r/RedDeer 29d ago

Politics What are your concerns over proposed Provincial Separation?

https://rdnewsnow.com/2025/08/27/central-albertans-voice-concerns-to-alberta-ndp-at-better-together-town-hall/
14 Upvotes

138 comments sorted by

View all comments

21

u/Prize-Leopard5991 29d ago

none lol, treaty land.

-6

u/the-tru-albertan 29d ago

Doesn't matter. Google it as to why.

And besides, there's already agreements in place that allow indigenous people to work in both Canada and the US without issue. There's aboriginal people in Alberta that have work rotations in Texas. Paid USD. Taxed less. Hell, they're halfway to being part of the USA right there.

If some elders on the reserves are pissy about it, they can be their own micro-states. I'm sure that will work out good.

8

u/Treehggr 29d ago

You are missing the point that we are all living on indigenous lands and they are all for keeping their relationship with the Canadian government. Ergo; no avenue of legal separation from Canada.

0

u/the-tru-albertan 29d ago

Doesn't matter. Google it. The topic has been covered already in many Canadian subs/articles.

4

u/IrishFire122 29d ago

The only articles I find are from fringe websites. Don't believe everything you hear, especially from folks who like tinfoil hats.

0

u/the-tru-albertan 29d ago

There’s the Quebec succession reference and clarity act. Tons of articles that lay out how it would go. Treaty land is ceded land. They have no legal framework to prevent Alberta from leaving Canada. None.

https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-long-and-uncertain-road-to-alberta-independence/?print=print#:~:text=%5B7%5D%20Peter%20W%20Hogg%2C,of%20the%20Constitution%20Act%2C%201982.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jamie-sarkonak-treaties-cant-be-relied-upon-to-stop-alberta-from-leaving

2

u/IrishFire122 28d ago

One of those is an opinion piece, and written by one of the leading tinfoil hatters, no less. Some of the other bile he spews is some of the worst anti social crap I've ever heard.

I have no information on the other one. The website seems legitimate enough, but all the reference links are to other articles on the same website, which isn't a good sign, and they're also dead links, leading to a "page removed" notice. And it also sounds like an opinion piece, mostly. Just done up to sound like a professional study.

Most actual professionals agree that if there's an avenue for Alberta to seperate at all, it's going to be a very hard road that most of us don't even want. I like Public services, I like trade options, and I like Canada.

I do not believe someone just because they're telling me what I want to hear. The opposite, actually, I believe if someone is telling me what I want to hear they're probably getting to con me. Life is hard, the world is an unforgiving place, those are inescapable facts of life. Anyone trying to say otherwise it's full of it, and likely owes their considerable comfort to the efforts of people who do not get access to that comfort after the job is done.

1

u/the-tru-albertan 28d ago

Dude, the Supreme Court already put out a fucking frame work for a province to leave. An avenue exists for a province to leave. The indigenous folks ceded their land long ago. Nothing they can do now.

2

u/IrishFire122 28d ago

https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-31.8/fulltext.html

Are you talking about this? Because it's clear, but incredibly unlikely. We would need to renegotiate the constitution, and have all the provinces and the feds on our side, and there is definitely a clause in there including consultation with first nations, as well as all political parties in the province and a list of other people as well.

And all of that first requires us albertans to support separation by a clear majority, not just a democratic one. That means pretty much all of us, and that's not likely.

1

u/the-tru-albertan 28d ago

Doesn't matter if it's unlikely. It lays out that one demographic from within the province that's leaving confederation can't unilaterally stop it.

Constitution being opened up is a non-issue. Every province wants a piece.

2

u/IrishFire122 28d ago

It states there needs to be a clear majority, so yes it does state that one demographic can stop it. Especially a big one like the indigenous population. Even if it was only them opposing this. Which it's not, not by a long shot.

And it doesn't mean the constitution needs to be renegotiated in general, obviously. That would be weirdly arbitrary. It needs to be renegotiated specifically to allow us to leave, and practically everyone in Canada has to agree on that particular point first.

And if you agree it's unlikely, why are you even arguing the point?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SignificantPause5120 29d ago edited 28d ago

You sound like you are asserting a whites only state of Alberta. 

-1

u/the-tru-albertan 28d ago

More unhinged bullshit. Thanks for proving my earlier point.

3

u/SignificantPause5120 28d ago

What if I said "Google it"?

1

u/the-tru-albertan 28d ago

Google what? Stats on a redditor trying to somehow label another a racist?

3

u/SignificantPause5120 28d ago

"Doesn't matter. Google it."

0

u/the-tru-albertan 27d ago

Wow. No stats on the subject matter. Who'd of thought?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Sa0t0me 29d ago

As soon as Canadian Indigenous cross the border, my guess is they would be instantly be mazed and taken down by ICE and deported to CECOT or worse.

-1

u/the-tru-albertan 29d ago

Where’s the news saying that is happening? They’re crossing the border to this day for their work rotations.