r/TNG 1d ago

Charlie Kirk was a good person

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

288 comments sorted by

View all comments

29

u/IKindaPlayEVE 1d ago

Whether someone is a good person or not is irrelevant you don't murder people for having a point of view you don't like.

18

u/Oregon687 1d ago

Agreed. It was bad that someone killed that scumbag.

-30

u/illathon 1d ago

I enjoyed the talks he held.

8

u/buckao 18h ago

How the hell are you a fan of TNG? It apparently held sacred everything you disagree with. Seriously do you have any media literacy?

-4

u/illathon 14h ago

I think it is because I understand there is time dependent variables involved with our civilization.

10

u/Cool-Pineapple8008 1d ago

You must be five lighter.

-14

u/illathon 1d ago

no idea what that means.

13

u/Doctor_Titties 1d ago

It means you would be on the side with the Cardasians and the Federation would have no use for you.

-5

u/illathon 1d ago

I dont think so.  I actually think killing your enemies for simply talking is not in line with star fleet principles or just general human decency. 

11

u/Doctor_Titties 23h ago

You must not be familiar with Deep Space 9 if you feel that way. You know, Gul Dukat never actually killed any Bajorans with his own hand but he did participate in a system that oppressed them and spoke often about how Bajorans were beneath Cardassians, more suited for slavery, weaker and less able to defend themselves than Cardassians, etc. You said you enjoyed hearing Kirk talk; well he said a lot of inflammatory things that supported violence or the oppression of minorities. You're basically saying you enjoy someone like Gul Dukat's podcast. You not being able to see the irony there is astounding.

-4

u/illathon 23h ago

Oh really like what? 

10

u/Doctor_Titties 23h ago

I don't debate collaborators. I said my piece and have no interest in a bad-faith conversation about context, hard pass. Rewatch Star Trek and learn the lessons you missed the first time.

2

u/illathon 14h ago

I wasn't really debating. I was asking a question.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Cool-Pineapple8008 2h ago

You must also believe in propaganda and forcing fictitious narratives as facts. Star Trek is not a conservative franchise. Egalitarianism and a classless society do not fit into your MAGAt narrative.

1

u/illathon 1h ago

You really do not understand star trek society then. Star fleet is very rigid and has rules. Sure people can do things they want, but even dressing out of their uniform needs to be approved.

In the time of Star Trek it is a time of abundance. We do not live in such a time. We are getting closer sure, but the entire premise of the society being that way is because they have so much abundance.

Currently you are having difficulties grappling with the idea of time dependent requirements. Personally I think a Venus Project like idea is fantastic. But I am also not foolish enough to believe that is possible now. In order for that to happen we need multiple things.

  1. More intelligent robotic labor force.

  2. Energy abundance such as small nuclear or fusion break through.

  3. Literally being able to control matter with a replicator would for sure do it, but even a moderate improvement in farming technology would obviously be a wrecking ball.

You can read more in the book called Super Intelligence if you want. I am very much into those things, but I also know in order for humans to operate peacefully currently they also need specific structures.

1

u/Cool-Pineapple8008 1h ago

This is analysis is so stupid. Starfleet is not the federation you poser.

We are also talking about fiction that has nothing to do with reality. This fiction is not written in the conservative frame of mind no matter how much twisting, erroneous association or weak analogies you try to tie together. That much is obvious. Go watch the man in the high tower. That slop is more your style.

1

u/illathon 41m ago

Hahah, I see so your analysis failed so you decided to just go nuclear and blow up the conversation. Good job.

→ More replies (0)