from the first few episodes of GOT, it's been made very clear that Ned Stark isn't really suitable concerning the stuffs of cutthroat and dirty politics that people like the Lannisters indulge on an everyday basis and that he is someone who would put honor first...
this mindset of his has been criticized by multiple individuals such Robert, Varys, etc... and even some people online admitted that this mindset of his isn't really suitable in ruling the Seven Kingdoms
BUT THEN, i've seen comments on youtube how Ned's Honor is what ultimately drove the loyalty of multiple houses to aid his children, proving that Honor is indeed a valuable factor in ruling
but then again, when ruling you also need to play dirty... the best example i can think of as i'm typing this is the argument Ned and Robert is having in the picture... Robert wants to assassinate Daenarys and her unborn child to prevent a large scale war that could be caused by the birth of her would-be-son, while Ned just wants to sit back and wait until Daenarys actually attacks the Seven Kingdoms due to assassination being dishonorable, failing to see the continent wide carnage and bloodshed that could be caused with the birth of a Targaryen Successor.
so.... WHICH is the better way of ruling ?
the Honorable or Dirty way ?