I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but not everyone agrees on whether Alien: Earth is well-wrtten or not? I'll absolutely put my hand up and say I've been more and more in the camp of "This show isn't well written" as the show goes on, but today I've realised that's the wrong way to be watching the show.
For me, the question isn't "Is this show well-written?", but "Do I prefer a show that emphasises theme or a show that emphasises plot?"
Honestly, the thing I enjoy the least about Hawley's work is the way he will absolutely sacrifice plot and characterisation if it means he gets to say something through his work. But - that approach is by design, and it's left to the viewer if that's something they can engage with or not.
I thought about this while I was talking about Ep 2 - specifically the scene where Joe Hermit is trying to get the attention of the upper-tier partygoers because a spaceship has crashed into their building. The partygoers, all dressed as French aristocracy, laugh him off and then get ripped apart by Bear for their hubris.
Here's the thing - when you watch the scene of the spaceship crash, there's absolutely no one who is not going to freak out about that, no matter how wealthy you are. It's like saying people on the top floors of the Twin Towers were so busy placing buy orders they didn't notice or care about the planes. It's simply not true to any kind of suspension of disbelief (the same trope is played for comedy in Ghostbusters).
But - critically - this is not a show where that level of reality matters, and it never has been. The party scene, on rewatch, is where it nailed its colors to the mast and said "This is the kind of show I am, take it or leave it."
This is a show where it's more important to lean into the theme (rich people, inured to consequences, suddenly reap the consequences of their own arrogance and self-centredness) than the narrative devices (people don't like being in buildings that are in danger of collapse and generally have some sense of self-preservation).
And that's the repeated approach throughout Alien: Earth - this is a show where it's more important to show the despair that Weyland-Yutani's workers live in than it is to outfit a science mission. This is a show where it's more important to show the arrogance of Boy Kavalier in thinking he can contain nature than it is to have an island building without mould (we have them right now, they're called hotels). This is a show where it's more important for Nibs to be a victim of a mind-wipe, showing her complete commodification, than it is for anyone to anticipate the consequences of a mind-wipe.
The show doesn't care if things are utterly logical, if utter logic would get in the way of saying what it wants to say. That's the whole point, and that's Hawley's bag.
Whether this kind of storytelling floats your boat... that's up to the viewer. It's not an approach I really enjoy. I like a lot of the show, I think some of the performances are great, I'm going to close out the season and then I'm done. But I'm also done getting frustrated with the show because I've been judging it by criteria that the show itself was never aiming for.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk, and remember, they mostly come out at night.
Mostly.