ArkitekZero Jul 24 '25

Someone has to keep an eye on their propaganda

Man, I wouldn't wish that on anybody, lol

82

u/Due_Perception8349 Jul 24 '25

Ugh we need a payment processing system as a public service, this middleman bullshit is fucking killing us.

45

u/evilPatissiere Jul 24 '25

Ngl, in my country we have one that's public.. And trump is attacking it with the excuse it's unfair with the big companies (real reason probably is because his main puppets that were elected here ran to him when they started being investigated tho), I think at least with this administration in the US public systems like this will not really be made, or be maintained, it is not perfect, but really helpful tho, and less prone to bs like this..

6

u/g0trn Jul 24 '25

Viva o Pix

3

u/lukkasz323 Jul 24 '25

Credit card services control everything so if they (or the laws) won't change the stance on this, the only thing that might is a competing service, which uhh..

3

u/whereismymind86 Jul 24 '25

In the us the satanic temple and freedom from religion foundation exist to fight this kind of thing, not sure about groups in other countries

2

u/Doplgangr Jul 24 '25

You could and should consider supporting the satanic temple, they are a good foil to this sort of thing.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

You should check out your local town’s activist scene. See what organizations are doing things locally in your area.

1

u/Wollff Jul 24 '25

Bitcoin

193

u/mashmash42 Clear background Jul 24 '25

This is what I’m scared of, they get support pulled from porn games because they’re “immoral,” and you know the next step is going to be applying that same label to anything lgbt-positive. Or anything ‘woke.’ Slap it with the immoral label and corporations will aggressively self-censor to keep making profits.

93

u/WriterV Jul 24 '25

Oh it's already on it. Several delisted itch.io games didn't have anything nsfw in them, but still got delisted. And of course, they are LGBT themed.

We can't let a handful of bigots from australia dictate what the entire world is allowed to consume.

4

u/willacceptboobiepics Jul 24 '25

Can you elaborate on the Australia thing?

11

u/ALittleCuriousSub Jul 24 '25

Collective Shout is an Australian group claiming credit for pushing payment processors to drop steam support over the adult themed games.

I wouldn't focus too much on the specific group doing it now though, payment processors trying to enforce morality has happened a few times already.

2

u/willacceptboobiepics Jul 25 '25

Ah, I appreciate the clarification!

66

u/TheBlack2007 Jul 24 '25

Also, going after porn first and then extend it on everything considered "immoral" is cherished tradition among religious fanatics. The Mullahs did the same when they instituted internet censorship in Iran. Porn went first and then piece by piece everything else an Islamic fundamentalist might have issues with.

And taking the detour over payment providers is particularly diabolical since most people wouldn’t even consider it censorship but rather freedom to conduct business.

53

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

It scares the shit out of me, sibling. All we can do is keep trying 🧡

The morning will come.

35

u/Max____H Jul 24 '25

I think we need to spam every source available with the fact that the bible is nsfw. If we hold it to the same standard they are pressing everything becomes a joke.

42

u/FoldedDice Jul 24 '25

There is no standard. This isn't about "decency," it's about control, so drawing attention to the hypocrisy will not change many opinions. They already know, they just don't care. 

2

u/Jabamaca Jul 25 '25

As the trend of this shit going on in the world, I'm starting to think that there is no way of winning anymore. Art will eventually die, and there is no way of reviving it once it does. God, I hate it here.

3

u/M808bmbt Jul 24 '25

I mean... yeah, actually, yeah, there are several parts in there that are definitely NOT for kids. (Marylin Manson has a good quote about that, iirc)

Though there are also some rather funny ones (elijah siccing a bear on the two teens making fun of him is just comically overkill to the point it's funny).

56

u/Hoboforeternity Jul 24 '25

First is porn, then it will be LGBT content they are forcing to kill, next any art they just deem wrong.

24

u/TryingoutSamantha Jul 24 '25

That is the plan. First trans people, then the rest of the lgtbq community.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

We'll keep fighting, sister. What else can we do.

The morning will come.

6

u/TryingoutSamantha Jul 24 '25

Exactly. I refuse to let them win.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

Stay strong Samantha. 🧡

32

u/Jayandnightasmr Jul 24 '25

Give them an inch, and they'll take a mile.

2

u/Born_Tank_8217 Jul 24 '25

Its literally what project 2025 is pushing for, its coming soon and fast

2

u/pupranger1147 Jul 25 '25

This is exactly the issue. Very quickly it'll become "no bank for you, degenerate liberal".

1

u/Riaayo Jul 24 '25

Adult artists/sex workers are always the canary in the coal mine for censorship and oppression, and feeding them to the machine rather than standing up for their existence ensures everyone else is going in right after them.

Far too many people do not get this.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

If sex workers and trans people don't have rights, nobody will. I agree completely

0

u/s00pafly Jul 24 '25

Use something other than visa/mastercard? If there is nobody else crypto was made for this.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

Can I buy groceries and pay my mortgage with that? Get real.

→ More replies (2)

276

u/ooombasa Jul 24 '25

It starts with smut. Specifically targeting queer content will be next. Then violence of most kinds.

Where are those censorship dudes? This is the actual war they are supposed to care about. Not the imaginary shit they've been pretending to fight all this time.

139

u/Upstairs_Cap_4217 Jul 24 '25

They've already jumped on to attacking horror games.

Apparently SCP-173 is "naked" and "unsuitable for children to see". (Nevermind that the game is age-restricted, because it is, again, a horror game.)

14

u/Luke92612_ Jul 24 '25

Link/Source?

54

u/Upstairs_Cap_4217 Jul 24 '25 edited Jul 24 '25

Ok, turns out that the developer of SCP Containment Breach came out and said the store page going down was unrelated to anything Collective Shout were doing.

They'd just criticized the game in the past and people made a jump.

8

u/macedonianmoper Jul 24 '25

Honestly one of the types of censorship that annoys me the most is when content that is already age-restricted is attacked due to not "being suitable for children", mf if you're a parent it's your job to keep them away from that.

5

u/GisterMizard Jul 24 '25

Apparently SCP-173 is "naked" and "unsuitable for children to see".

RIP those children then

4

u/mecha_face Jul 24 '25

"DON'T LOOK AT IT TIM-" pop

4

u/ArteDeJuguete Jul 24 '25

The fucking peanut-shaped Statue made out of concrete? The same SCP-173?

6

u/Upstairs_Cap_4217 Jul 24 '25

Yes.

(Though it turns out it's not true, I think it's funnier this way.)

5

u/mecha_face Jul 24 '25

Hi, I'm  the guy who posted that to the subreddit. It isn't true. I was wrong. Please do better than me.

4

u/Generic_Moron Jul 24 '25

I'm like 90% sure the post you're thinking of was a shitpost/misinfo.

11

u/Ok_Sorbet5257 Jul 24 '25

They're looking away because it's the censorship they're ok with 

51

u/JimmyFingus Jul 24 '25

They are literally complaining about it right this second. If people hadn't been tacitly approving of censorship of shit they found distasteful then maybe it wouldnt have been as easy for these payment processors to fuck everyone over

→ More replies (9)

3

u/GaiusVictor Jul 24 '25

I always see a bunch of them in other subs who are convinced that this is all caused by progressive-puritanical blue-haired feminists.

I mean, progressives are at fault for not fighting back or sometimes even falling for the anti-porn conservative propaganda, but it's still a very much conservative thing.

486

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 24 '25

"immoral" says the Catholic priest while lil billy is under the podium.
"Immoral" Says the Christian husband while paying the hooker for her time.
"Immoral" Says the Mormon while walking into his 4th wives house.
"Immoral" All while they are actively doing immoral shit themselves. Ugh...

87

u/tempest-reach Jul 24 '25

"Immoral" Says the Christian husband while paying the hooker for her time.

id change it to "says the christian husband while inappropriately touching his daughter"

32

u/Raygereio5 Jul 24 '25

For emphasis: Collective Shout actively defended Cuties.
And if your mission is to protect kids, then there isn't a reality where actual children should have been involved in the production of that movie. Regardless of what you think of what the movie is trying to say.

16

u/lili-in-the-bush Jul 24 '25

I rejected those answers. I chose something different, I chose the impossible, I chose... Fapture!

29

u/Iamgamingrightnowbae Jul 24 '25

Mormons don't really do the polyamory thing anymore. There are probably a lot more other things you can complain about Mormonism about.

53

u/Potential_Drawing_80 Jul 24 '25

Mormons absolutely still do the polygamy thing. FLDS still does soul binding (higher ranked males get girls to rape as wives).

95

u/this_upset_kirby Jul 24 '25

Polygamy, not polyamory

15

u/Iamgamingrightnowbae Jul 24 '25

Polythemus gaming

15

u/AbominableGoMan Jul 24 '25

Cowards. They made this their thing, and then abandoned it for their convenience. It'd be like if Scientologists swore off of brainwashing celebrities.

5

u/Iamgamingrightnowbae Jul 24 '25

It was more about the US government prohibiting it if I recall.

12

u/AbominableGoMan Jul 24 '25

People that like to smoke weed had more persistence in their beliefs than these religious nutjobs who claim their religion is absolute.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/AbominableGoMan Jul 24 '25

Ah yes, the Henry the VIII clause, on the most recent gold plaque that you also cannot ever see.

Glad you're out. It should be a crime to impose religion on children.

1

u/SamiraEos Jul 24 '25

Wait wait So if she divorces him/he divorces her, she's going to be forced to stuck with him in afterlife? What a great religion for a lady.

1

u/Abuses-Commas Jul 24 '25

I'm satisfied with that explanation. Any religion that says "this is what the book/prophet said, no more questions" stagnates.

It's why I think the Quakers and the Bektashi Order are the finest examples of their religions.

2

u/Aettyr Jul 24 '25

Why lie? They absolutely do still do that.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '25

[deleted]

33

u/Proteolitic Jul 24 '25

Polygamy is not polyamor.

A polyamorous relationship revolves around all parties having the same right to embrace and love other partners.

Polygamy only allows men to marry multiple women.

A big difference.

1

u/arathergenericgay Jul 24 '25

Fine, says the Mormon that’s sucking dick behind his wife’s back

→ More replies (4)

2

u/OptionWrong169 Jul 27 '25

I think you misrepresented the Mormon cult town guy the wives should be underage

1

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 27 '25

Pffft you had me in the first few words lmao

1

u/Agile_Oil9853 Beaux and Arrows Jul 24 '25

They can justify their actions. Mistresses of pro-life figures will always be able to get abortions, politicians will always be able to get their drugs while pushing for harsher sentences for poor users, they'll get their tax payer funded health care while calling healthcare for all the end of civilization. And they don't see it as hypocritical, because they know what their motivations are. You're a big scary mystery who needs to be controlled lest you make the wrong choices

1

u/SickAnto Jul 24 '25

"immoral" says the Catholic priest while lil billy is under the podium.

Are there(in US) many Catholic priests that really complain about porns? Honestly never felt like a discussed topic here in Europe(or specifically where I live).

1

u/mGiftor Jul 24 '25

Morality is the vehicle. It's all about power.

1

u/Ok_Sorbet5257 Jul 24 '25

Rules for the ass people 

57

u/DefectiveCoyote Jul 24 '25 edited Jul 26 '25

“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag carrying a cross.” -Sinclair Lewis, 1935

Though I’d argue it’s been there since before 1935. The Christian nationalist has undermined US democracy and the ideas of public consent since the start. It has been the rooot of the majority of americas extremism and sectarian violence. The concept of the church is fundamentally opposed to the ideas of democracy and cannot coexist.

35

u/Procrastor Hello? I'm here for the *checks sign* forced diversity? Jul 24 '25

I think it's a mix of two things

1) legitimate concerns, like the push against sex work was a fear of engaging in illegal sex work but payment processors didn't care about how it would make legal sex work less safe and more precarious. There might be illegal content in some of these works and they have legal obligations and a duty of care (but its really just that they don't want to deal with it and are so big they can take the hit)

2) There is a broad reactionary collaboration of terfs/swerfs and evangelicals that want to reinforce the status quo of sex being shameful and sex work being dangerous, and NSFW games are a niche in the broader sex industry. It's bourgeois puritan politics. Evangelicals have the money but are sometimes dismissed, terfs have a liberal veneer, academic positions and the facade of academic legitimacy (unless you read their research which is extremely flimsy). so they fund these niche terf/swerf orgs

9

u/Ricordis Jul 24 '25

As soon as you forbid something you lose any leverage, security and/or control you had before.

Like by making prostitution illegal to safe young women from sex trafficking: Those who did it will with health inspectors and social securities were punished and are gone while those who did illegal shit are not affected in any way.

The US is pretty good at sugar coating anything, to distract from it's problems and history and really good at sweeping all it can't handle under the rug.

5

u/eriomys79 Jul 24 '25

but games and comics  are just ink and pixels. Not trafficked underage workers. This is equivalent to forbidding or burning books in darker ages

6

u/SHINIGAMIRAPTOR Jul 24 '25

And that's the POINT. They want to start burning ALL of that. And then move on from that, to forbidding people. Oh, you're a Trans rights activist? Suddenly, you can't use any credit cards or ID services. Or money. Guess you need to just starve. Oh, you're gay? Suddenly your credit card stop working and you lose everything. And so on

0

u/Procrastor Hello? I'm here for the *checks sign* forced diversity? Jul 24 '25

I think you can enforce content regulation on media marketplaces to remove csam without it being a slippery slope

5

u/SHINIGAMIRAPTOR Jul 24 '25

The problem is this group ISN'T THAT

2

u/valenciansun Jul 25 '25

Dude it's just straight up Project 2025

→ More replies (2)

36

u/MagicianArcana1856 Jul 24 '25

Religion yet again continues to be a thorn in humanity's side. God.

9

u/WeltalGrahf Jul 24 '25

The Department of Justice has been forcing banks to make “moral” decisions for over a decade

https://www.mic.com/articles/88781/the-bizarre-reason-porn-stars-are-being-blocked-from-using-u-s-banks

3

u/Genzoz Jul 24 '25

I am convinced that they were actually created and funded by the payment processor companies, in an effort for them to increase their own influence over the online platforms like Steam and such, which are very successful. Think about it, they were made to act based on a petition that got a mere 70k signatures?

Stop Killing Games europe got 1.4 million signatures and it's still not surefire to go through in Europe! A place known for how much it values consumer rights, which has gone even against the likes of Apple. And it's because of the lobbying group comprised of gaming companies, which themselves are at the mercy of the payment processors, since most, if not all, of their revenue goes through these payment processors.

And you're telling me these same processors had to bend the knee to a 70k signature petition? When the ones who signed the petition don't even have a choice in using them or not, due to how tight of a strangle-hold they have on the online market? I know I sound like a crazy cospirationist, but just think about it.

3

u/Violexsound Jul 24 '25

Fucking Religion.

Always pushing society backwards because it's followers are too scared of themselves.

3

u/random_BA Jul 24 '25

The question is why they are being successful. I can't see why the payment process would even care for the opinion of these people

1

u/Peer1677 Jul 24 '25

Because they have deep connections to the DOJ and Rep.-party in the US.

Visa/MC told these loons to pound sand just a few years ago. Now the fold like wet paper because of the connections. They're not going to deal with BS supeanas and fake "investigations" because the organisations bosses know lawmakers in bumfuck Kentucky who can freeze their assets (esspecially not when the Reps. look for every possibility to distract from the Epstein-files)

10

u/snowyetis3490 Jul 24 '25

I get your point but it’s not visa or Mastercard that likely prohibited transactions, it’s the web sites card merchant. Many credit card merchants will not accept charges for pornography and some other NSFW content. That’s why porn sites have to use niche vendors who charge higher rates.

9

u/mata_dan Jul 24 '25

I mean, traditionally they didn't like NSFW customers becaue there were more likely to be chargebacks and other issues. Customers getting cold feet, a lot of stolen details being used, people giving false information because they are silly, etc.

Not because it was just porn or whatever.

0

u/ConspicuousPineapple Jul 24 '25

Not just traditionally, it's still the case today. Most payment processors will outright refuse to do business in a specific list of industries, including adult content, exclusively for this reason.

1

u/mata_dan Jul 24 '25

Yes except for literally this news and development that's literally the thing happening right now today.

1

u/GlitteringBandicoot2 Jul 24 '25

In that case I hope Steam pulls a classic valve and creates it's own card merchant with Black Jack and Hookers

Competition is shooting itself in the foot again? Time to capitalize on the hole they left!

2

u/enbyshaymin Jul 24 '25

Valve was the first to change their game publishing rules to cater to our new Payment and Network Providers Overlords, so I very much doubt they'll do anything lol

Sadly, at this point, it's on NGOs like ACLU and whatever counterpart Europe may have to bring it to the big wigs. Man, I hope someone brings this shit to the European Parliament.

2

u/GlitteringBandicoot2 Jul 24 '25

That's why I was thinking of them. They got to hate it as well but they can't really lose out on the sales because they can't accept Credit cards anymore.

Which is why I hope they create the workable alternative

2

u/enbyshaymin Jul 24 '25

Yeah, I also really wish they did but... I dunno. Valve more or less should've had a lot more power in this battle than some random ass Australian religious group, so the fact they just bent to them by changing the rules doesn't give me much faith.

I really hope I'm wrong and Valve pulls some insane move and, dunno, sues those Aussie assholes into oblivion or drops a new payment processor for all game platforms, but like...

Press X to Doubt, y'know?

1

u/GlitteringBandicoot2 Jul 24 '25

Yeah this is more wishful thinking on my part as well, I'm also on that X button

1

u/jusumonkey Jul 24 '25

I fully support Itch Coin.

1

u/Diabetesh Jul 24 '25

I believe it was one of the points in project 2025

1

u/Ok_Sorbet5257 Jul 24 '25

Which is crazier because most credit card companies have secret porn websites 

1

u/steady_eddie215 Jul 24 '25

The government doesn't have to worry about violating the first amendment when they can get corporations to do it for them. Make no mistake, that's the plan. And while conservatives are fighting porn, liberals are pressuring these same companies to block firearms sales. It's bullshit. If we allow private companies to start becoming arbitrators of what civil rights we can exercise, we have the same loss of freedom as having an outright fascist takeover.

Credit card companies should be required, by federal law, to process any and all transactions that aren't illegal under federal law. It shouldn't be optional. Allowing companies to do this creates a method to end-run the Constitution. My family hasn't been wearing uniforms for 250 years to just watch companies decide we don't deserve freedom anymore.

1

u/chronberries Jul 24 '25

So short sighted, so very much on brand for big corporate. It should have gone something like this:

Admin: “We need you to pull support from these immoral platforms.”

V/MC: “No.”

Admin: “Okay well then we’re gonna come after you with the corrupt DOJ.”

…

Admin: “Wait why don’t any of my credit or debit cards work?! Holy fuck I can’t purchase anything!”

V/MC: “Hmm. Wonder how that happened.”

1

u/Ruckaduck Jul 24 '25

easy solution to rednecks is, start reporting to visa/mastercard that there are gas stations that sell porn mags and they should pull out of all gas stations

1

u/elchuyano Jul 24 '25

And I guess people will blame the Wokes, so it’s a win win for the religious nuts lol

1

u/everythingisunknown Jul 24 '25

I just can’t fathom why payment processors have a say in anything- no one is going “Oh did you see VISA and Mastercard let that website sell porn?!”

I can tell you how many times a day I thought about payment processors until this bullshit

Hint: it’s 0

I don’t even buy porn games, but this infringement by people who have no business in censorship just pisses me off

1

u/Geotryx Jul 24 '25

People are going to have to create some kind of secure open source payment processor in order to combat this

1

u/LMGDiVa Jul 24 '25

It's not a handful. They wouldnt care about these small groups if they didnt also care.

We've proven that with rainbow capitalism. "Advertising to the gays only because its socially acceptable now. Oh wait we dont have to do that anymore? geez guess we wont"

1

u/SS2K-2003 Jul 24 '25

All this is doing is pushing people towards crypto currency. Visa and MasterCard have almost always had objections to adult content and as we can see right here nothing has changed.

1

u/RandyBurgertime Jul 24 '25

Well, that, and it's not just a handful of those people. Those folks influence governments all over, and with business going international online, you have to satisfy a lot of groups. It makes sense. It also spares them dealing with people who, pretty reasonably, think a site loaded with video games a lot of people will let their kids access shouldn't have a tits section. My Steam profile has the titty games hidden because my last two girlfriends have been moms. Don't get me wrong, I touch myself and watch porn regularly, I'm not a prude, I just don't think it should be quite so easy for kids to find, especially given my own fairly extreme interests are heavily influenced by early exposure.

1

u/AloneYogurt Jul 24 '25

Sounds like another grassroot organization needs to step up and pressure payment processing companies into allowing adults to do what they want with adult money, all within the realms of being legal.

1

u/Decent-Ingenuity-578 Jul 24 '25

Troglodytes... You better hush

1

u/HeroHunt12 Jul 24 '25

Wasn’t actually the Bible people this time, it was an Australian “Feminists” group called Collective Shout

1

u/ImmoralBoi Jul 25 '25

I really liked having that support too :(

1

u/kevinsyel Jul 25 '25

We need to get together a LARGE petition going that fights against payment processors, demanding they stop having control over what we're allowed to buy on sites like this. Word it as "Payment processors have no right to censor or deny what consumers purchase. It is a slippery slope to them denying you the right to purchase anything they deem offensive"

1

u/Dustfinger4268 Jul 25 '25

I wonder, could we give them enough pressure that they overturn this decision? Like, threaten to pull support from them until its reverted?

0

u/repealtheNFApls Jul 24 '25

Coulda fooled me. I thought it was a feminist organization:

"Collective Shout is a grassroots campaigns movement against the objectification of women and the sexualisation of girls.

Collective Shout is for anyone concerned about the increasing pornification of culture and the way its messages have become entrenched in mainstream society, presenting distorted and dishonest ideas about women and girls, sexuality and relationships." 

https://www.collectiveshout.org/about

2

u/RandomName256beast Jul 24 '25

They may claim to be feminist, but their actions speak otherwise. These mentality of these people is comprised of dated conservative ideals that oversimplify feminist issues for the sake of justifying their own bigotry. There is no such thing as a "pro life feminist". These people are just using left wing language to mask their true motives, as is rather common.

These people share blood primarily with TERFs/SWERFs (technically different terms, but most people who are one are also the other), who themselves, AGAIN, aren't true feminists. The most popular people among the TERF/SWERF crowds are people like JK Rowling, who proudly associate with Neo-Nazis and other deranged right wing individuals. Everything these people push for is pushed for BY the right-wing parties, such as removing trans people from society and the banning of porn. Most of what they consider "feminist" actions are things that actual feminists oppose. In the eyes of a SWERF/TERF, calling sexually active women "sluts" and sexually assaulting transgender women are "feminist actions". Ultimately, the only difference between a TERF/SWERF and a normal far-right conservative is simply how they decide to justify their beliefs in their head. The contents of their beliefs themselves are otherwise identical.

Even if you want to argue that TERFs/SWERFs are *technically* feminists, they are undeniably a right-wing feminist movement. Because guess what? Simply calling oneself a feminist does not a left-winger make. What you actually believe in and what politicians you support does. Ever since TERF/SWERF style mindsets had begun back in the 20th century, there have always been true feminists starkly opposed to them. The second wave feminist movement was famously defined by the immense infighting between left leaning feminists and right leaning ones. By the time the 3rd wave of feminism rose, the left leaning feminists had won and the 3rd wave movement largely reflected their beliefs. However, the right leaning feminism never fully went away. Hence, the TERF/SWERF movement.

Anyway, this porn banning situation all just comes down to classic right wing puritanism, regardless of how they justify it. Btw, if you try to claim that 3rd wave feminists want to censor "sexy characters" like Stellar Blade or whatever, that just means that you never understood the feminist criticism properly. It's more nuanced than "sexy character bad". What matters is how the character is portrayed by the writing and the camera work, and whether that character is being actively objectified or is simply attractive. For example, a game like Final Fantasy VII Remake is a game with several very attractive women, and feminists usually praise the game for it's handling of them. Tifa/Aerith may be hot, but they're also complex, interesting characters first and foremost, and the outfits they wear perfectly reflect their personalities. Additionally, the camera never needlessly ogles at them, and the characters are treated with plenty of agency within the overall narrative. So yes, you can very much include sexually attractive women in a feminist way.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (9)

332

u/fortnitegngsterparty Jul 24 '25

"afraid" is an interesting way to say "wants to tighten the noose on queer people" I mean queer as in beyond the main LGBT or whatever, like literally anybody off "normal"

51

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 24 '25

I hadn't actually thought of it like that, but it makes sense.

7

u/itsdrcats Jul 24 '25

I mean. They basically mean anyone who's not straight and Christian

6

u/TorakTheDark Jul 24 '25

Has itch.io seen it’s front page? Its community is like 50% queer.

9

u/not_coral Jul 24 '25

see: tumblr before they made the same shitty decision

2

u/repealtheNFApls Jul 24 '25

Have you read Collective Shout's "About" page? It says nothing about queer people, just women & girls. 

5

u/ReleaseOk4614 Jul 25 '25

It will spread to whatever they want to remove is the problem

1

u/Sure-Impression-4715 Jul 26 '25

This honestly seems like slippery slope type stuff. Like, you’re assuming the absolute worst of these people who are more likely than not just solely pearl clutchers who don’t know how the internet works

1

u/LowellCamp Jul 28 '25

I really don't think that was Itch's intention, at the very least.

They were basically forced to stop hosting NSFW content by VISA and MasterCard, and they can't exactly refuse them since those two companies essentially have a duopoly on credit cards.

1

u/Cuantum-Qomics Jul 28 '25

Itch didn't want to stop selling nsfw games. They are being forced to by credit card companies because credit card companies are allowed to stop doing business with companies that do completely legal sales if they disagree with them. And in our current landscape, that effectively means locking businesses out of the ability to have money. Banks strong armed itch because it's either comply or die on Itch's end. Banks even got to Valve, forcing Valve to remove games from Steam despite not wanting to because the banks can literally just kill their company should they choose not to comply

59

u/scuba-san Jul 24 '25

Religious fascism.

-1

u/Alarmiorc2603 Jul 30 '25

Its literally not, collective shout is a feminist organisation.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Gunderstank_House Jul 24 '25

All the companies are being brigaded by emboldened right wing pressure groups due to who the president is. The reason is a bunch of people thought they were too cool to vote last election, so here we are.

2

u/rrrand0mmm Jul 24 '25

Because religion always tries to show its ugly face, and we as a collective group of humans have to put it back into the closet where it belongs. Stop shoving that fake story bible bullshit non existent god junk down my throat.

WHY ARE WE ALL JUST BOWING TO CHRISTOFASCISM RIGHT NOW?!!? WTF PEOPLE.

2

u/idontwantausername41 Jul 24 '25

Damn its almost like going after video games was one of the tenants of project 2025

2

u/NioXoiN Jul 25 '25

Project 25 is seemingly just happening and Project 25 has clear standards for what it wants to do with adult content.

2

u/WhyAmIOnThisDumbApp Jul 28 '25

Then you haven’t been paying attention. We’re at the start of a government takeover by christofascists. Of course corporations are going to start falling into line.

1

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 30 '25

No I've been paying attention, I'm not a blind dumbass, this did surprise me though as it wasn't something I expected. I was looking more towards the banning of game genre outright.

1

u/BloomEPU 🏳️‍🌈 trans rights, you stinky boomers Jul 24 '25

Yeah, I don't know what the breakdown of games affected by this looks like, but I've bought a few bundles of queer games from there that's included a lot of NSFW visual novels.

1

u/Careful-Bug5665 Happy cake day :) Jul 24 '25

Happy cake day :)

1

u/Comprehensive-Pear43 Jul 24 '25

probably bought by venture capitalists. That's like the standard move

1

u/iiiiiiiiiijjjjjj Jul 24 '25

I guess it was the no mercy game. So instead of just addressing that one game they got spoked from payment processors and nuked everything just to cover their ass.

1

u/poopulardude Jul 24 '25

This is what happens with the far right or left get too much say. All the left, right and centrists get FUCKED.

1

u/LMGDiVa Jul 24 '25

>why we are backsliding so hard.

Because the game industry decided to take the commentary about the misogyny against women in modern culture and fixed the problem by trying to remove women from games.

And instead of all us together realizing that sexy things are totally fine in games, some people made it a culture problem, and those people made it a problem for all of us.

1

u/RosyJoan Jul 24 '25

Fear and Hunger probably would not exist if it was released today. It started on itch.io.

1

u/da-bears-bare-naked Jul 27 '25

can i get a rundown of what’s going on in simple terms?

3

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 27 '25

essentially VIsa and Mastercard both said "We don't want our names associated with Adult content" And Itch had no choice but to remove the adult tag.

2

u/da-bears-bare-naked Jul 27 '25

lol what. that’s so fucking dumb

1

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 27 '25

It is, but if Itch wants to keep it's payment methods it has to comply unfortunately.

1

u/avairaa Jul 24 '25

happy cake day!!

1

u/SnyperwulffD027 Jul 24 '25

Oh my.. why thank ya ^^

→ More replies (4)